13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Examining sources of variation in HPG axis function among individuals and populations of the dark-eyed junco.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gonadal steroids are important mediators of traits relevant to fitness, and thus may be targets of selection. However, more knowledge is needed about sources of variation along the endocrine axes that may contribute to functional variation in steroid levels. In a controlled captive environment, we studied males of two closely related subspecies of the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis) that differ in testosterone-related phenotype, asking whether they also differ in testosterone (T), and assessing the contribution of the sequential links of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. When males of both subspecies were challenged with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), they were similar in circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) and T responses. When challenged with exogenous LH, they again produced levels of T similar to one another, and to the levels produced in response to GnRH. However, the smaller, less ornamented, and less aggressive subspecies had greater abundance of mRNA for LH receptor in the testes and for androgen receptor in the rostral hypothalamus, suggesting potential differences in regulatory feedback. We suggest that circulating hormone levels may be less prone to evolutionary change than the responsiveness of individual hormone targets. Among individuals, T titers were highly repeatable whether males were challenged with GnRH or with LH, but LH produced in response to GnRH did not covary with T produced in response to LH. Testis mass, but not LH receptor transcript abundance, predicted individual variation in T responses. These data implicate the gonad, but not the pituitary, as an important source of individual variation in T production.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Horm Behav
          Hormones and behavior
          Elsevier BV
          1095-6867
          0018-506X
          Feb 2014
          : 65
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Biology and Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: cbburns@agcenter.lsu.edu.
          [2 ] Department of Biology and Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: krosvall@indiana.edu.
          [3 ] Department of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: tphahn@ucdavis.edu.
          [4 ] Department of Biology and Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: gdemas@indiana.edu.
          [5 ] Department of Biology and Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: ketterso@indiana.edu.
          Article
          S0018-506X(13)00193-1 NIHMS533152
          10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.10.006
          3944345
          24140626
          74b49119-516c-45ea-910a-5aa19cdfffa9
          History

          Aromatase,Preoptic area,Testosterone,Divergence,Gonad,HPG axis,Independence,Individual variation,Integration,Luteinizing hormone

          Comments

          Comment on this article