5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Concomitant diagnosis of asthma and COPD: a quantitative study in UK primary care

      research-article
      , MSc, MD , PhD, MRCP, MRCGP , PharmD, PhD , MSc, PhD, FRCP, FRCGP, FFPH, FMedSci , MSc, PhD , MSc, PhD, FRCP
      The British Journal of General Practice
      Royal College of General Practitioners
      asthma, COPD, electronic health records, epidemiology, primary health care, validation studies

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) share many characteristics and symptoms, and the differential diagnosis between the two diseases can be difficult in primary care. This study explored potential overlap between both diseases in a primary care environment.

          Aim

          To quantify how commonly patients with COPD have a concomitant diagnosis of asthma, and how commonly patients with asthma have a concomitant diagnosis of COPD in UK primary care. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the extent of possible misdiagnosis and missed opportunities for diagnosis.

          Design and setting

          Patients with validated asthma and patients with validated COPD in primary care were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in separate validation studies, and the diseases were confirmed by review of GP questionnaires.

          Method

          The prevalence of concurrent asthma and COPD in validated cases of either disease was examined based on CPRD coding, GP questionnaires, and requested additional information.

          Results

          In total, 400 patients with COPD and 351 patients with asthma in primary care were identified. Of the patients with validated asthma, 15% ( n = 52) had previously received a diagnostic COPD Read code, although COPD was only likely in 14.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.3 to 19.0) of patients with validated asthma. More than half (52.5%, n = 210) of patients with validated COPD had previously received a diagnostic asthma Read code. However, when considering additional evidence to support a diagnosis of asthma, concurrent asthma was only likely in 14.5% (95% CI = 11.2 to 18.3) of patients with validated COPD.

          Conclusion

          A concurrent asthma and COPD diagnosis appears to affect a relative minority of patients with COPD (14.5%) or asthma (14.8%). Asthma diagnosis may be over-recorded in people with COPD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource.

          Since its inception in the mid-1980s, the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) has undergone many changes but remains the largest validated and most utilised primary care database in the UK. Its use in pharmacoepidemiology stretches back many years with now over 800 original research papers. Administered by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency since 2001, the last 5 years have seen a rebuild of the database processing system enhancing access to the data, and a concomitant push towards broadening the applications of the database. New methodologies including real-world harm-benefit assessment, pharmacogenetic studies and pragmatic randomised controlled trials within the database are being implemented. A substantive and unique linkage program (using a trusted third party) has enabled access to secondary care data and disease-specific registry data as well as socio-economic data and death registration data. The utility of anonymised free text accessed in a safe and appropriate manner is being explored using simple and more complex techniques such as natural language processing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over.

            Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often misdiagnosed as asthma, leading to inappropriate treatment and suboptimal patient outcomes. As part of a prospective study of patients with a history consistent with obstructive lung disease, we compared prior diagnostic labels with a study diagnosis based on spirometric results. We enrolled persons 40 years of age or older with prior diagnoses or medications consistent with obstructive lung disease. Patients were recruited via random mailing to primary care practices in Aberdeen, Scotland, and Denver, Colorado. Prior diagnoses of chronic bronchitis or emphysema (CBE) and asthma were reported by the subjects. Participants underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. A study diagnosis of COPD was defined using post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV(1)/FVC) < 0.70. Spirometric examination was complete in 597 patients, of whom 235 (39.4%) had a study diagnosis of COPD. Among subjects with a spirometry-based study diagnosis of COPD, 121 (51.5%) reported a prior diagnosis of asthma without concurrent CBE diagnosis, 89 (37.9%) reported a prior diagnosis of CBE, and 25 (10.6%) reported no prior diagnosis of obstructive lung disease. Despite the availability of consensus guideline diagnostic recommendations, diagnostic confusion between COPD and asthma appears common. Increased awareness of the differences between the two conditions is needed to promote optimal patient management and treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnostic spirometry in primary care: Proposed standards for general practice compliant with American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recommendations: a General Practice Airways Group (GPIAG)1 document, in association with the Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology (ARTP)2 and Education for Health3 1 www.gpiag.org 2 www.artp.org 3 www.educationforhealth.org.uk.

              Primary care spirometry services can be provided by trained primary care staff, peripatetic specialist services, or through referral to hospital-based or laboratory spirometry. The first of these options is the focus of this Standards Document. It aims to provide detailed information for clinicians, managers and healthcare commissioners on the key areas of quality required for diagnostic spirometry in primary care--including training requirements and quality assurance. These proposals and recommendations are designed to raise the standard of spirometry and respiratory diagnosis in primary care and to provide the impetus for debate, improvement and maintenance of quality for diagnostic (rather than screening) spirometry performed in primary care. This document should therefore challenge current performance and should constitute an aspirational guide for delivery of this service.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: PhD candidate
                Role: GP and clinical research fellow
                Role: Senior director at GSK, GSK Academy Fellow
                Role: Professor of clinical epidemiology
                Role: Associate professor of pharmacoepidemiology
                Role: Clinical senior lecturer in respiratory epidemiology
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                November 2018
                25 September 2018
                25 September 2018
                : 68
                : 676
                : e775-e782
                Affiliations
                Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
                Division of Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee.
                Real World Data and Epidemiology, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Uxbridge.
                Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
                Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
                National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Francis Nissen, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Email: francis.nissen@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk
                Article
                10.3399/bjgp18X699389
                6193792
                30249612
                7621090d-ed7f-4145-8197-4d36516873c8
                © British Journal of General Practice 2018

                This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 February 2018
                : 17 April 2018
                : 30 April 2018
                Categories
                Research

                asthma,copd,electronic health records,epidemiology,primary health care,validation studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article