Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Renoprotective Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists in Experimental Chronic Renal Failure

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We compared the antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil in the rat with chronic renal failure. One month after five-sixths nephrectomy, male WKY rats were treated for 2 months with either losartan or verapamil. Both resulted in a similar reduction in blood pressure: from 147.1 to 112 mm Hg in losartan-treated and from 155 to 118 mm Hg (p = NS) in verapamil-treated rats. Losartan improved the creatinine clearance (difference +17.1% as compared with +6.6% for verapamil, p = 0.039) and prevented the increase in proteinuria: 12.26 ± (SE) 2.33 mg/day before and 18.48 ± 2.19 mg/day (p = NS) after therapy in the losartan-treated and 17.27 ± 2.73 mg/day before and 32.27 ± 10.29 mg/day after therapy (p = 0.0484) in the verapamil-treated group. In addition, losartan resulted in minimal mesangial proliferation and significantly less glomerular sclerosis and thickening of the small arterial and arteriolar walls. The changes in interstitial fibrosis and tubular hypertrophy, however, were similar in both the verapamil- and losartan-treated groups. Treatment with losartan 1 month after five-sixths nephrectomy in male WKY rats resulted in reduced blood pressure, similar to that of the verapamil-treated group. However, despite similar antihypertensive properties, losartan improved creatinine clearance and reduced proteinuria. The losartan-treated group also had a marked reduction in mesangial proliferation and less glomerular sclerosis and less reduced vascular wall thickness in renal small arteries and arterioles. However, losartan did not totally eliminate nephrosclerosis. The tubular and interstitial changes were fewer in the losartan-treated group. Thus losartan has an additional, although only partial, renoprotective effect when compared with verapamil.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of captopril on progression to clinical proteinuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria. European Microalbuminuria Captopril Study Group.

          To study the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on the rate of progression to clinical proteinuria and the rate of change of albumin excretion rates in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and persistent microalbuminuria. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 2 years' duration at 12 hospital-based diabetes centers. Ninety-two patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and persistent microalbuminuria but no hypertension. The patients were randomly allocated in blocks of two to receive either captopril, 50 mg, or placebo twice per day. Albumin excretion rate, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and fructosamine level every 3 months; urinary urea nitrogen excretion every 6 months; and glomerular filtration rate every 12 months. Twelve patients receiving placebo and four receiving captopril progressed to clinical proteinuria, defined as an albumin excretion rate persistently greater than 200 micrograms/min and at least a 30% increase from baseline (P = .05). The probability of progression to clinical proteinuria was significantly reduced by captopril therapy (P = .03 by log-rank test). Albumin excretion rate rose from a geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of 52 (39 to 68) to 76 (47 to 122) micrograms/min in the placebo group but fell from 52 (41 to 65) to 41 (28 to 60) micrograms/min in the captopril group, a significant difference (P < .01). Mean blood pressure was similar at baseline in the two groups and remained unchanged in the placebo group but fell significantly, by 3 to 7 mm Hg, in the captopril group. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels and glomerular filtration rate remained stable in the two groups. Captopril therapy significantly impeded progression to clinical proteinuria and prevented the increase in albumin excretion rate in nonhypertensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and persistent microalbuminuria.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and renal protection. An assessment of implications for therapy.

            The role of hypertension in the pathogenesis of renal damage is a subject of both historical interest and current investigation. Because of the difficulty associated with studying the pathophysiologic role of glomerular injury in systemic hypertension, experimental models have provided much of the data in this field. The mechanisms leading to glomerular injury are complex and not fully elucidated. Mesangial and endothelial cell injury are thought to be important pathophysiologic mechanisms in the renal injury associated with hypertension. One hypothesis suggests that glomerular hypertension (ie, a hemodynamic event) is the primary pathogenetic mechanism, but another supports the notion that glomerular hypertrophy (ie, abnormal growth-related events) contributes to injury. The intrarenal renin-angiotensin system may play an important pathogenetic role in end-stage renal disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has been shown to arrest the progression of renal injury in animal models. Although the clinical database is incomplete, the findings of anecdotal reports and short-term studies suggest that ACE inhibition may preserve renal function in patients with scleroderma renal crisis, reduce proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy, and normalize renal hemodynamics in patients with a variety of renal diseases. The beneficial effects of ACE inhibition may be due to both hemodynamic (eg, reduction in glomerular capillary and intraglomerular pressures) and nonhemodynamic (eg, potassium-sparing and reduction in mesangial proliferation) mechanisms. The precise role of ACE inhibitors in the prevention of renal damage awaits the results of ongoing long-term, double-blind clinical studies. Nevertheless, ACE inhibition may be an appropriate therapeutic alternative in the hypertensive patient whose renal injury is progressing despite aggressive antihypertensive therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic renal failure: management

               Saulo Klahr (1991)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2001
                February 2001
                12 March 2001
                : 21
                : 1
                : 78-83
                Affiliations
                aDepartments of Internal Medicine F, Pathology, and Biochemistry and the Donolo Institute of Physiologic Hygiene, Tel Aviv University, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, and bDepartment of Nephrology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
                Article
                46225 Am J Nephrol 2001;21:78–83
                10.1159/000046225
                11275639
                © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, References: 26, Pages: 6
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/46225
                Categories
                Laboratory Investigation

                Comments

                Comment on this article