5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Testing Effect and the Retention Interval : Questions and Answers

      research-article
      ,
      Experimental Psychology
      Hogrefe Publishing
      memory, testing effect, cued recall, retention, recall, testing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          People learn from tests. Providing tests often enhances retention more than additional study opportunities, but is this testing effect mediated by processes related to retrieval that are fundamentally different from study processes? Some previous studies have reported that testing enhances retention relative to additional studying, but only after a relatively long retention interval. To the extent that this interaction with retention interval dissociates the effects of studying and testing, it may provide crucial evidence for different underlying processes. However, these findings can be questioned because of methodological differences between the study and the test conditions. In two experiments, we eliminated or minimized the confounds that rendered the previous findings equivocal and still obtained the critical interaction. Our results strengthen the evidence for the involvement of different processes underlying the effects of studying and testing, and support the hypothesis that the testing effect is grounded in retrieval-related processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

          Taking a memory test not only assesses what one knows, but also enhances later retention, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. We studied this effect with educationally relevant materials and investigated whether testing facilitates learning only because tests offer an opportunity to restudy material. In two experiments, students studied prose passages and took one or three immediate free-recall tests, without feedback, or restudied the material the same number of times as the students who received tests. Students then took a final retention test 5 min, 2 days, or 1 week later. When the final test was given after 5 min, repeated studying improved recall relative to repeated testing. However, on the delayed tests, prior testing produced substantially greater retention than studying, even though repeated studying increased students' confidence in their ability to remember the material. Testing is a powerful means of improving learning, not just assessing it.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

            A powerful way of improving one's memory for material is to be tested on that material. Tests enhance later retention more than additional study of the material, even when tests are given without feedback. This surprising phenomenon is called the testing effect, and although it has been studied by cognitive psychologists sporadically over the years, today there is a renewed effort to learn why testing is effective and to apply testing in educational settings. In this article, we selectively review laboratory studies that reveal the power of testing in improving retention and then turn to studies that demonstrate the basic effects in educational settings. We also consider the related concepts of dynamic testing and formative assessment as other means of using tests to improve learning. Finally, we consider some negative consequences of testing that may occur in certain circumstances, though these negative effects are often small and do not cancel out the large positive effects of testing. Frequent testing in the classroom may boost educational achievement at all levels of education.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.

              In three experiments, we investigated the role of transfer-appropriate processing and elaborative processing in the testing effect In Experiment 1, we examined whether the magnitude of the testing effect reflects the match between intervening and final tests by factorially manipulating the type of intervening and final tests. Retention was not enhanced for matching, relative to mismatching, intervening and final tests, contrary to the transfer-appropriate-processing view. In Experiment 2, we examined final retention as a function of the number of cues needed to retrieve items on intervening cued recall tests. In this case, fewer retrieval cues were associated with better memory on the final test. Experiment 3 replicated the findings of Experiment 2 while controlling for individual item difficulty and directly manipulating the number of cues present. These findings suggest that an intervening test may be most beneficial to final retention when it provides more potential for elaborative processing
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                zea
                Experimental Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1618-3169
                January 2009
                : 56
                : 4
                : 252-257
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Villanova University, PA
                Author notes
                Thomas C. Toppino, Department of Psychology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA, Tel. +1 610 519 4722, thomas.toppino@ 123456villanova.edu
                Article
                zea_56_4_252
                10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252
                19439397
                75813318-586f-4c73-902b-35167454a17c
                Copyright @ 2009
                History
                : March 11, 2008
                : June 10, 2008
                : June 17, 2008
                Categories
                Research Article

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                retention,cued recall,recall,testing,testing effect,memory
                Psychology, General behavioral science
                retention, cued recall, recall, testing, testing effect, memory

                Comments

                Comment on this article