8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ¿Existen los instrumentos validos? Un debate necesario Translated title: Are there valid instruments? A necessary debate

      letter
      Gaceta Sanitaria
      Ediciones Doyma, S.L.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

            Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Standards for educational and psychological testing

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Journal
                gs
                Gaceta Sanitaria
                Gac Sanit
                Ediciones Doyma, S.L. (Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain )
                0213-9111
                February 2017
                : 31
                : 1
                : 71
                Affiliations
                [1] Lima Lima orgnameUniversidad Privada del Norte Peru
                Article
                S0213-91112017000100071
                10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.09.007
                755ca1f9-37cc-4be0-af68-0bbd6d37a7dd

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 11, Pages: 1
                Product

                SciELO Public Health


                Comments

                Comment on this article