5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety and Immunogenicity of Early Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Vaccination in Infants Who Are Preterm and/or Have Low Birth Weights : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article
      , MRCPCH 1 , 2 , 3 , , , DPhil 4 , , MRCPCH 5 , , FCPaed 6 , , FMedSci 7 , 8 , 9
      JAMA Pediatrics
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is administration of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination within 7 days of birth safe, immunogenic, and efficacious in infants who are preterm and/or have low birth weight, compared with BCG vaccination at later points or in infants who are normal birth weight?

          Findings

          In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no increase in adverse reactions or infant mortality after BCG vaccination within 7 days of birth compared with vaccination delayed after 7 days in clinically stable infants who were preterm and/or had low birth weight. Meta-analysis revealed no differences for scar formation or tuberculin skin test conversion.

          Meaning

          Currently, evidence from clinically stable infants who were born after more than 30 weeks’ gestational age and/or weighing more than 1.5 kg seems to support BCG vaccination within 7 days of birth.

          Abstract

          This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the safety and efficacy of bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination at birth or later points in infants who are preterm and/or had low birth weights compared with ones who are full term and/or had normal birth weights.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination is commonly delayed in infants who are preterm and have low birth weights (LBW) despite the association of early vaccination with better vaccination coverage and potentially nonspecific benefits for survival.

          Objective

          To determine the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy against tuberculosis (TB) of BCG vaccination given at or before 7 days after birth vs vaccination more than 7 days after birth among infants who are preterm and/or had LBW.

          Data Sources

          Searches of Medline, Embase, and Global Health databases were conducted from inception until August 8, 2017.

          Study Selection

          Clinical trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that included infants who were preterm and/or had LBW and reported safety, mortality, immunogenicity, proxies of vaccine take, and/or efficacy against TB.

          Data Extraction and Synthesis

          Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies. Data extracted included demographics, covariates, sources of bias, and effect estimates. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Safety, mortality, immunogenicity, or other proxies of vaccine take, such as tuberculin skin test (TST) conversion and efficacy against tuberculosis.

          Results

          Forty studies were included in a qualitative synthesis; infants who were preterm (born at 26-37 weeks’ gestational age) and/or had LBW (0.69-2.5 kg at birth) were included. The BCG vaccine was administered at or before 7 days to 10 568 clinically stable infants who were preterm and/or had LBW; vaccination was administered to 4310 infants at varying times between 8 days and 12 months after birth. Twenty-one studies reporting safety found no cases of BCG-associated death or systemic disease in 8243 infants. Four studies reported no increase in all-cause mortality for infants who had LBW and who received early BCG vaccination compared with infants who had LBW with later vaccination or BCG-vaccinated infants of normal birth weight. Four studies reported lymphadenitis incidence; combined, these reported 0% to 2.9% incidence of vaccination within 7 days and 0% to 4.2% of vaccination after 7 days. Meta-analysis of 7 studies revealed no differences between early and delayed BCG vaccination for scar formation (n = 515; relative risk [RR], 1.01 [95% CI, 0.95-1.07]) or TST conversion (n = 397; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.84-1.13]). Published data were insufficient to assess immunogenicity or protective efficacy against TB disease.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Early BCG vaccination in healthy infants who are preterm and/or had LBW has a similar safety profile, reactogenicity, and TST conversion rate as delayed vaccination. Based on current evidence, early BCG vaccination in stable infants who are preterm and/or have LBW to optimize uptake is warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Protection by BCG Vaccine Against Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

            Randomized trials assessing BCG vaccine protection against tuberculosis have widely varying results, for reasons that are not well understood. We examined associations of trial setting and design with BCG efficacy against pulmonary and miliary or meningeal tuberculosis by conducting a systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression. We identified 18 trials reporting pulmonary tuberculosis and 6 reporting miliary or meningeal tuberculosis. Univariable meta-regression indicated efficacy against pulmonary tuberculosis varied according to 3 characteristics. Protection appeared greatest in children stringently tuberculin tested, to try to exclude prior infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or sensitization to environmental mycobacteria (rate ratio [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], .18-.37), or infants (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, .29-.58). Protection was weaker in children not stringently tested (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, .35-1.01) and older individuals stringently or not stringently tested (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, .59-1.31 and RR, 0.81; 95% CI, .55-1.22, respectively). Protection was higher in trials further from the equator where environmental mycobacteria are less and with lower risk of diagnostic detection bias. These associations were attenuated in a multivariable model, but each had an independent effect. There was no evidence that efficacy was associated with BCG strain. Protection against meningeal and miliary tuberculosis was also high in infants (RR, 0.1; 95% CI, .01-.77) and children stringently tuberculin tested (RR, 0.08; 95% CI, .03-.25). Absence of prior M. tuberculosis infection or sensitization with environmental mycobacteria is associated with higher efficacy of BCG against pulmonary tuberculosis and possibly against miliary and meningeal tuberculosis. Evaluations of new tuberculosis vaccines should account for the possibility that prior infection may mask or block their effects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis

              Objectives To determine whether BCG vaccination protects against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection as assessed by interferon γ release assays (IGRA) in children. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Searches of electronic databases 1950 to November 2013, checking of reference lists, hand searching of journals, and contact with experts. Setting Community congregate settings and households. Inclusion criteria Vaccinated and unvaccinated children aged under 16 with known recent exposure to patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Children were screened for infection with M tuberculosis with interferon γ release assays. Data extraction Study results relating to diagnostic accuracy were extracted and risk estimates were combined with random effects meta-analysis. Results The primary analysis included 14 studies and 3855 participants. The estimated overall risk ratio was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.92), indicating a protective efficacy of 19% against infection among vaccinated children after exposure compared with unvaccinated children. The observed protection was similar when estimated with the two types of interferon γ release assays (ELISpot or QuantiFERON). Restriction of the analysis to the six studies (n=1745) with information on progression to active tuberculosis at the time of screening showed protection against infection of 27% (risk ratio 0.73, 0.61 to 0.87) compared with 71% (0.29, 0.15 to 0.58) against active tuberculosis. Among those infected, protection against progression to disease was 58% (0.42, 0.23 to 0.77). Conclusions BCG protects against M tuberculosis infection as well as progression from infection to disease. Trial registration PROSPERO registration No CRD42011001698 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Pediatr
                JAMA Pediatr
                JAMA Pediatr
                JAMA Pediatrics
                American Medical Association
                2168-6203
                2168-6211
                26 November 2018
                January 2019
                26 November 2018
                : 173
                : 1
                : 75-85
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ]Children’s Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Children’s Services, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Services Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Department of Paediatrics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital National Health Services Trust, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom
                [6 ]South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
                [7 ]KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
                [8 ]The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya
                [9 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Corresponding Author: Shiraz Badurdeen, MRCPCH, Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Rd, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia ( sb470@ 123456doctors.org.uk ).
                Accepted for Publication: September 19, 2018.
                Published Online: November 26, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4038
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2018 Badurdeen S et al. JAMA Pediatrics.
                Author Contributions : Dr Badurdeen had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Badurdeen, Berkley.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Badurdeen, Marshall, Daish, Berkley.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Badurdeen, Marshall, Hatherill, Berkley.
                Statistical analysis: Badurdeen, Daish, Berkley.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Badurdeen, Marshall, Berkley.
                Supervision: Berkley.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Medical Research Council/Department for International Development/Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme (Dr Berkley).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                poi180075
                10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4038
                6583455
                30476973
                76e030cb-efae-464b-ad5e-3257584173b0
                Copyright 2018 Badurdeen S et al. JAMA Pediatrics.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 8 June 2018
                : 17 September 2018
                : 19 September 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content124

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors939