7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian port catheter implantation in resectable breast cancer patients: A novel, safe, and convenient clinical practice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Port catheter (PC) is a classical route of administering chemotherapy for breast cancer patients. We established a standard operating procedure (SOP) of intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation in selected resectable breast cancer patients.

          Methods

          We conducted a prospective clinical study to assess its safety and complications. A total of seventy six resectable breast cancer patients were included for intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation. Thirty patients receiving conventional percutaneous contralateral PC implantation under local anesthesia at the same period were recruited as control group. The time consuming of implantation, and PC‐related complications were recorded. Visual analog scale questionnaires were used to assess patients’ satisfaction.

          Results

          Compared with conventional contralateral PC implantation under local anesthesia, SOP for intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation significantly shortens the time consuming (11.6 vs. 28.6 min, < 0.001). With a median retention time of 6.3 months, the overall incidence rate of PC‐related complications is 21%, of which the most common complications are infections and venous thromboembolism (7.9% for each). Most patients (86.8%) with intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation have completed the whole chemotherapy successfully. Due to the general anesthesia and shorter time consuming, intraoperative implantation gains significantly more patients' satisfaction.

          Conclusions

          In the present study, we develop a SOP for intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation in resectable breast cancer patients, which is noval, convenient, and safe. In selected breast cancer patients with indications for adjuvant chemotherapy, this practice could significantly shorten the time consuming of PC implantation and improve the degree of patients' satisfaction.

          Abstract

          In the present study, we established a standard operating procedure (SOP) of intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation and conducted a prospective study in selected resectable breast cancer patients to assess its safety and complications. Compared with conventional contralateral PC implantation under local anaesthesia, SOP for intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian PC implantation significantly shortens the time consuming (11.6 vs. 28.6 min, p < 0.001). Due to the general anesthesia and shorter time consuming, intraoperative implantation gains significantly more favors in all aspects of patients’ satisfaction assessment. With a median retention time of 6.3 months, the overall incidence rate of PC‐related complications is acceptable, of which the most common complications are infections and venous thromboembolism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer statistics, 2020

          Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence. Incidence data (through 2016) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2017) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2020, 1,806,590 new cancer cases and 606,520 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. The cancer death rate rose until 1991, then fell continuously through 2017, resulting in an overall decline of 29% that translates into an estimated 2.9 million fewer cancer deaths than would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. This progress is driven by long-term declines in death rates for the 4 leading cancers (lung, colorectal, breast, prostate); however, over the past decade (2008-2017), reductions slowed for female breast and colorectal cancers, and halted for prostate cancer. In contrast, declines accelerated for lung cancer, from 3% annually during 2008 through 2013 to 5% during 2013 through 2017 in men and from 2% to almost 4% in women, spurring the largest ever single-year drop in overall cancer mortality of 2.2% from 2016 to 2017. Yet lung cancer still caused more deaths in 2017 than breast, prostate, colorectal, and brain cancers combined. Recent mortality declines were also dramatic for melanoma of the skin in the wake of US Food and Drug Administration approval of new therapies for metastatic disease, escalating to 7% annually during 2013 through 2017 from 1% during 2006 through 2010 in men and women aged 50 to 64 years and from 2% to 3% in those aged 20 to 49 years; annual declines of 5% to 6% in individuals aged 65 years and older are particularly striking because rates in this age group were increasing prior to 2013. It is also notable that long-term rapid increases in liver cancer mortality have attenuated in women and stabilized in men. In summary, slowing momentum for some cancers amenable to early detection is juxtaposed with notable gains for other common cancers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Breast Cancer Treatment

            Breast cancer will be diagnosed in 12% of women in the United States over the course of their lifetimes and more than 250 000 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the United States in 2017. This review focuses on current approaches and evolving strategies for local and systemic therapy of breast cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Progress in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: an overview

              Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer and cancer death worldwide. Although most patients present with localized breast cancer and may be rendered disease-free with local therapy, distant recurrence is common and is the primary cause of death from the disease. Adjuvant systemic therapies are effective in reducing the risk of distant and local recurrence, including endocrine therapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and chemotherapy, even in patients at low risk of recurrence. The widespread use of adjuvant systemic therapy has contributed to reduced breast cancer mortality rates. Adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens have evolved from single alkylating agents to polychemotherapy regimens incorporating anthracyclines and/or taxanes. This review summarizes key milestones in the evolution of adjuvant systemic therapy in general, and adjuvant chemotherapy in particular. Although adjuvant treatments are routinely guided by predictive factors for endocrine therapy (hormone receptor expression) and anti-HER2 therapy (HER2 overexpression), predicting benefit from chemotherapy has been more challenging. Randomized studies are now in progress utilizing multiparameter gene expression assays that may more accurately select patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tangjun@sysucc.org.cn , xiexm@sysucc.org.cn
                tangjun@sysucc.org.cn
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                04 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 9
                : 23 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v9.23 )
                : 8970-8978
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Breast Oncology Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou Guangdong China
                [ 2 ] Department of Ultrasound Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou Guangdong China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jun Tang, Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, China.

                Email: tangjun@ 123456sysucc.org.cn

                Xiaoming Xie, Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, China.

                Email: xiexm@ 123456sysucc.org.cn

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-1574
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-2438
                Article
                CAM43595
                10.1002/cam4.3595
                7724495
                33145946
                769373ed-6204-4217-9219-c09b47fb0cf0
                © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 August 2020
                : 17 September 2020
                : 19 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 4952
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100003453;
                Award ID: 2018A0303130285
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.5 mode:remove_FC converted:09.12.2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                breast cancer,chemotherapy,clinical practice,intra‐operation ipsilateral implantation,port catheter

                Comments

                Comment on this article