10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2019 revision

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal Disorders: 2010 Revision

          Genetic disorders involving the skeletal system arise through disturbances in the complex processes of skeletal development, growth and homeostasis and remain a diagnostic challenge because of their variety. The Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal Disorders provides an overview of recognized diagnostic entities and groups them by clinical and radiographic features and molecular pathogenesis. The aim is to provide the Genetics, Pediatrics and Radiology community with a list of recognized genetic skeletal disorders that can be of help in the diagnosis of individual cases, in the delineation of novel disorders, and in building bridges between clinicians and scientists interested in skeletal biology. In the 2010 revision, 456 conditions were included and placed in 40 groups defined by molecular, biochemical, and/or radiographic criteria. Of these conditions, 316 were associated with mutations in one or more of 226 different genes, ranging from common, recurrent mutations to “private” found in single families or individuals. Thus, the Nosology is a hybrid between a list of clinically defined disorders, waiting for molecular clarification, and an annotated database documenting the phenotypic spectrum produced by mutations in a given gene. The Nosology should be useful for the diagnosis of patients with genetic skeletal diseases, particularly in view of the information flood expected with the novel sequencing technologies; in the delineation of clinical entities and novel disorders, by providing an overview of established nosologic entities; and for scientists looking for the clinical correlates of genes, proteins and pathways involved in skeletal biology. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2006 revision.

            The objective of the paper is to provide the revision of the Nosology of Constitutional Disorders of Bone that incorporates newly recognized disorders and reflects new molecular and pathogenetic concepts. Criteria for inclusion of disorders were (1) significant skeletal involvement corresponding to the definition of skeletal dysplasias, metabolic bone disorders, dysostoses, and skeletal malformation and/or reduction syndromes, (2) publication and/or MIM listing, (3) genetic basis proven or very likely, and (4) nosologic autonomy confirmed by molecular or linkage analysis and/or distinctive diagnostic features and observation in multiple individuals or families. Three hundred seventy-two different conditions were included and placed in 37 groups defined by molecular, biochemical and/or radiographic criteria. Of these conditions, 215 were associated with one or more of 140 different genes. Nosologic status was classified as final (mutations or locus identified), probable (pedigree evidence), or bona fide (multiple observations and clear diagnostic criteria, but no pedigree or locus evidence yet). The number of recognized genetic disorders with a significant skeletal component is growing and the distinction between dysplasias, metabolic bone disorders, dysostoses, and malformation syndromes is blurring. For classification purposes, pathogenetic and molecular criteria are integrating with morphological ones but disorders are still identified by clinical features and radiographic appearance. Molecular evidence leads to confirmation of individual entities and to the constitution of new groups, but also allows for delineation of related but distinct entities and indicates a previously unexpected heterogeneity of molecular mechanisms; thus, molecular evidence does not necessarily simplify the Nosology, and a further increase in the number of entities and growing complexity is expected. By providing an updated overview of recognized entities with skeletal involvement and of the underlying gene defects, the new Nosology can provide practical diagnostic help, facilitate the recognition of new entities, and foster and direct research in skeletal biology and genetic disorders. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gain-of-function mutation of microRNA-140 in human skeletal dysplasia

              MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression. Heterozygous loss-of-function point mutations of miRNA genes are associated with several human congenital disorders 1–5 , but neomorphic (gain-of-new-function) mutations in miRNAs due to nucleotide substitutions have not been reported. Here we describe a neomorphic seed region mutation in the chondrocyte-specific, super-enhancer-associated MIR140 encoding microRNA-140 (miR-140) in a novel autosomal dominant human skeletal dysplasia. Mice with the corresponding single nucleotide substitution show skeletal abnormalities similar to those of the patients but distinct from those of miR-140-null mice 6 . This mutant miRNA gene yields abundant mutant miR-140-5p expression without miRNA-processing defects. In chondrocytes, the mutation causes widespread derepression of wild-type miR-140-5p targets and repression of mutant miR-140-5p targets, indicating that the mutation produces both loss-of-function and gain-of-function effects. Furthermore, the mutant miR-140-5p seed competes with the conserved RNA-binding protein Ybx1 for overlapping binding sites. This finding may explain the potent target repression and robust in vivo effect by this mutant miRNA even in the absence of evolutionary selection of miRNA-target RNA interactions, which contributes to the strong regulatory effects of conserved miRNAs 7,8 . Our study presents the first case of a pathogenic gain-of-function miRNA mutation and provides molecular insight into neomorphic actions of emerging and/or mutant miRNAs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
                Am J Med Genet
                Wiley
                1552-4825
                1552-4833
                November 10 2019
                December 2019
                October 21 2019
                December 2019
                : 179
                : 12
                : 2393-2419
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical GeneticsAntwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium
                [2 ]Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology and Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of California at Los Angeles Los Angeles California
                [3 ]IMAGINE InstituteHôpital Necker Enfants Malades Paris France
                [4 ]Department of RadiologyGreat Ormond Street Hospital London UK
                [5 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Human GeneticsUniversity of California at Los Angeles Los Angeles California
                [6 ]Institute for Medical Genetics and Human GeneticsCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
                [7 ]Department of RadiologyTokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center Tokyo Japan
                [8 ]Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Dunedin School of MedicineOtago University Dunedin New Zealand
                [9 ]Department of Medical Genetics and Skeletal Rare DiseasesIRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute Bologna Italy
                [10 ]Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
                [11 ]Discipline of Genomic Medicine, the Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Medical SchoolUniversity of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
                [12 ]Medical Genetics Service, CHUVUniversity of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
                [13 ]Orthopaedic Research LaboratoriesBoston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
                Article
                10.1002/ajmg.a.61366
                31633310
                778b383a-409f-443c-953b-a668e44c9fa5
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article