5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Public health lessons from crisis-related travel: The COVID-19 pandemic

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak that began in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 has transformed daily life in nearly every corner of the world. Individuals’ schedules have been disrupted by governmental measures to control the virus, such as city- and country-wide lockdowns. Interventions such as physical distancing and contact tracing have been shown to stem the spread of COVID-19. However, it remains challenging to manage residents’ and tourists’ mobility; globalization has altered approaches to disease control and prevention [1,2]. The manner in which pandemic-related information is presented to the public shapes individual reactions [3] along with organizational decisions. Media coverage about COVID-19 continues to incite public panic, in part due to misinformation [4]. Even so, the virus’s spread is undeniable, and pandemic-related travel concerns may affect certain demographics more than others. For example, many universities have shifted to online learning to decrease group contact. The closure of dormitories has forced international students in the U.S. and elsewhere to decide whether to remain in their host country for the duration of the pandemic or travel home to their families [5]. Similarly, many Americans studying abroad have been called back to the U.S. Just as “panic buying” and “hoarding” [6] of various items were common early in the pandemic, panic-induced travel may also affect people’s behavior. Individuals are continuing to travel amidst COVID-19 despite restrictions; many are simply desperate to go home. Domestic or international travel may promote COVID-19 transmission, as individuals can spread the virus even when asymptomatic. Some tourist groups, such as college-aged students, tend to exhibit low risk perceptions of travel-related infectious disease threats [7], which may play a role in transmission as well. Many locations have instituted a mandatory 14-day quarantine as a safeguard: inbound travelers from another state or country must self-isolate upon arriving in their destination to minimize the likelihood of viral transmission. However, not all individuals are abiding by these regulations; those who fail to adhere to guidelines could face fines, jail time, or even deportation. Neglecting safety precautions is only likely to prolong the outbreak and place more people at risk. Targeted risk mitigation strategies, and education efforts, are therefore essential to controlling this and future pandemics. The scope of the COVID-19 outbreak is unprecedented. Accordingly, governmental and public health officials have limited experience from which to draw in addressing a public health crisis of this scale. The role of tourist mobility in COVID-19 should help epidemiologists and other experts plan for similar outbreaks in the future. Potential interventions could include instituting large-scale travel restrictions and isolation measures earlier in the outbreak trajectory to curb viral spread. International government officials and disease specialists should collaborate to develop awareness campaigns on virus protection and prevention (e.g., COVID-19 vaccination campaigns [8,9]); providing timely, accurate, and consistent information, particularly with the help of effective crisis communication [8,9], can alleviate public distress. Prioritizing investment in public health infrastructure would also help ensure sufficient capacity and supply to promote resident and tourist safety in the event of another global pandemic. By arming the public with reputable knowledge, citizens will be better prepared to make sensible decisions to reduce transmission. Funding No funding sources. Competing interests None declared. Ethical approval Not required.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19: fighting panic with information

          The Lancet (2020)
          As governments and health officials worldwide grapple with the epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, new developments in the accounting of and response to cases are occurring as part of a swiftly evolving crisis. On Feb 11, 2020, WHO announced an official name for the novel coronavirus disease: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). After a stabilisation in the number of new cases, on Feb 13, 2020, China reported nearly 15 000 new COVID-19 cases and 242 deaths in a single day in Hubei province. Previously, tallies had included only laboratory-confirmed cases, and this spike resulted from reclassification of old and probable cases diagnosed with broader clinical criteria, including radiographical confirmation of pneumonia. These revised criteria have been applied only in Hubei province and might provide a clearer picture of the situation at the centre of the outbreak, as the seemingly low previous numbers had caused doubt and consternation about the accuracy of reporting. WHO has indicated that the trajectory of the epidemic has probably remained the same, but it is still unclear which way it will go and the global community must remain vigilant. How key information is relayed to the public during the next phase of the epidemic is critical. With as many as 72 000 cases, the national security strategy for COVID-19 within China has shifted to so-called wartime control measures, putting cities on lockdown and affecting an estimated 760 million people. Regional identification, isolation, and treatment implementation have brought a range of high-tech and militarised approaches. Identification of suspected cases has included extensive efforts in contact tracing, using everything from transportation documents to mobile phone hotlines. Harsh criticism has been levied about the silencing of dissenting voices in China, including Dr Li Wenliang, who was arrested after raising concerns about the virus on social media and subsequently died from COVID-19. Other concerns have been raised about reported measures such as isolation and mass round-ups and quarantining of people at makeshift medical facilities for unspecified durations. Western media have also reported that some residential areas have been sealed off in a grid system, with checkpoints and monitoring of movements, effectively detaining residents. Some internal public transport and external travel to China has been halted via advisories and bans restricting commercial flights. However, there is little evidence that travel bans effectively halt the spread of infectious diseases, and instead they can hamper supply chains, lead to stigma and mistrust, and might violate the principles of the International Health Regulations, as outlined in a Comment published in The Lancet. The international COVID-19 response has been focused on avoiding a pandemic, of which many experts suggest we could be in the early stages. As of Feb 18, 2020, WHO reported 804 total confirmed cases and three deaths in 25 countries outside China. In addition to confirmed cases from travellers to Wuhan and on cruise ships, countries including Singapore, Japan, Thailand, and South Korea have identified clusters of locally transmitted cases. The numbers are small, but the rate of secondary and tertiary transmission is of grave concern and misinformation and fear are rampant. Thousands of medical workers in China are thought to have COVID-19 and, as countries implement scaled up diagnosis and surveillance, the risks from inadequate protective gear and shortages in testing kits are heightened. The first confirmed case in Africa (in Egypt) is worrying, as weak primary health-care systems could undermine preparedness. WHO has called for more investment in surveillance and preparedness, but governments have been slow to take heed. A huge amount of funding has been committed for vaccine platforms but, even with four candidates in development, there is unlikely to be a viable vaccine for at least another 12–18 months. Dozens of clinical trials of treatment are underway, but it will be weeks or months before the results are known. Addressing the Munich Security Conference on Feb 15, 2020, WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said, “we're not just fighting an epidemic; we're fighting an infodemic.” The ease through which inaccuracies and conspiracies can be repeated and perpetuated via social media and conventional outlets puts public health at a constant disadvantage. It is the rapid dissemination of trustworthy information—transparent identification of cases, data sharing, unhampered communication, and peer-reviewed research—which is needed most during this period of uncertainty. There may be no way to prevent a COVID-19 pandemic in this globalised time, but verified information is the most effective prevention against the disease of panic. © 2020 TPG/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Beyond panic buying: consumption displacement and COVID-19

            This study evaluates consumption displacement, the shift in consumption that occurs when consumers experience a change in the availability of goods, services and amenities to which they are accustomed as the result of an external event, and which is characterised by the points in space and time where consumption occurs and by the movements to, from, and between those points, that is occurring as a result of the effects of COVID-19 on the services sector in the Canterbury region of New Zealand. Based on consumer spending data, the authors identify patterns of consumption displacement for the hospitality and retail sectors as defined by ANZSIC. We answer where, when, how, what and why consumption displacement happens. The findings provide evidence of spatial and temporal displacement of consumption based on consumer spending patterns. Evidence of increased spending in some consumption categories confirms stockpiling behaviours. The hospitality sector experiences a sharp decline in consumer spending over lockdown. Given the lack of studies analysing the impacts of crises and disasters on the services sector and consumption displacement, this study provides evidence of different forms of consumption displacement related to COVID-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Travellers give wings to novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

              A novel coronavirus, probably of bat origin, has caused an outbreak of severe respiratory infection in humans in Wuhan, China and has been dispersed globally by travelers. The WHO has declared the spread of the infection a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Infect Public Health
                J Infect Public Health
                Journal of Infection and Public Health
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
                1876-0341
                1876-035X
                15 December 2020
                January 2021
                15 December 2020
                : 14
                : 1
                : 158-159
                Affiliations
                [0005]Tourism and Hospitality Management, School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, 6027, Australia
                [0010]Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, Mays Cancer Center, School of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, Mays Cancer Center, School of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
                Article
                S1876-0341(20)30755-3
                10.1016/j.jiph.2020.12.003
                7832211
                33422857
                7575eaa6-8439-467d-a837-0602ce7bfb5a
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 6 October 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article