10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada– A Call to "Re-imagine" Research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Emerging evidence that meaningful relationships with knowledge users are a key predictor of research use has led to promotion of partnership approaches to health research. However, little is known about health system experiences of collaborations with university-based researchers, particularly with research partnerships in the area of health system design and health service organization. The purpose of the study was to explore the experience and perspectives of senior health managers in health service organizations, with health organization-university research partnerships.

          Methods: In-depth, semi-structured interviews (n = 25) were conducted with senior health personnel across Canada to explore their perspectives on health system research; experiences with health organization-university research partnerships; challenges to partnership research; and suggested actions for improving engagement with knowledge users and promoting research utilization. Participants, recruited from organizations with regional responsibilities, were responsible for system-wide planning and support functions.

          Results: Research is often experienced as unhelpful or irrelevant to decision-making by many within the system. Research, quality improvement (QI) and evaluation are often viewed as separate activities and coordinated by different responsibility areas. Perspectives of senior managers on barriers to partnership differed from those identified in the literature: organizational stress and restructuring, and limitations in readiness of researchers to work in the fast-paced healthcare environment, were identified as major barriers. Although the need for strong executive leadership was emphasized, "multi-system action" is needed for effective partnerships.

          Conclusion: Common approaches to research and knowledge translation are often not appropriate for addressing issues of health service design and health services organization. Nor is the research community providing expertise to many important activities that the healthcare system is taking to improve health services. A radical rethinking of how we prepare health service researchers; position research within the health system; and fund research activities and infrastructure is needed if the potential benefits of research are to be achieved. Lack of response to health system needs may contribute to research and ‘evidence-informed’ practice being further marginalized from healthcare operations. Interventions to address barriers must respond to the perspectives and experience of health leadership.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.

          Despite the growing demand for research that engages stakeholders, there is limited evidence in the literature to demonstrate its value - or return on investment. This gap indicates a general lack of evaluation of engagement activities. To adequately inform engagement activities, we need to further investigate the dividends of engaged research, and how to evaluate these effects. This paper synthesizes the literature on hypothesized impacts of engagement, shares what has been evaluated and identifies steps needed to reduce the gap between engagement's promises and the underlying evidence supporting its practice. This assessment provides explicit guidance for better alignment of engagement's promised benefits with evaluation efforts and identifies specific areas for development of evaluative measures and better reporting processes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature

            Objectives Locally led health research in low and middle income countries (LMICs) is critical for overcoming global health challenges. Yet, despite over 25 years of international efforts, health research capacity in LMICs remains insufficient and development attempts continue to be fragmented. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and critically examine the main approaches and trends in health research capacity development and consolidate key thinking to identify a more coherent approach. Methods This review includes academic and grey literature published between January 2000 and July 2013. Using a predetermined search strategy, we systematically searched PubMed, hand-searched Google Scholar and checked reference lists. This process yielded 1668 papers. 240 papers were selected based on a priori criteria. A modified version of meta-narrative synthesis was used to analyse the papers. Results 3 key narratives were identified: the effect of power relations on capacity development; demand for stronger links between research, policy and practice and the importance of a systems approach. Capacity development was delivered through 4 main modalities: vertical research projects, centres of excellence, North–South partnerships and networks; all were controversial, and each had their strengths and weaknesses. A plurality of development strategies was employed to address specific barriers to health research. However, lack of empirical research and monitoring and evaluation meant that their effectiveness was unclear and learning was weak. Conclusions There has been steady progress in LMIC health research capacity, but major barriers to research persist and more empirical evidence on development strategies is required. Despite an evolution in development thinking, international actors continue to use outdated development models that are recognised as ineffective. To realise newer development thinking, research capacity outcomes need to be equally valued as research outputs. While some development actors are now adopting this dedicated capacity development approach, they are in the minority.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: NeededandChallenging

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                International Journal of Health Policy and Management
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                2322-5939
                December 2019
                07 August 2019
                : 8
                : 12
                : 684-699
                Affiliations
                1Applied Research and Evaluation Consultant, Centreville, NS, Canada.
                2Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
                3Ottawa Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
                4School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
                5Universite de Saint-Boniface, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
                6University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
                7Hôpital Montfort, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
                8Northern Health, Prince George, BC, Canada.
                9University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
                10Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Sarah Bowen Email: sarahbowen.parada@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-5307
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-1216
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-6381
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-1356
                Article
                10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66
                6885864
                31779297
                743d2415-25f1-4f6a-b1db-44182f840e89
                © 2019 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 February 2019
                : 28 July 2019
                Page count
                Tables: 7, References: 80, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Original Article

                research partnerships,integrated knowledge translation,health systems,canada,health system leadership

                Comments

                Comment on this article