8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the design of EEG-based movement decoders for completely paralyzed stroke patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Brain machine interface (BMI) technology has demonstrated its efficacy for rehabilitation of paralyzed chronic stroke patients. The critical component in BMI-training consists of the associative connection (contingency) between the intention and the feedback provided. However, the relationship between the BMI design and its performance in stroke patients is still an open question.

          Methods

          In this study we compare different methodologies to design a BMI for rehabilitation and evaluate their effects on movement intention decoding performance. We analyze the data of 37 chronic stroke patients who underwent 4 weeks of BMI intervention with different types of association between their brain activity and the proprioceptive feedback. We simulate the pseudo-online performance that a BMI would have under different conditions, varying: (1) the cortical source of activity (i.e., ipsilesional, contralesional, bihemispheric), (2) the type of spatial filter applied, (3) the EEG frequency band, (4) the type of classifier; and also evaluated the use of residual EMG activity to decode the movement intentions.

          Results

          We observed a significant influence of the different BMI designs on the obtained performances. Our results revealed that using bihemispheric beta activity with a common average reference and an adaptive support vector machine led to the best classification results. Furthermore, the decoding results based on brain activity were significantly higher than those based on muscle activity.

          Conclusions

          This paper underscores the relevance of the different parameters used to decode movement, using EEG in severely paralyzed stroke patients. We demonstrated significant differences in performance for the different designs, which supports further research that should elucidate if those approaches leading to higher accuracies also induce higher motor recovery in paralyzed stroke patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.

          Many laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces

            In this paper we review classification algorithms used to design brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG). We briefly present the commonly employed algorithms and describe their critical properties. Based on the literature, we compare them in terms of performance and provide guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update

              Most current electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are based on machine learning algorithms. There is a large diversity of classifier types that are used in this field, as described in our 2007 review paper. Now, approximately ten years after this review publication, many new algorithms have been developed and tested to classify EEG signals in BCIs. The time is therefore ripe for an updated review of EEG classification algorithms for BCIs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                spueler@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
                eduardo.lopez-larraz@uni-tuebingen.de
                ander.ramos-murguialday@uni-tuebingen.de
                Journal
                J Neuroeng Rehabil
                J Neuroeng Rehabil
                Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
                BioMed Central (London )
                1743-0003
                20 November 2018
                20 November 2018
                2018
                : 15
                : 110
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2190 1447, GRID grid.10392.39, Department of Computer Engineering, Wilhelm-Schickard-Institute, , University of Tübingen, ; Sand 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2190 1447, GRID grid.10392.39, Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, , University of Tübingen, ; Silcherstr. 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1764 7775, GRID grid.13753.33, TECNALIA, Health Technologies, Neural Enginering Laboratory, ; Mikeletegi Pasalekua 1, 20009 San Sebastian, Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-4029
                Article
                438
                10.1186/s12984-018-0438-z
                6247630
                30458838
                776b2fed-5559-4dad-8e4d-789f95306a01
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 April 2018
                : 17 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008316, Baden-Württemberg Stiftung;
                Award ID: GRUENS ROB-1
                Award ID: GRUENS ROB-1
                Award ID: GRUENS ROB-1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: SP 1533/2-1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (DE)
                Award ID: MOTORBIC FKZ 13GW0053
                Award ID: AMORSA FKZ 16SV7754
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung;
                Award ID: MOTORBIC FKZ 13GW0053
                Award ID: MOTORBIC FKZ 13GW0053
                Award ID: AMORSA FKZ 16SV7754
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Fortune program, University of Tübingen (DE)
                Award ID: 2422-0-0
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Fortune program, Unversity of Tübingen (DE)
                Award ID: 2452-0-0
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Neurosciences
                neuroprostheses,brain machine interface (bmi),rehabilitation robotics,proprioceptive feedback, motor rehabilitation, stroke, neurotechnology

                Comments

                Comment on this article