26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension : A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

      research-article
      , MD , , MD, , MD, , MD, , PhD, , PhD, , MS, , BS, , DPhil, DSc, FRCP, FMedSci
      Neurology
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To determine whether droxidopa, an oral norepinephrine precursor, improves symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH).

          Methods:

          Patients with symptomatic nOH due to Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy, pure autonomic failure, or nondiabetic autonomic neuropathy underwent open-label droxidopa dose optimization (100–600 mg 3 times daily), followed, in responders, by 7-day washout and then a 7-day double-blind trial of droxidopa vs placebo. Outcome measures included patient self-ratings on the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ), a validated, nOH-specific tool that assesses symptom severity and symptom impact on daily activities.

          Results:

          From randomization to endpoint (n = 162), improvement in mean OHQ composite score favored droxidopa over placebo by 0.90 units ( p = 0.003). Improvement in OHQ symptom subscore favored droxidopa by 0.73 units ( p = 0.010), with maximum change in “dizziness/lightheadedness.” Improvement in symptom-impact subscore favored droxidopa by 1.06 units ( p = 0.003), with maximum change for “standing a long time.” Mean standing systolic blood pressure (BP) increased by 11.2 vs 3.9 mm Hg ( p < 0.001), and mean supine systolic BP by 7.6 vs 0.8 mm Hg ( p < 0.001). At endpoint, supine systolic BP >180 mm Hg was observed in 4.9% of droxidopa and 2.5% of placebo recipients. Adverse events reported in ≥3% of double-blind droxidopa recipients were headache (7.4%) and dizziness (3.7%). No patients discontinued double-blind treatment because of adverse events.

          Conclusions:

          In patients with symptomatic nOH, droxidopa improved symptoms and symptom impact on daily activities, with an associated increase in standing systolic BP, and was generally well tolerated.

          Classification of evidence:

          This study provides Class I evidence that in patients with symptomatic nOH who respond to open-label droxidopa, droxidopa improves subjective and objective manifestation of nOH at 7 days.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans.

            We studied the response of cerebral blood flow to acute step decreases in arterial blood pressure noninvasively and nonpharmacologically in 10 normal volunteers during normocapnia, hypocapnia, and hypercapnia. The step (approximately 20 mm Hg) was induced by rapidly deflating thigh blood pressure cuffs following a 2-minute inflation above systolic blood pressure. Instantaneous arterial blood pressure was measured by a new servo-cuff method, and cerebral blood flow changes were assessed by transcranial Doppler recording of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity. In hypocapnia, full restoration of blood flow to the pretest level was seen as early as 4.1 seconds after the step decrease in blood pressure, while the response was slower in normocapnia and hypercapnia. The time course of cerebrovascular resistance was calculated from blood pressure and blood flow recordings, and rate of regulation was determined as the normalized change in cerebrovascular resistance per second during 2.5 seconds just after the step decrease in blood pressure. The reference for normalization was the calculated change in cerebrovascular resistance that would have nullified the effects of the step decrease in arterial blood pressure on cerebral blood flow. The rate of regulation was 0.38, 0.20, and 0.11/sec in hypocapnia, normocapnia, and hypercapnia, respectively. There was a highly significant inverse relation between rate of regulation and PaCO2 (p less than 0.001), indicating that the response rate of cerebral autoregulation in awake normal humans is profoundly dependent on vascular tone.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical practice. Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                neurology
                neur
                neurology
                NEUROLOGY
                Neurology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                22 July 2014
                22 July 2014
                : 83
                : 4
                : 328-335
                Affiliations
                From the Department of Neurology (H.K.), NYU Medical Center, New York; Department of Neurology (R.F.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine (I.B.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (P.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Chelsea Therapeutics, Inc. (S.P., L.A.H.), Charlotte, NC; Chiltern (J.M.), Wilmington, NC; The Curry Rockefeller Group, LLC (M.F.), Tarrytown, NY; Autonomic and Neurovascular Medicine Departments (C.J.M.), Imperial College London; and Institute of Neurology (C.J.M.), University College London, UK.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr. Kaufmann: horacio.kaufmann@ 123456nyumc.org

                NOH301coinvestigators are listed on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org.

                Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

                Article
                NEUROLOGY2013551119
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000000615
                4115605
                24944260
                74e8ea1e-3252-47d8-948d-6999f2ac6cd8
                © 2014 American Academy of Neurology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

                History
                : 20 September 2013
                : 16 April 2014
                Categories
                1
                20
                105
                172
                Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                yes
                triangle

                Comments

                Comment on this article