26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Planning and Control Model (PCM) of Motorvisual Priming : Reconciling Motorvisual Impairment and Facilitation Effects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Previous research on dual-tasks has shown that, under some circumstances, actions impair the perception of action-consistent stimuli, whereas, under other conditions, actions facilitate the perception of action-consistent stimuli. We propose a new model to reconcile these contrasting findings. The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming proposes that action planning binds categorical representations of action features so that their availability for perceptual processing is inhibited. Thus, the perception of categorically action-consistent stimuli is impaired during action planning. Movement control processes, on the other hand, integrate multi-sensory spatial information about the movement and, therefore, facilitate perceptual processing of spatially movement-consistent stimuli. We show that the PCM is consistent with a wider range of empirical data than previous models on motorvisual priming. Furthermore, the model yields previously untested empirical predictions. We also discuss how the PCM relates to motorvisual research paradigms other than dual-tasks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references134

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

          The spatial interaction of visual attention and saccadic eye movements was investigated in a dual-task paradigm that required a target-directed saccade in combination with a letter discrimination task. Subjects had to saccade to locations within horizontal letter strings left and right of a central fixation cross. The performance in discriminating between the symbols "E" and "E", presented tachistoscopically before the saccade within the surrounding distractors was taken as a measure of visual attention. The data show that visual discrimination is best when discrimination stimulus and saccade target refer to the same object; discrimination at neighboring items is close to chance level. Also, it is not possible, in spite of prior knowledge of discrimination target position, to direct attention to the discrimination target while saccading to a spatially close saccade target. The data strongly argue for an obligatory and selective coupling of saccade programming and visual attention to one common target object. The results favor a model in which a single attentional mechanism selects objects for perceptual processing and recognition, and also provides the information necessary for motor action.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

            The classic problem of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility (SRC) is addressed. A cognitive model is proposed that views the stimulus and response sets in S-R ensembles as categories with dimensions that may or may not overlap. If they do overlap, the task may be compatible or incompatible, depending on the assigned S-R mapping. If they do not overlap, the task is noncompatible regardless of the assigned mapping. The overlapping dimensions may be relevant or not. The model provides a systematic account of SRC effects, a taxonomy of simple performance tasks that were hitherto thought to be unrelated, and suggestive parallels between these tasks and the experimental paradigms that have traditionally been used to study attentional, controlled, and automatic processes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An interference effect of observed biological movement on action.

              It has been proposed that actions are intrinsically linked to perception and that imagining, observing, preparing, or in any way representing an action excites the motor programs used to execute that same action. There is neurophysiological evidence that certain brain regions involved in executing actions are activated by the mere observation of action (the so-called "mirror system;" ). However, it is unknown whether this mirror system causes interference between observed and simultaneously executed movements. In this study we test the hypothesis that, because of the overlap between action observation and execution, observed actions should interfere with incongruous executed actions. Subjects made arm movements while observing either a robot or another human making the same or qualitatively different arm movements. Variance in the executed movement was measured as an index of interference to the movement. The results demonstrate that observing another human making incongruent movements has a significant interference effect on executed movements. However, we found no evidence that this interference effect occurred when subjects observed a robotic arm making incongruent movements. These results suggest that the simultaneous activation of the overlapping neural networks that process movement observation and execution infers a measurable cost to motor control.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychol Rev
                Psychol Rev
                Psychological Review
                American Psychological Association
                0033-295X
                1939-1471
                April 2012
                February 27 2012
                : 119
                : 2
                : 388-407
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
                [3 ]School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Roland Thomaschke, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Angewandte Psychologie, Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstraβe 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany E-mail: Roland.Thomaschke@ 123456psychologie.uni-regensburg.de
                Article
                rev_119_2_388 2012-05217-001
                10.1037/a0027453
                3936358
                22369178
                7778d981-a769-4194-9a6d-633c84d6ead2
                © 2012 American Psychological Association.

                This article, manuscript, or document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association (APA). For non-commercial, education and research purposes, users may access, download, copy, display, and redistribute this article or manuscript as well as adapt, translate, or data and text mine the content contained in this document. For any such use of this document, appropriate attribution or bibliographic citation must be given. Users should not delete any copyright notices or disclaimers. For more information or to obtain permission beyond that granted here, visit http://www.apa.org/about/copyright.html.

                History
                : 28 May 2011
                : 4 January 2012
                : 20 January 2012
                Categories
                Articles

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                dual-tasks,motorvisual,action planning,movement control
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                dual-tasks, motorvisual, action planning, movement control

                Comments

                Comment on this article