15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Omega-3 fatty acids in high-risk cardiovascular patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the cardiovascular effects of omega-3 fatty acids and have provided unexplained conflicting results. A meta-analysis of these RCTs to estimate efficacy and safety and potential sources of heterogeneity may be helpful.

          Methods

          The Cochrane library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify all interventional trials of omega-3 fatty acids compared to placebo or usual diet in high-risk cardiovascular patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were coronary restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention and safety. Meta-analyses were carried out using Bayesian random-effects models, and heterogeneity was examined using meta-regression.

          Results

          A total of 29 RCTs (n = 35,144) met our inclusion criteria, with 25 reporting mortality and 14 reporting restenosis. Omega-3 fatty acids were not associated with a statistically significant decreased mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.88, 95% Credible Interval [CrI] = 0.64, 1.03) or with restenosis prevention (RR = 0.89, 95% CrI = 0.72, 1.06), though the probability of some benefit remains high (0.93 and 0.90, respectively). However in meta-regressions, there was a >90% probability that larger studies and those with longer follow-up were associated with smaller benefits. No serious safety issues were identified.

          Conclusions

          Although not reaching conventional statistical significance, the evidence to date suggests that omega-3 fatty acids may result in a modest reduction in mortality and restenosis. However, caution must be exercised in interpreting these benefits as results were attenuated in higher quality studies, suggesting that bias may be at least partially responsible. Additional high quality studies are required to clarify the role of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          BMC Cardiovasc Disord
          BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
          BioMed Central
          1471-2261
          2010
          3 June 2010
          : 10
          : 24
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
          [2 ]Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
          [3 ]Technology Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
          Article
          1471-2261-10-24
          10.1186/1471-2261-10-24
          2894745
          20525225
          750130f6-45d3-4929-ba14-a8079996e2e3
          Copyright ©2010 Filion et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          : 20 April 2010
          : 3 June 2010
          Categories
          Research article

          Cardiovascular Medicine
          Cardiovascular Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article