6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trends in Swedish physicians’ attitudes towards physician-assisted suicide: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To examine attitudes towards physician-assisted suicide (PAS) among physicians in Sweden and compare these with the results from a similar cross-sectional study performed in 2007.

          Participants

          A random selection of 250 physicians from each of six specialties (general practice, geriatrics, internal medicine, oncology, surgery and psychiatry) and all 127 palliative care physicians in Sweden were invited to participate in this study.

          Setting

          A postal questionnaire commissioned by the Swedish Medical Society in collaboration with Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

          Results

          The total response rate was 59.2%. Slightly fewer than half [47.1% (95% CI 43.7–50.5)] of the respondents from the six specialties accepted PAS, which is significantly more than accepted PAS in the 2007 study [34.9% (95% CI 31.5–38.3)]. Thirty-three percent of respondents were prepared to prescribe the needed drugs. When asked what would happen to the respondent’s own trust in healthcare, a majority [67.1% (95% CI 63.9–70.3)] stated that legalizing PAS would either not influence their own trust in healthcare, or that their trust would increase. This number is an increase compared to the 2007 survey, when just over half [51.9% (95% CI 48.0–55.2)] indicated that their own trust would either not be influenced, or would increase.

          Conclusions

          The study reveals a shift towards a more accepting attitude concerning PAS among physicians in Sweden. Only a minority of the respondents stated that they were against PAS, and a considerable proportion reported being prepared to prescribe the needed drugs for patient self-administration if PAS were legalized.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe.

          The increasing legalization of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide worldwide makes it important to understand related attitudes and practices.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assisted dying around the world: a status quaestionis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Attitudes towards assisted dying are influenced by question wording and order: a survey experiment

              Background Surveys on attitudes towards assisted dying play an important role in informing public debate, policy and legislation. Unfortunately, surveys are often designed with insufficient attention to framing effects; that is, effects on the respondents’ stated attitudes caused by question wording and context. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and measure such framing effects. Methods Survey experiment in which an eight-question survey on attitudes towards assisted dying was distributed to Norwegian citizens through a web-based panel. Two variations of question wording as well as two variations of question order were employed. Respondents were randomized to receive one of four questionnaire versions. Results Three thousand and fifty responses were received. There were moderate to large question wording and question order effects. A majority of Norwegian citizens favour the legalization of assisted dying for patients with terminal or chronic disease. Conclusions Stakeholders in the assisted dying debate need to acknowledge potential framing effects, and accordingly should interpret survey results with caution. The same holds for researchers who conduct attitude surveys in the field of bioethics. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0107-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                niels.lynoe@ki.se
                Journal
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Medical Ethics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6939
                2 July 2021
                2 July 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 86
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Centre for Healthcare Ethics, , Karolinska Institute, ; 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.15895.30, ISNI 0000 0001 0738 8966, University Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, , Örebro University, ; Örebro, Sweden
                [3 ]GRID grid.12650.30, ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, Department of Clinical Science/Psychiatry, , Umeå University, ; 90185 Umeå, Sweden
                Article
                652
                10.1186/s12910-021-00652-0
                8252981
                34215231
                779ba626-8ef5-4169-83b7-910067c260ca
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 30 March 2021
                : 16 June 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Karolinska Institute
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Medicine
                physician assisted suicide,physician attitude,prescribing drugs,trust in healthcare,non-maleficent principle,autonomy principle

                Comments

                Comment on this article