5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Outside advantage: can social rejection fuel creative thought?

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Eminently creative people working in fields as disparate as physics and literature refer to the experience of social rejection as fuel for creativity. Yet, the evidence of this relationship is anecdotal, and the psychological process that might explain it is as yet unknown. We theorize that the experience of social rejection may indeed stimulate creativity but only for individuals with an independent self-concept. In 3 studies, we show that individuals who hold an independent self-concept performed more creatively after social rejection relative to inclusion. We also show that this boost in creativity is mediated by a differentiation mind-set, or salient feelings of being different from others. Future research might investigate how the self-concept--for example, various cultural orientations-may shape responses to social rejection by mitigating some of the negative consequences of exclusion and potentially even motivating creative exploration.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Exp Psychol Gen
          Journal of experimental psychology. General
          1939-2222
          0022-1015
          Aug 2013
          : 142
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA. sharon.kim@jhu.edu
          Article
          2012-21656-001
          10.1037/a0029728
          22889163
          750412cd-cc4b-4f44-9300-ef563f996921
          PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article