23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Staged Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

      review-article
      , MD, MSc 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 2 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 1 , , MD 5 , , MD 2 , , MD 2 , , MD 2 , , MD 6 , , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , MD, MPH 2 , , MD 7 ,
      Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      chronic total occlusion, meta‐analysis, percutaneous coronary intervention, ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, Catheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Revascularization

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Studies have shown that chronic total occlusion ( CTO) in a noninfarct‐related artery in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction is linked to increased mortality. It remains unclear whether staged revascularization of a noninfarct‐related artery CTO in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction translates to improved outcomes. We performed a meta‐analysis to compare outcomes between patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with concurrent CTO who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of noninfarct‐related artery CTO versus those who did not.

          Method and Results

          We conducted an electronic database search of all published data. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary end points were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, and heart failure readmission. Odds ratios ( ORs) and 95% confidence intervals ( CIs) were computed. Random effects model was used and heterogeneity was considered if I 2 >25. Six studies (n=1253 patients) were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events ( OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.91), cardiovascular mortality ( OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.95), and heart failure readmissions ( OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36–0.89), favoring the patients in the CTO percutaneous coronary intervention group. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for all‐cause mortality ( OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22–1.00), myocardial infarction ( OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.41–1.46), repeat revascularization ( OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.56–2.27), and stroke ( OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.20–1.33).

          Conclusions

          In this meta‐analysis, CTO percutaneous coronary intervention of the noninfarct‐related artery in patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure readmissions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions.

              Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) has been associated with clinical benefit. There are no randomized controlled trials on long-term clinical outcomes after CTO PCI, limiting the available evidence to observational cohort studies. We sought to perform a weighted meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of successful versus failed CTO PCI. A total of 25 studies, published from 1990 to 2014, with 28,486 patients (29,315 CTO PCI procedures) were included. We analyzed data on mortality, subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, angina pectoris, stroke, and target vessel revascularization using random-effects models. Procedural success was 71% (range 51% to 87%). During a weighted mean follow-up of 3.11 years, compared with unsuccessful, successful CTO PCI was associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.63), less residual angina (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60), lower risk for stroke (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.88), less need for subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.22), and lower risk for major adverse cardiac events (0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.79). There was no difference in the incidence of target vessel revascularization (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.23) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.03). Outcomes were similar in patients who underwent balloon angioplasty only or stenting with bare metal or drug-eluting stents. Compared with failed procedures, successful CTO PCIs are associated with a lower risk of death, stroke, and coronary artery bypass grafting and less recurrent angina pectoris.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ankur.kalra@uhhospitals.org
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                13 April 2018
                17 April 2018
                : 7
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.2018.7.issue-8 )
                : e008415
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine New York University School of Medicine New York NY
                [ 2 ] Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York NY
                [ 3 ] Department of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH
                [ 4 ] Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami FL
                [ 5 ] Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA
                [ 6 ] Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology Mayo Clinic Phoenix AZ
                [ 7 ] Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland OH
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Ankur Kalra, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Mailstop LKS 5038, Cleveland, OH 44106. Email: ankur.kalra@ 123456uhhospitals.org
                Article
                JAH33120
                10.1161/JAHA.117.008415
                6015413
                29654206
                769ae62d-6cbb-4e83-b4a9-5a6cbb873824
                © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 23 December 2017
                : 26 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 10, Words: 6791
                Categories
                Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
                Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jah33120
                17 April 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.4 mode:remove_FC converted:17.04.2018

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                chronic total occlusion,meta‐analysis,percutaneous coronary intervention,st‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction,catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions,revascularization

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content202

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors1,008