18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomised trials relevant to mental health conducted in low and middle-income countries: a survey

      research-article
      1 , 6 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , the PRACTIHC Mental Health Group
      BMC Psychiatry
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A substantial proportion of the psychiatric burden of disease falls on the world's poorest nations, yet relatively little is known about randomised trials conducted in these countries. Our aim was to identify and describe a representative sample of mental health trials from low and middle-income countries.

          Methods

          6107 electronic records, most with full text copies, were available following extensive searches for randomised or potentially randomised trials from low and middle-income countries published in 1991, 1995 and 2000. These records were searched to identify studies relevant to mental health. Data on study characteristics were extracted from the full text copies.

          Results

          Trials relevant to mental health were reported in only 3% of the records. 176 records reporting 177 trials were identified: 25 were published in 1991, 45 in 1995, and 106 in 2000. Participants from China were represented in 46% of trials described. 68% of trials had <100 participants. The method of sequence generation was described in less than 20% of reports and adequate concealment of allocation was described in only 12% of reports. Participants were most frequently adults with unipolar depression (36/177) or schizophrenia (36/177). 80% of studies evaluated pharmacological interventions, a third of which were not listed by WHO as essential drugs. 41% of reports were indexed on PubMed; this proportion decreased from 68% in 1991 to 32% in 2000.

          Conclusion

          In terms of overall health burden, trial research activity from low and middle-income countries in mental health appears to be low, and in no area adequately reflects need.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German.

          Some randomised controlled trials (RCTs) done in German-speaking Europe are published in international English-language journals and others in national German-language journals. We assessed whether authors are more likely to report trials with statistically significant results in English than in German. We studied pairs of RCT reports, matched for first author and time of publication, with one report published in German and the other in English. Pairs were identified from reports round in a manual search of five leading German-language journals and from reports published by the same authors in English found on Medline. Quality of methods and reporting were assessed with two different scales by two investigators who were unaware of authors' identities, affiliations, and other characteristics of trial reports. Main study endpoints were selected by two investigators who were unaware of trial results. Our main outcome was the number of pairs of studies in which the levels of significance (shown by p values) were discordant. 62 eligible pairs of reports were identified but 19 (31%) were excluded because they were duplicate publications. A further three pairs (5%) were excluded because no p values were given. The remaining 40 pairs were analysed. Design characteristics and quality features were similar for reports in both languages. Only 35% of German-language articles, compared with 62% of English-language articles, reported significant (p < 0.05) differences in the main endpoint between study and control groups (p = 0.002 by McNemar's test). Logistic regression showed that the only characteristic that predicted publication in an English-language journal was a significant result. The odds ratio for publication of trials with significant results in English was 3.75 (95% CI 1.25-11.3). Authors were more likely to publish RCTs in an English-language journal if the results were statistically significant. English language bias may, therefore, be introduced in reviews and meta-analyses if they include only trials reported in English. The effort of the Cochrane Collaboration to identify as many controlled trials as possible, through the manual search of many medical journals published in different languages will help to reduce such bias.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

            C Begg (1996)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central
                1471-244X
                2008
                14 August 2008
                : 8
                : 69
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unidad Epidemiologia Clinica, Hospital San Ignacio, Santafe de Bogota, Colombia
                [2 ]Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK
                [3 ]South Asian Cochrane Network; Prof. B V Moses & Indian Council of Medical Research Advanced Centre for Research and Training in Evidence Based Health Care, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
                [4 ]Leeds Partnerships Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
                [5 ]Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, UK
                [6 ]Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry (Kings College London), De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK
                Article
                1471-244X-8-69
                10.1186/1471-244X-8-69
                2527605
                18702809
                7528104d-74d0-4f70-9ff6-66d5ae802eaa
                Copyright © 2008 Sheriff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 7 May 2008
                : 14 August 2008
                Categories
                Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article