There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The public health research community has long recognized the roles of discrimination,
institutional structures, and unfair economic practices in the production and maintenance
of health disparities, but it has neglected the ways in which the interpretation of
these structures orients people in overcoming them and achieving positive outcomes
in their lives. In this call for researchers to pay more - and more nuanced - attention
to cultural context, we contend that group identity-as expressed through affiliation
with an oppressed group-can itself prompt meaningful role-based action. Public health's
study of resilience, then, must consider the ways that individuals understand and,
in turn, resist discrimination. In this article, we briefly outline the shortcomings
of current perspectives on resilience as they pertain to the study of marginalized
youth and then consider the potential protection offered by ideological commitment.
To ground our conceptual argument, we use examples from two different groups with
whom the authors have worked for many years: indigenous and sexual minority youth.
Though these groups are dissimilar in many ways, the processes related to marginalization,
identity and resilience are remarkably similar. Specifically, group affiliation can
provide a context to reconceptualize personal difficulty as a politicized collective
struggle, and through this reading, can create a platform for ideological commitment
and resistance.