64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Imposed work of breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a bench study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The ventilator and the endotracheal tube impose additional workload in mechanically ventilated patients breathing spontaneously. The total work of breathing (WOB) includes elastic and resistive work. In a bench test we assessed the imposed WOB using 3100 A/3100 B SensorMedics high-frequency oscillatory ventilators.

          Methods

          A computer-controlled piston-driven test lung was used to simulate a spontaneously breathing patient. The test lung was connected to a high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) ventilator by an endotracheal tube. The inspiratory and expiratory airway flows and pressures at various places were sampled. The spontaneous breath rate and volume, tube size and ventilator settings were simulated as representative of the newborn to adult range. The fresh gas flow rate was set at a low and a high level. The imposed WOB was calculated using the Campbell diagram.

          Results

          In the simulations for newborns (assumed body weight 3.5 kg) and infants (assumed body weight 10 kg) the imposed WOB (mean ± standard deviation) was 0.22 ± 0.07 and 0.87 ± 0.25 J/l, respectively. Comparison of the imposed WOB in low and high fresh gas flow rate measurements yielded values of 1.63 ± 0.32 and 0.96 ± 0.24 J/l ( P = 0.01) in small children (assumed body weight 25 kg), of 1.81 ± 0.30 and 1.10 ± 0.27 J/l ( P < 0.001) in large children (assumed body weight 40 kg), and of 1.95 ± 0.31 and 1.12 ± 0.34 J/l ( P < 0.01) in adults (assumed body weight 70 kg). High peak inspiratory flow and low fresh gas flow rate significantly increased the imposed WOB. Mean airway pressure in the breathing circuit decreased dramatically during spontaneous breathing, most markedly at the low fresh gas flow rate. This led to ventilator shut-off when the inspiratory flow exceeded the fresh gas flow.

          Conclusion

          Spontaneous breathing during HFOV resulted in considerable imposed WOB in pediatric and adult simulations, explaining the discomfort seen in those patients breathing spontaneously during HFOV. The level of imposed WOB was lower in the newborn and infant simulations, explaining why these patients tolerate spontaneous breathing during HFOV well. A high fresh gas flow rate reduced the imposed WOB. These findings suggest the need for a demand flow system based on patient need allowing spontaneous breathing during HFOV.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury.

          Improved gas exchange has been observed during spontaneous breathing with airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) as compared with controlled mechanical ventilation. This study was designed to determine whether use of APRV with spontaneous breathing as a primary ventilatory support modality better prevents deterioration of cardiopulmonary function than does initial controlled mechanical ventilation in patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thirty patients with multiple trauma were randomly assigned to either breathe spontaneously with APRV (APRV Group) (n = 15) or to receive pressure-controlled, time-cycled mechanical ventilation (PCV) for 72 h followed by weaning with APRV (PCV Group) (n = 15). Patients maintained spontaneous breathing during APRV with continuous infusion of sufentanil and midazolam (Ramsay sedation score [RSS] of 3). Absence of spontaneous breathing (PCV Group) was induced with sufentanil and midazolam (RSS of 5) and neuromuscular blockade. Primary use of APRV was associated with increases (p < 0.05) in respiratory system compliance (CRS), arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), cardiac index (CI), and oxygen delivery (DO2), and with reductions (p < 0.05) in venous admixture (QVA/QT), and oxygen extraction. In contrast, patients who received 72 h of PCV had lower CRS, PaO2, CI, DO2, and Q VA/Q T values (p < 0.05) and required higher doses of sufentanil (p < 0.05), midazolam (p < 0.05), noradrenalin (p < 0.05), and dobutamine (p < 0.05). CRS, PaO2), CI and DO2 were lowest (p < 0.05) and Q VA/Q T was highest (p < 0.05) during PCV. Primary use of APRV was consistently associated with a shorter duration of ventilatory support (APRV Group: 15 +/- 2 d [mean +/- SEM]; PCV Group: 21 +/- 2 d) (p < 0.05) and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (APRV Group: 23 +/- 2 d; PCV Group: 30 +/- 2 d) (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that maintaining spontaneous breathing during APRV requires less sedation and improves cardiopulmonary function, presumably by recruiting nonventilated lung units, requiring a shorter duration of ventilatory support and ICU stay.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

            Observational studies of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome have demonstrated improvements in oxygenation. We designed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with conventional ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome; 148 adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (Pa(O2)/fraction of inspired oxygen
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support improves ventilation-perfusion distributions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

              Ventilation-perfusion (V A/Q) distributions were evaluated in 24 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), during airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) with and without spontaneous breathing, or during pressure support ventilation (PSV). Whereas PSV provides mechanical assistance of each inspiration, APRV allows unrestricted spontaneous breathing throughout the mechanical ventilation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive APRV and PSV with equal airway pressure limits (Paw) (n = 12) or minute ventilation (V E) (n = 12). In both groups spontaneous breathing during APRV was associated with increases (p < 0.05) in right ventricular end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, cardiac index (CI), PaO2, oxygen delivery, and mixed venous oxygen tension (PvO2) and with reductions (p < 0.05) in pulmonary vascular resistance and oxygen extraction. PSV did not consistently improve CI and PaO2 when compared with APRV without spontaneous breathing. Improved V A/Q matching during spontaneous breathing with APRV was evidenced by decreases in intrapulmonary shunt (equal Paw: 33 +/- 4 to 24 +/- 4%; equal V E: 32 +/- 4 to 25 +/- 2%) (p < 0.05), dead space (equal Paw: 44 +/- 9 to 38 +/- 6%; equal V E: 44 +/- 9 to 38 +/- 6%) (p < 0.05), and the dispersions of ventilation (equal Paw: 0.96 +/- 0.23 to 0.78 +/- 0.22; equal V E: 0.92 +/- 0.23 to 0.79 +/- 0.22) (p < 0.05), and pulmonary blood flow distribution (equal Paw: 0.89 +/- 0.12 to 0.72 +/- 0.10; equal V E: 0.94 +/- 0.19 to 0.78 +/- 0.22) (p < 0.05). PSV did not improve V A/Q distributions when compared with APRV without spontaneous breathing. These findings indicate that uncoupling of spontaneous and mechanical ventilation during APRV improves V A/Q matching in ARDS presumably by recruiting nonventilated lung units. Apparently, mechanical assistance of each inspiration during PSV is not sufficient to counteract the V A/Q maldistribution caused by alveolar collapse in patients with ARDS.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                2006
                1 February 2006
                : 10
                : 1
                : R23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fellow of Pediatric Intensive Care, Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Medical Physicist, Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Biomedical Engineer, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Biomedical Engineer, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic
                [5 ]Pediatric Intensivist, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                cc3988
                10.1186/cc3988
                1550789
                16469130
                75c82bbe-bc92-46fd-81fd-f7e63b6039bf
                Copyright © 2006 van Heerde et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 October 2005
                : 30 November 2005
                : 22 December 2005
                : 11 January 2006
                Categories
                Research

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log