2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anti-tachycardia pacing in ARVC: should a transvenous or subcutaneous system be used?

      editorial
      , ,
      Europace
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Graphical Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          S-ICD, subcutaneous ICD; TV-ICD, transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia. Created with BioRender.com.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming.

          The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in reducing mortality among patients at risk for fatal arrhythmias, but inappropriate ICD activations are frequent, with potential adverse effects. We randomly assigned 1500 patients with a primary-prevention indication to receive an ICD with one of three programming configurations. The primary objective was to determine whether programmed high-rate therapy (with a 2.5-second delay before the initiation of therapy at a heart rate of ≥200 beats per minute) or delayed therapy (with a 60-second delay at 170 to 199 beats per minute, a 12-second delay at 200 to 249 beats per minute, and a 2.5-second delay at ≥250 beats per minute) was associated with a decrease in the number of patients with a first occurrence of inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or shocks, as compared with conventional programming (with a 2.5-second delay at 170 to 199 beats per minute and a 1.0-second delay at ≥200 beats per minute). During an average follow-up of 1.4 years, high-rate therapy and delayed ICD therapy, as compared with conventional device programming, were associated with reductions in a first occurrence of inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio with high-rate therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.34; P<0.001; hazard ratio with delayed therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.40; P<0.001) and reductions in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio with high-rate therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.85; P=0.01; hazard ratio with delayed therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.02; P=0.06). There were no significant differences in procedure-related adverse events among the three treatment groups. Programming of ICD therapies for tachyarrhythmias of 200 beats per minute or higher or with a prolonged delay in therapy at 170 beats per minute or higher, as compared with conventional programming, was associated with reductions in inappropriate therapy and all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. (Funded by Boston Scientific; MADIT-RIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00947310.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator harm in young patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of inappropriate shocks and complications

            Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted with the intention to prolong life in selected patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes, but ICD implantation is also associated with inappropriate shocks and complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ventricular arrhythmias in the North American multidisciplinary study of ARVC: predictors, characteristics, and treatment.

              Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is associated with sudden cardiac death. However, the selection of patients for implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), as well as programming of the ICD, is unclear.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Europace
                Europace
                europace
                Europace
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1099-5129
                1532-2092
                May 2023
                22 May 2023
                22 May 2023
                : 25
                : 5
                : euad132
                Affiliations
                Cardiovascular Genetics Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal , 5000 rue Bélanger, Montréal, QC, Canada H1T 1C8
                Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
                Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                Author notes

                The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of Europace or of the European Society of Cardiology.

                Conflict of interest: J.C.-T. is a consultant for Tenaya, Lexeo, Bayer, and BMS/Pfizer. M.S. receives educational grant funding from Biosense Webster, Abbott, and Boston Scientific.

                Corresponding author. Tel: +1 514 376 3330; E-mail address: julia.cadrin-tourigny@ 123456icm-mhi.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7489-8744
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7982-1586
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-4214
                Article
                euad132
                10.1093/europace/euad132
                10202496
                37213070
                74d666d5-c65b-4680-bd03-23ed3f330430
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 3
                Funding
                Funded by: Marvin Carsley Cardiology Research;
                Funded by: Montreal Heart Institute Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100012651;
                Categories
                Editorial
                AcademicSubjects/MED00200
                Eurheartj/1
                Eurheartj/4
                Eurheartj/7

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Cardiovascular Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article