11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      X Chromosome Evolution in Cetartiodactyla

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The phenomenon of a remarkable conservation of the X chromosome in eutherian mammals has been first described by Susumu Ohno in 1964. A notable exception is the cetartiodactyl X chromosome, which varies widely in morphology and G-banding pattern between species. It is hypothesized that this sex chromosome has undergone multiple rearrangements that changed the centromere position and the order of syntenic segments over the last 80 million years of Cetartiodactyla speciation. To investigate its evolution we have selected 26 evolutionarily conserved bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones from the cattle CHORI-240 library evenly distributed along the cattle X chromosome. High-resolution BAC maps of the X chromosome on a representative range of cetartiodactyl species from different branches: pig (Suidae), alpaca (Camelidae), gray whale (Cetacea), hippopotamus (Hippopotamidae), Java mouse-deer (Tragulidae), pronghorn (Antilocapridae), Siberian musk deer (Moschidae), and giraffe (Giraffidae) were obtained by fluorescent in situ hybridization. To trace the X chromosome evolution during fast radiation in specious families, we performed mapping in several cervids (moose, Siberian roe deer, fallow deer, and Pere David’s deer) and bovid (muskox, goat, sheep, sable antelope, and cattle) species. We have identified three major conserved synteny blocks and rearrangements in different cetartiodactyl lineages and found that the recently described phenomenon of the evolutionary new centromere emergence has taken place in the X chromosome evolution of Cetartiodactyla at least five times. We propose the structure of the putative ancestral cetartiodactyl X chromosome by reconstructing the order of syntenic segments and centromere position for key groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes.

            The order Cetartiodactyla includes cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) that are found in all oceans and seas, as well as in some rivers, and artiodactyls (ruminants, pigs, peccaries, hippos, camels and llamas) that are present on all continents, except Antarctica and until recent invasions, Australia. There are currently 332 recognized cetartiodactyl species, which are classified into 132 genera and 22 families. Most phylogenetic studies have focused on deep relationships, and no comprehensive time-calibrated tree for the group has been published yet. In this study, 128 new complete mitochondrial genomes of Cetartiodactyla were sequenced and aligned with those extracted from nucleotide databases. Our alignment includes 14,902 unambiguously aligned nucleotide characters for 210 taxa, representing 183 species, 107 genera, and all cetartiodactyl families. Our mtDNA data produced a statistically robust tree, which is largely consistent with previous classifications. However, a few taxa were found to be para- or polyphyletic, including the family Balaenopteridae, as well as several genera and species. Accordingly, we propose several taxonomic changes in order to render the classification compatible with our molecular phylogeny. In some cases, the results can be interpreted as possible taxonomic misidentification or evidence for mtDNA introgression. The existence of three new cryptic species of Ruminantia should therefore be confirmed by further analyses using nuclear data. We estimate divergence times using Bayesian relaxed molecular clock models. The deepest nodes appeared very sensitive to prior assumptions leading to unreliable estimates, primarily because of the misleading effects of rate heterogeneity, saturation and divergent outgroups. In addition, we detected that Whippomorpha contains slow-evolving taxa, such as large whales and hippos, as well as fast-evolving taxa, such as river dolphins. Our results nevertheless indicate that the evolutionary history of cetartiodactyls was punctuated by four main phases of rapid radiation during the Cenozoic era: the sudden occurrence of the three extant lineages within Cetartiodactyla (Cetruminantia, Suina and Tylopoda); the basal diversification of Cetacea during the Early Oligocene; and two radiations that involve Cetacea and Pecora, one at the Oligocene/Miocene boundary and the other in the Middle Miocene. In addition, we show that the high species diversity now observed in the families Bovidae and Cervidae accumulated mainly during the Late Miocene and Plio-Pleistocene. Copyright © 2011 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

              The genome organizations of eight phylogenetically distinct species from five mammalian orders were compared in order to address fundamental questions relating to mammalian chromosomal evolution. Rates of chromosome evolution within mammalian orders were found to increase since the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Nearly 20% of chromosome breakpoint regions were reused during mammalian evolution; these reuse sites are also enriched for centromeres. Analysis of gene content in and around evolutionary breakpoint regions revealed increased gene density relative to the genome-wide average. We found that segmental duplications populate the majority of primate-specific breakpoints and often flank inverted chromosome segments, implicating their role in chromosomal rearrangement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Genes (Basel)
                Genes (Basel)
                genes
                Genes
                MDPI
                2073-4425
                31 August 2017
                September 2017
                : 8
                : 9
                : 216
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia; zakal@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru (A.I.K.); polina.perelman@ 123456gmail.com (P.L.P.); alex.makunin@ 123456gmail.com (A.I.M.); lemnat@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru (N.A.L.); bekl@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru (V.R.B.); graf@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru (A.S.G.)
                [2 ]Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova Str. 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
                [3 ]The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK; dmlarkin@ 123456gmail.com (D.M.L.); mfarrebelmonte@ 123456gmail.com (M.F.)
                [4 ]Animal Sciences Department, College of ACES, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA; avk@ 123456illinois.edu (A.V.K.); jjohnso@ 123456illinois.edu (J.L.J.)
                [5 ]Frederick National Laboratory of Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD 21702, USA; melodyr@ 123456mail.nih.gov
                [6 ]Catoctin Zoo and Wildlife Preserve, Thurmont, MD 21788, USA; rapunta@ 123456yahoo.com
                [7 ]San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA 92027, USA; oryder@ 123456sandiegozoo.org
                [8 ]Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint-Petersburg State University, Sredniy Av. 41A, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russia; lgdchief@ 123456gmail.com
                [9 ]Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: andrena@ 123456mcb.nsc.ru ; Tel.: +7-960-799-5653
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-5100
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-6201
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9170-5767
                Article
                genes-08-00216
                10.3390/genes8090216
                5615350
                28858207
                7614671f-125e-480a-b74a-212f36ed5e3f
                © 2017 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 August 2017
                : 25 August 2017
                Categories
                Article

                pecora,ruminantia,cattle bacterial artificial chromosome (bac) clones,fluorescent in situ hybridization (fish),intrachromosomal rearrangements,centromere reposition,inversion

                Comments

                Comment on this article