18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison study of the axial length measured using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography ANTERION and the partial coherence interferometry IOL Master

      research-article
      , , , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To compare a biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based biometer in measurements of two ocular biometry parameters, i.e., the axial length and anterior cornea curvature.

          Methods

          We compared the two biometers SS-OCT (ANTERION, Heidelberg Engineering Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) and PCI (IOL Master, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) in terms of the axial length (AL) and corneal curvature (K) measurements of 175 eyes. Paired t-tests were used to compare the two biometers. Agreement between the biometers was evaluated using the Bland–Altman method.

          Results

          The mean age was 36.0 ± 25.6 years (range: 5 to 85 years). The mean axial length was 24.42 ± 0.13 mm for SS-OCT and 24.45 ± 0.14 mm for PCI. The mean corneal curvature was significantly different between the two biometry in flat K (K1) but not in steep K (K2). The limit of agreement was -0.15 to 0.21 in the axial length, -1.18 to 0.83 in K1, and -1.06 to 0.95 in K2. All above ocular biometric measurements between SS-OCT and PCI correlated significantly (Pearson's correlation, p<0.001).

          Conclusions

          The axial length measured using SS-OCT is useful in clinical practice. It shows a good correlation and agreement with that measured using PCI. However, the axial length and corneal curvature measured using SS-OCT cannot be used interchangeably with that measured using PCI in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.

          Myopia is a common cause of vision loss, with uncorrected myopia the leading cause of distance vision impairment globally. Individual studies show variations in the prevalence of myopia and high myopia between regions and ethnic groups, and there continues to be uncertainty regarding increasing prevalence of myopia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation.

              To identify and quantify sources of error in the refractive outcome of cataract surgery. AMO Groningen BV, Groningen, The Netherlands. Means and standard deviations (SDs) of parameters that influence refractive outcomes were taken or derived from the published literature to the extent available. To evaluate their influence on refraction, thick-lens ray tracing that allowed for asphericity was used. The numerical partial derivative of each parameter with respect to spectacle refraction was calculated. The product of the partial derivative and the SD for a parameter equates to its SD, expressed as spectacle diopters, which squared is the variance. The error contribution of a parameter is its variance relative to the sum of the variances of all parameters. Preoperative estimation of postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) position, postoperative refraction determination, and preoperative axial length (AL) measurement were the largest contributors of error (35%, 27%, and 17%, respectively), with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.6 diopter (D) for an eye of average dimensions. Pupil size variation in the population accounted for 8% of the error, and variability in IOL power, 1%. Improvement in refractive outcome requires better methods for predicting the postoperative IOL position. Measuring AL by partial coherence interferometry may be of benefit. Autorefraction increases precision in outcome measurement. Reducing these 3 major error sources with means available today reduces the MAE to 0.4 D. Using IOLs that compensate for the spherical aberration of the cornea would eliminate the influence of pupil size. Further improvement would require measuring the asphericity of the anterior surface and radius of the posterior surface of the cornea.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: Software
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Project administrationRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                31 December 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 12
                : e0244590
                Affiliations
                [001]Kim's Eye Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                Nicolaus Copernicus University, POLAND
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5433-3706
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2373-6240
                Article
                PONE-D-20-23847
                10.1371/journal.pone.0244590
                7775111
                33382814
                7693b43c-d2a5-4fde-bb2e-905fdd0735d8
                © 2020 Kim et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 2 August 2020
                : 14 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 11
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Cornea
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Cornea
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Head
                Eyes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Head
                Eyes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Eyes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Eyes
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Biostatistics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Eye Lens
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Eye Lens
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Computational Techniques
                Biometrics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Tomography
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Imaging Techniques
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Tomography
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Radiology and Imaging
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Tomography
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Ophthalmology
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Chemical Characterization
                Optical Analysis
                Refractive Index
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article