5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians’ attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genetic testing has evolved rapidly over recent years and new developments have the potential to provide insights that could improve the ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent diseases. Information obtained through genetic testing has proven useful in other specialties, such as cardiology and oncology. Nonetheless, a range of barriers impedes techniques, such as whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, pharmacogenomics, and polygenic risk scoring, from being implemented in psychiatric practice. These barriers may be procedural (e.g., limitations in extrapolating results to the individual level), economic (e.g., perceived relatively elevated costs precluding insurance coverage), or related to clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (e.g., perceived unfavorable cost-effectiveness, insufficient understanding of probability statistics, and concerns regarding genetic counseling). Additionally, several ethical concerns may arise (e.g., increased stigma and discrimination through exclusion from health insurance). Here, we provide an overview of potential barriers for the implementation of genetic testing in psychiatry, as well as an in-depth discussion of strategies to address these challenges.

          Related collections

          Most cited references165

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Biological Insights From 108 Schizophrenia-Associated Genetic Loci

          Summary Schizophrenia is a highly heritable disorder. Genetic risk is conferred by a large number of alleles, including common alleles of small effect that might be detected by genome-wide association studies. Here, we report a multi-stage schizophrenia genome-wide association study of up to 36,989 cases and 113,075 controls. We identify 128 independent associations spanning 108 conservatively defined loci that meet genome-wide significance, 83 of which have not been previously reported. Associations were enriched among genes expressed in brain providing biological plausibility for the findings. Many findings have the potential to provide entirely novel insights into aetiology, but associations at DRD2 and multiple genes involved in glutamatergic neurotransmission highlight molecules of known and potential therapeutic relevance to schizophrenia, and are consistent with leading pathophysiological hypotheses. Independent of genes expressed in brain, associations were enriched among genes expressed in tissues that play important roles in immunity, providing support for the hypothesized link between the immune system and schizophrenia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations

            A key public health need is to identify individuals at high risk for a given disease to enable enhanced screening or preventive therapies. Because most common diseases have a genetic component, one important approach is to stratify individuals based on inherited DNA variation. 1 Proposed clinical applications have largely focused on finding carriers of rare monogenic mutations at several-fold increased risk. Although most disease risk is polygenic in nature, 2–5 it has not yet been possible to use polygenic predictors to identify individuals at risk comparable to monogenic mutations. Here, we develop and validate genome-wide polygenic scores for five common diseases. The approach identifies 8.0%, 6.1%, 3.5%, 3.2% and 1.5% of the population at greater than three-fold increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and breast cancer, respectively. For CAD, this prevalence is 20-fold higher than the carrier frequency of rare monogenic mutations conferring comparable risk. 6 We propose that it is time to contemplate the inclusion of polygenic risk prediction in clinical care and discuss relevant issues.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities

              Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are poised to improve biomedical outcomes via precision medicine. However, the major ethical and scientific challenge surrounding clinical implementation of PRS is that those available today are several times more accurate in individuals of European ancestry than other ancestries. This disparity is an inescapable consequence of Eurocentric biases in genome-wide association studies, thus highlighting that-unlike clinical biomarkers and prescription drugs, which may individually work better in some populations but do not ubiquitously perform far better in European populations-clinical uses of PRS today would systematically afford greater improvement for European-descent populations. Early diversifying efforts show promise in leveling this vast imbalance, even when non-European sample sizes are considerably smaller than the largest studies to date. To realize the full and equitable potential of PRS, greater diversity must be prioritized in genetic studies, and summary statistics must be publically disseminated to ensure that health disparities are not increased for those individuals already most underserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.luykx@umcutrecht.nl
                Journal
                Transl Psychiatry
                Transl Psychiatry
                Translational Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2158-3188
                11 October 2022
                11 October 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 442
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7080.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2296 0625, Sant Pau Mental Health Group, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IBB-Sant Pau), Hospital de la Sant Creu i Sant Pau, , Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ; Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
                [2 ]GRID grid.5841.8, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0247, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, , University of Barcelona, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]GRID grid.10984.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0636 5254, Department of Clinical Psychiatry, School of Medicine, , University of Panama, ; Panama City, Panama
                [4 ]GRID grid.428313.f, ISNI 0000 0000 9238 6887, Department of Mental Health, , Parc Tauli University Hospital, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli (I3PT), Sabadell, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ]GRID grid.5477.1, ISNI 0000000120346234, Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, , University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, ; Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.5477.1, ISNI 0000000120346234, Department of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, , University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, ; Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.491146.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0478 3153, Outpatient Second Opinion Clinic, , GGNet Mental Health, ; Warnsveld, The Netherlands
                [8 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Psychiatry, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [9 ]GRID grid.461871.d, ISNI 0000 0004 0624 8031, Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [10 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Department of Medical Genetics, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, BC Canada
                [11 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Department of Psychiatry and Medical Genetics, Genetic Counselling Training Program, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, BC Canada
                [12 ]GRID grid.7692.a, ISNI 0000000090126352, Department of Clinical Genetics, , University Medical Center Utrecht, ; Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [13 ]GRID grid.10698.36, ISNI 0000000122483208, Center for Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Genetics and Psychiatric, School of Medicine, , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, ; Chapel Hill, NC USA
                [14 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Karolinska Institute, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [15 ]GRID grid.42327.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0473 9646, The Centre for Applied Genomics, Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, , The Hospital for Sick Children, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [16 ]GRID grid.42327.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0473 9646, Department of Psychiatry, , Hospital for Sick Children, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [17 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Department of Psychiatry, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-7793
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5090-4137
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5580-1898
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0338-7055
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-3126
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-2774
                Article
                2203
                10.1038/s41398-022-02203-6
                9553897
                36220808
                74a7f1f7-1c93-4b05-85a9-0e7f2a4e61ad
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 October 2021
                : 15 September 2022
                : 23 September 2022
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                medical genetics,predictive markers
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                medical genetics, predictive markers

                Comments

                Comment on this article