6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Vaccine injection technique and reactogenicity--evidence for practice.

      1
      Vaccine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are inconsistencies in recommendations and practice with regards to how best to administer vaccines. This review evaluates the literature on intramuscular vaccine administration technique in primarily paediatric populations and concludes from available evidence which aspects of vaccine administration are associated with reactogenicity. Variables with best evidence to support practice to reduce reactogenicity were: Site of injection--less reactogenicity has been noted when the buttock is used rather than the thigh; tissue (muscle or subcutaneous)--less reactions are noted when vaccine is administered intramuscularly rather than subcutaneously; length of needle--longer needles are associated with less reactogenicity. Angle of injection--a 90 degrees angle is associated with less reactogenicity than a reduced angle. Despite a need for more empirical studies, there appears to be several vaccine administration techniques relating to needle angle, length, site and depth of injection that result in fewer reactions and these could be considered for public health policy, in conjunction with immunogenicity.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Vaccine
          Vaccine
          0264-410X
          0264-410X
          Nov 25 2008
          : 26
          : 50
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Immunisation Advisory Centre, Department of General Practice & Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, PB 92 019 Auckland, New Zealand. h.petousis-harris@auckland.ac.nz
          Article
          S0264-410X(08)01201-2
          10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.052
          18804137
          76684f95-2621-4212-880b-9097e8384be6
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article