41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Teachers’ conceptions of learning and teaching in student-centred medical curricula: the impact of context and personal characteristics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Gibbs and Coffey (2004) have reported that teaching practices are influenced by teachers’ conceptions of learning and teaching. In our previous research we found significant differences between teachers’ conceptions in two medical schools with student-centred education. Medical school was the most important predictor, next to discipline, gender and teaching experience. Our research questions for the current study are (1) which specific elements of medical school explain the effect of medical school on teachers' conceptions of learning and teaching? How? and (2) which contextual and personal characteristics are related to conceptions of learning and teaching? How?

          Methods

          Individual interviews were conducted with 13 teachers of the undergraduate curricula in two medical schools. Previously their conceptions of learning and teaching were assessed with the COLT questionnaire. We investigated the meanings they attached to context and personal characteristics, in relation to their conceptions of learning and teaching. We used a template analysis.

          Results

          Large individual differences existed between teachers. Characteristics mentioned at the medical school and curriculum level were ‘curriculum tradition’, ‘support by educational department’ and ‘management and finances’. Other contextual characteristics were ‘leadership style’ at all levels but especially of department chairs, ‘affordances and support’, ‘support and relatedness’, and ‘students’ characteristics’. Personal characteristics were ‘agency’, ‘experience with PBL (as a student or a teacher)’,’personal development’, ‘motivation and work engagement’and ‘high content expertise’.

          Conclusion

          Several context and personal characteristics associated with teachers’ conceptions were identified, enabling a broader view on faculty development with attention for these characteristics, next to teaching skills.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0767-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Professional Development and Teacher Change

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research.

              Problem-based learning (PBL) is widely used in higher education. There is evidence available that students and faculty are highly satisfied with PBL. Nevertheless, in educational practice problems are often encountered, such as tutors who are too directive, problems that are too well-structured, and dysfunctional tutorial groups. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that PBL has the potential to prepare students more effectively for future learning because it is based on four modern insights into learning: constructive, self-directed, collaborative and contextual. These four learning principles are described and it is explained how they apply to PBL. In addition, available research is reviewed and the current debate in research on PBL is described. It is argued that problems encountered in educational practice usually stem from poor implementation of PBL. In many cases the way in which PBL is implemented is not consistent with the current insights on learning. Furthermore, it is argued that research on PBL should contribute towards a better understanding of why and how the concepts of constructive, self-directed, collaborative and contextual learning work or do not work and under what circumstances. Examples of studies are given to illustrate this issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (0031) 204445129 , a.jacobs@vumc.nl
                sj.van.luijk@mumc.nl
                c.vandervleuten@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                r.kusurkar@vumc.nl
                g.croiset@vumc.nl
                f.scheele@olvg.nl
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                21 September 2016
                21 September 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 244
                Affiliations
                [1 ]VUmc School of Medical Sciences , Amsterdam & LEARN! Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]VUmc School of Medical Sciences, VU University Medical Center & LEARN! Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]VU University and OLVG-West Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                767
                10.1186/s12909-016-0767-1
                5031323
                27653777
                76b92508-2120-4d13-8b8f-4a072ab8d405
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 2 April 2016
                : 15 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: not applicable
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Education
                conceptions of learning and teaching,faculty development,personal characteristics,student-centred curricula,teaching context

                Comments

                Comment on this article