16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Screening for problem gambling within mental health services: a comparison of the classification accuracy of brief instruments : Comparison of brief problem gambling screens

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Validity of the Problem Gambling Severity Index interpretive categories.

          The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) is a widely used nine item scale for measuring the severity of gambling problems in the general population. Of the four gambler types defined by the PGSI, non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk and problem gamblers, only the latter category underwent any validity testing during the scale's development, despite the fact that over 95% of gamblers fall into one of the remaining three categories. Using Canadian population data on over 25,000 gamblers, we conducted a comprehensive validity and reliability analysis of the four PGSI gambler types. The temporal stability of PGSI subtype over a 14-month interval was modest but adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.63). There was strong evidence for the validity of the non-problem and problem gambler categories however the low-risk and moderate-risk categories showed poor discriminant validity using the existing scoring rules. The validity of these categories was improved with a simple modification to the scoring system.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating the problem gambling severity index.

            A large, integrated survey data set provided by the Ontario Problem Gambling Centre was used to investigate psychometric properties of the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI). This nine-item self-report instrument was designed to measure a single, problem gambling construct. Unlike its nearest competitor--the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)--the PGSI was designed specifically for use with a general population rather than in a clinical context. The present analyses demonstrated that the PGSI does assess a single, underlying, factor, but that this is complicated by different, multiple factor structures for respondents with differing levels of problem gambling severity. The PGSI also demonstrated small to moderate correlations with measures of gambling frequency and faulty cognitions. Overall, the PGSI presents a viable alternative to the SOGS for assessing degrees of problem gambling severity in a non-clinical context.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Addiction
                Addiction
                Wiley
                09652140
                June 2018
                June 2018
                February 13 2018
                : 113
                : 6
                : 1088-1104
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Psychology; Deakin University; Geelong Australia
                [2 ]Melbourne Graduate School of Education; University of Melbourne; Australia
                [3 ]Turning Point, Eastern Health; Fitzroy Australia
                [4 ]Eastern Health Clinical School; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
                [5 ]School of Public Health and Health Sciences; University of Massachusetts; Amherst MA USA
                [6 ]Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre; The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School; Melbourne Australia
                [7 ]School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies; Auckland University of Technology; Auckland New Zealand
                Article
                10.1111/add.14150
                29274182
                74bbe840-504d-4beb-a323-e9e0bb705149
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article