14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bone Flap Resorption Following Cranioplasty with Autologous Bone: Quantitative Measurement of Bone Flap Resorption and Predictive Factors

      research-article
      , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D.
      Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
      Korean Neurosurgical Society
      Autografts, Bone resorption

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To quantitatively measure the degree of bone flap resorption (BFR) following autologous bone cranioplasty and to investigate factors associated with BFR.

          Methods

          We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and subsequent autologous bone cranioplasty between April 2005 and October 2014. BFR was defined as: 1) decrement ratio ([the ratio of initial BF size/craniectomy size]–[the ratio of last BF/craniectomy size]) >0.1; and 2) bone flap thinning or geometrical irregularity of bone flap shape on computed tomographic scan or skull plain X-ray. The minimal interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty was one month and the minimal follow-up period was one year. Clinical factors were compared between the BFR and no-BFR groups.

          Results

          The time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty was 175.7±258.2 days and the mean period of follow up was 1364±886.8 days. Among the 29 patients (mean age 48.1 years, male: female ratio 20: 9), BFR occurred in 8 patients (27.6%). In one patient, removal of the bone flap was carried out due to severe BFR. The overall rate of BFR was 0.10±0.11 over 3.7 years. Following univariate analysis, younger age (30.5±23.2 vs. 54.9±13.4) and longer follow-up period (2204.5±897.3 vs. 1044.1±655.1) were significantly associated with BFR ( p=0.008 and 0.003, respectively).

          Conclusion

          The degree of BFR following autologous bone cranioplasty was 2.7%/year and was associated with younger age and longer follow-up period.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases.

            Decompressive craniectomy is a potentially life-saving procedure used in the treatment of medically refractory intracranial hypertension, most commonly in the setting of trauma or cerebral infarction. Once performed, surviving patients are obligated to undergo a second procedure for cranial reconstruction. The complications following cranial reconstruction are not well described in the literature and may very well be underreported. A review of the complications would suggest measures to improve the care of these patients. A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients who had undergone cranioplasty during a 7-year period. Demographic data, indications for craniectomy, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters following cranioplasty, were recorded. Perioperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. Patients were classified as having no complications, any complications, and complications requiring reoperation. The groups were compared to identify risk factors predictive of poor outcomes. The authors identified 62 patients who had undergone cranioplasty. The immediate postoperative complication rate was 34%. Of these, 46 patients did not require reoperation and 16 did. Of those requiring reoperation, 7 were due to infection, 2 from wound breakdown, 2 from intracranial hemorrhage, 3 from bone resorption, and 1 from a sunken cranioplasty, and 1 patient's cranioplasty procedure was prematurely ended due to intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia. The only factor statistically associated with need for reoperation was the presence of a bifrontal cranial defect (bifrontal: 8 [67%] of 12, requiring reoperation; unilateral: 8 [16%] of 49 requiring reoperation; p < 0.01) Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is associated with a high complication rate. Patients undergoing a bifrontal craniectomy are at significantly increased risk for postcranioplasty complications, including the need for reoperation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy.

              Hemicraniectomy is a commonly practiced neurosurgical intervention with a wide range of indications and clinical data supporting its use. The extensive use of this procedure directly results in more cranioplasties to repair skull defects. The complication rate for cranial repair after craniectomy seems to be higher than that of the typical elective craniotomy. This finding prompted the authors to review their experience with patients undergoing cranial repair. The authors performed a retrospective review of 212 patients who underwent cranial repair over a 13-year period at their institution. A database tracking age, presenting diagnosis, side of surgery, length of time before cranial repair, bone graft material used, presence of a ventricular shunt, presence of a postoperative drain, and complications was created and analyzed. The overall complication rate was 16.4% (35 of 213 patients). Patients 0-39 years of age had the lowest complication rate of 8% (p = 0.028). For patients 40-59 years of age and older than 60, complication rates were 20 and 26%, respectively. Patients who originally presented with traumatic injuries had a lower rate of complications than those who did not (10 vs 20%; p = 0.049). Conversely, patients who presented with tumors had a higher complication rate than those without (38 vs 15%; p = 0.027). Patients who received autologous bone graft placement had a statistically significant lower risk of postoperative infection (4.6 vs 18.4%; p = 0.002). Patients who underwent cranioplasty with a 0-3 month interval between operations had a complication rate of 9%, 3-6 months 18.8%, and > 6 months 26%. Pairwise comparisons showed that the difference between the 0-3 month interval and the > 6-month interval was significant (p = 0.007). The difference between the 0-3 month interval and the 4-6 month interval showed a trend (p = 0.07). No difference was detected between the 4-6 month interval and > 6-month interval (p = 0.35). The overall rate of complications related to cranioplasty after craniectomy is not negligible, and certain factors may be associated with increased risk. Therefore, when evaluating the need to perform a large decompressive craniectomy, the surgeon should also be aware that the patient is not only subject to the risks of the initial operation, but also the risks of subsequent cranioplasty.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Korean Neurosurg Soc
                J Korean Neurosurg Soc
                jkns
                Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
                Korean Neurosurgical Society
                2005-3711
                1598-7876
                November 2017
                25 October 2017
                : 60
                : 6
                : 749-754
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University Eulji Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Address for reprints: Jae Hoon Kim, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University Eulji Hospital, 68 Hangeulbiseok-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01830, Korea, Tel: +82-2-970-8266, Fax: +82-2-979-8268, E-mail: grimi2@ 123456hanmail.net
                Article
                jkns-60-6-749
                10.3340/jkns.2017.0203.002
                5678054
                29142636
                75eb41a8-3e40-4752-a7e4-95c1af9c3119
                Copyright © 2017 The Korean Neurosurgical Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 March 2017
                : 29 June 2017
                : 02 August 2017
                Categories
                Clinical Article

                Surgery
                autografts,bone resorption
                Surgery
                autografts, bone resorption

                Comments

                Comment on this article