24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prevalence of inappropriate tuberculosis treatment regimens: a systematic review

      announcement

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A potential threat to the success of new tuberculosis (TB) drugs is the development of resistance. Using drugs in appropriate regimens, such as those recommended in the World Health Organization (WHO) treatment guidelines, prevents the development of resistance. We performed a systematic review to assess the prevalence of inappropriate prescription of TB drugs for the treatment of TB.

          MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were searched for relevant articles in January 2011. Observational studies published from 2000 that included TB patients receiving treatment were selected. A treatment regimen was considered inappropriate if the regimen was not a WHO recommended regimen.

          37 studies were included. Inappropriate treatment regimens were prescribed in 67% of studies. The percentage of patients receiving inappropriate regimens varied between 0.4% and 100%. In 19 studies the quality of treatment regimen reporting was low.

          Despite the fact that assessment of inappropriate treatment was hampered by low quality of reporting, our data indicate a reasonable amount of inappropriate prescription of TB treatment regimens. Thus, there is a risk that new drugs will be used in inappropriate treatment regimens, even with WHO guidelines in place, introducing the risk of resistance development. This article highlights the need to improve implementation of the WHO treatment of TB guidelines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Tuberculosis Management by Private Practitioners in Mumbai, India: Has Anything Changed in Two Decades?

          Setting Mumbai, India. A study conducted in Mumbai two decades ago revealed the extent of inappropriate tuberculosis (TB) management practices of private practitioners. Over the years, India's national TB programme has made significant progress in TB control. Efforts to engage private practitioners have also been made with several successful documented public-private mix initiatives in place. Objective To study prescribing practices of private practitioners in the treatment of tuberculosis, two decades after a similar study conducted in the same geographical area revealed dismal results. Methods Survey questionnaire administered to practicing general practitioners attending a continuing medical education programme. Results The participating practitioners had never been approached or oriented by the local TB programme. Only 6 of the 106 respondents wrote a prescription with a correct drug regimen. 106 doctors prescribed 63 different drug regimens. There was tendency to over treat with more drugs for longer durations. Only 3 of the 106 respondents could write an appropriate prescription for treatment of multidrug-resistant TB. Conclusions With a vast majority of private practitioners unable to provide a correct prescription for treating TB and not approached by the national TB programme, little seems to have changed over the years. Strategies to control TB through public sector health services will have little impact if inappropriate management of TB patients in private clinics continues unabated. Large scale implementation of public-private mix approaches should be a top priority for the programme. Ignoring the private sector could worsen the epidemic of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant forms of TB.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global tuberculosis drug development pipeline: the need and the reality.

            Drugs for tuberculosis are inadequate to address the many inherent and emerging challenges of treatment. In the past decade, ten compounds have progressed into the clinical development pipeline, including six new compounds specifically developed for tuberculosis. Despite this progress, the global drug pipeline for tuberculosis is still insufficient to address the unmet needs of treatment. Additional and sustainable efforts, and funding are needed to further improve the pipeline. The key challenges in the development of new treatments are the needs for novel drug combinations, new trial designs, studies in paediatric populations, increased clinical trial capacity, clear regulatory guidelines, and biomarkers for prediction of long-term outcome. Despite substantial progress in efforts to control tuberculosis, the global burden of this disease remains high. To eliminate tuberculosis as a public health concern by 2050, all responsible parties need to work together to strengthen the global antituberculosis drug pipeline and support the development of new antituberculosis drug regimens. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Streptomycin resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Respir J
                Eur. Respir. J
                erj
                The European Respiratory Journal
                European Respiratory Society (442 Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2PX, UK )
                0903-1936
                1399-3003
                April 2012
                17 October 2011
                : 39
                : 4
                : 1012-1020
                Affiliations
                [* ]simpleDutch Cochrane Centre, Academic Medical Center
                []simpleCenter for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam
                [# ]simpleKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation , The Hague, The Netherlands
                [+ ]simpleEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                M.J. van der Werf, KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, P.O. Box 146, 2501 CC The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: vanderwerfm@ 123456kncvtbc.nl
                Article
                erj01255-2011
                10.1183/09031936.00125511
                3342766
                22005923
                74383ae5-2c7d-4bb3-ab3c-21af048fb047
                ©ERS 2012

                ERJ Open articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the ( Creative Commons Attribution Licence 3.0>)

                History
                : 22 July 2011
                : 26 September 2011
                Categories
                Series
                4
                Series “Rational Use of Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs”
                Edited by G.B. Migliori and D. Manissero Number 1 in this Series

                Respiratory medicine
                treatment,regimen,tuberculosis,inappropriate
                Respiratory medicine
                treatment, regimen, tuberculosis, inappropriate

                Comments

                Comment on this article