There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Although there is much in the literature regarding pin site infections, there is no
accepted, validated method for documenting their state. We present a system for reliably
labelling pin sites on any ring fixator construct and an easy-to-remember grading
system to document the state of each pin site. Each site is graded in terms of erythema,
pain and discharge to give a 3-point scale, named "Good", "Bad" and "Ugly" for ease
of recall. This system was tested for intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. 15
patients undergoing elective limb reconstruction were recruited. A total of 218 pin
sites were independently scored by 2 examiners. 82 were then re-examined later by
the same examiners. 514 pin sites were felt to be "Good", 80 "Bad" and 6 "Ugly". The
reproducibility of the system was found to be excellent. We feel our system gives
a quick, reliable and reproducible method to monitor individual pin sites and their
response to treatment.