49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sequestered defensive toxins in tetrapod vertebrates: principles, patterns, and prospects for future studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chemical defenses are widespread among animals, and the compounds involved may be either synthesized from nontoxic precursors or sequestered from an environmental source. Defensive sequestration has been studied extensively among invertebrates, but relatively few examples have been documented among vertebrates. Nonetheless, the number of described cases of defensive sequestration in tetrapod vertebrates has increased recently and includes diverse lineages of amphibians and reptiles (including birds). The best-known examples involve poison frogs, but other examples include natricine snakes that sequester toxins from amphibians and two genera of insectivorous birds. Commonalities among these diverse taxa include the combination of consuming toxic prey and exhibiting some form of passive defense, such as aposematism, mimicry, or presumptive death-feigning. Some species exhibit passive sequestration, in which dietary toxins simply require an extended period of time to clear from the tissues, whereas other taxa exhibit morphological or physiological specializations that enhance the uptake, storage, and/or delivery of exogenous toxins. It remains uncertain whether any sequestered toxins of tetrapods bioaccumulate across multiple trophic levels, but multitrophic accumulation seems especially likely in cases involving consumption of phytophagous or mycophagous invertebrates and perhaps consumption of poison frogs by snakes. We predict that additional examples of defensive toxin sequestration in amphibians and reptiles will be revealed by collaborations between field biologists and natural product chemists. Candidates for future investigation include specialized predators on mites, social insects, slugs, and toxic amphibians. Comprehensive studies of the ecological, evolutionary, behavioral, and regulatory aspects of sequestration will require teams of ecologists, systematists, ethologists, physiologists, molecular biologists, and chemists. The widespread occurrence of sequestered defenses has important implications for the ecology, evolution, and conservation of amphibians and reptiles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references139

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Global Decline of Reptiles, Déjà Vu Amphibians

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Global Decline of Nonmarine Mollusks

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants.

              The chemical strategies by which parasites manage to break into the social fortresses of ants offer a fascinating theme in chemical ecology. Semiochemicals used for interindividual nestmate recognition are also involved in the mechanisms of tolerance and association between the species, and social parasites exploit these mechanisms. The obligate parasites are odorless ("chemical insignificance") at the time of usurpation, like all other callow ants, and this "invisibility" enables their entry into the host colony. By chemical mimicry (sensu lato), they later integrate the gestalt odor of this colony ("chemical integration"). We hypothesize that host and parasite are likely to be related chemically, thereby facilitating the necessary mimicry to permit bypassing the colony odor barrier. We also review the plethora of chemical weapons used by social parasites (propaganda, appeasement, and/or repellent substances), particularly during the usurpation period, when the young mated parasite queen synthesizes these chemicals before usurpation and ceases such biosynthesis afterwards. We discuss evolutionary trends that may have led to social parasitism, focusing on the question of whether slave-making ants and their host species are expected to engage in a coevolutionary arms race.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                savitzky@usu.edu
                gappa@ethol.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp
                dhutchin@coastal.edu
                rsaporito@jcu.edu
                gburghar@utk.edu
                hbl@zoo.ufl.edu
                circe@cornell.edu
                Journal
                Chemoecology
                Chemoecology
                Chemoecology
                SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel (Basel )
                0937-7409
                1423-0445
                4 August 2012
                4 August 2012
                September 2012
                : 22
                : 3
                : 141-158
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan UT, 84322-5305 USA
                [2 ]Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, P.O. Box 261954, Conway, SC 29528 USA
                [4 ]Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio, 44118 USA
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0900 USA
                [6 ]Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525 USA
                [7 ]Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, 14853-1301 USA
                Article
                112
                10.1007/s00049-012-0112-z
                3418492
                22904605
                7476bc70-f65d-45de-89aa-61b2d4aadc6c
                © The Author(s) 2012
                History
                : 10 May 2012
                : 14 July 2012
                Categories
                Review Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Basel AG 2012

                Ecology
                reptiles,dietary toxins,amphibians,antipredator defense,sequestration,aposematism
                Ecology
                reptiles, dietary toxins, amphibians, antipredator defense, sequestration, aposematism

                Comments

                Comment on this article