19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Food Consumption Determinants and Barriers for Healthy Eating at the Workplace—A University Setting †

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: A wide variety of social, cultural and economic factors may influence dietary patterns. This work aims to identify the main determinants of food consumption and barriers for healthy eating at the workplace, in a university setting. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 533 participants. Data were obtained through the application of a self-administered questionnaire that included socio-demographic information, food consumption determinants and the main perceived barriers for healthy eating at the workplace. Results: The respondents identified “price” (22.5%), “meal quality” (20.7%), and “location/distance” (16.5%). For women, the determinant “availability of healthy food options” was more important than for men ( p < 0.001). The food consumption determinants at the workplace most referred to by respondents were related to the nutritional value. Smell, taste, appearance and texture, and good value for money, were also considered important for choosing food at the workplace. Respondents referred to work commitments and lack of time as the main barriers for healthy eating at the workplace. Conclusions: Identification of determinants involved in food consumption, and the barriers for healthy eating, may contribute to a better definition of health promotion initiatives at the workplace aiming to improve nutritional intake.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries.

          Decades ago, discussion of an impending global pandemic of obesity was thought of as heresy. But in the 1970s, diets began to shift towards increased reliance upon processed foods, increased away-from-home food intake, and increased use of edible oils and sugar-sweetened beverages. Reductions in physical activity and increases in sedentary behavior began to be seen as well. The negative effects of these changes began to be recognized in the early 1990s, primarily in low- and middle-income populations, but they did not become clearly acknowledged until diabetes, hypertension, and obesity began to dominate the globe. Now, rapid increases in the rates of obesity and overweight are widely documented, from urban and rural areas in the poorest countries of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia to populations in countries with higher income levels. Concurrent rapid shifts in diet and activity are well documented as well. An array of large-scale programmatic and policy measures are being explored in a few countries; however, few countries are engaged in serious efforts to prevent the serious dietary challenges being faced. © 2012 International Life Sciences Institute.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases

            The pandemic of physical inactivity is associated with a range of chronic diseases and early deaths. Despite the well documented disease burden, the economic burden of physical inactivity remains unquantified at the global level. A better understanding of the economic burden could help to inform resource prioritisation and motivate efforts to increase levels of physical activity worldwide.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire.

              A number of factors are thought to influence people's dietary choices, including health, cost, convenience and taste, but there are no measures that address health-related and non-health-related factors in a systematic fashion. This paper describes the development of a multidimensional measure of motives related to food choice. The Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) was developed through factor analysis of responses from a sample of 358 adults ranging in age from 18 to 87 years. Nine factors emerged, and were labelled health, mood, convenience, sensory appeal, natural content, price, weight control, familiarity and ethical concern. The questionnaire structure was verified using confirmatory factor analysis in a second sample (n = 358), and test-retest reliability over a 2- to 3-week period was satisfactory. Convergent validity was investigated by testing associations between FCQ scales and measures of dietary restraint, eating style, the value of health, health locus of control and personality factors. Differences in motives for food choice associated with sex, age and income were found. The potential uses of this measure in health psychology and other areas are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Foods
                Foods
                foods
                Foods
                MDPI
                2304-8158
                25 March 2021
                April 2021
                : 10
                : 4
                : 695
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, Unidade Científico-Pedagógica de Dietética e Nutrição, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
                [2 ]GreenUPorto—Sustainable Agrifood Production Research Centre, Campus de Vairão Edifício de Ciências Agrárias (FCV2) Rua da Agrária, 747, 4485-646 Vairão, Portugal; adarocha@ 123456fcna.up.pt
                [3 ]LAQV-Requimte—R. D. Manuel II, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal
                [4 ]ciTechCare—Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, R. de Santo André 2410, 2410-541 Leiria, Portugal
                [5 ]Instituto de Saúde de Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas 135, 4050-091 Porto, Portugal; sofcosta1@ 123456sapo.pt
                [6 ]CBQF—Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemicals—Associate Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, Catholic University of Portugal, R. de Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal; tbrandao@ 123456porto.ucp.pt
                [7 ]Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal
                Author notes
                [†]

                The work was a part of João Lima’s doctoral thesis.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-0426
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3505-4538
                Article
                foods-10-00695
                10.3390/foods10040695
                8064356
                33805929
                76979b16-4817-4d42-9bc0-4cc208ff2c10
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 March 2021
                : 22 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                food choice,food consumption,university,workplace,determinants,barriers

                Comments

                Comment on this article