41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      In vitro and in vivo activity and cross resistance profiles of novel ruthenium (II) organometallic arene complexes in human ovarian cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ruthenium complexes offer the potential of reduced toxicity, a novel mechanism of action, non-cross resistance and a different spectrum of activity compared to platinum containing compounds. Thirteen novel ruthenium(II) organometallic arene complexes have been evaluated for activity ( in vitro and in vivo) in models of human ovarian cancer, and cross-resistance profiles established in cisplatin and multi-drug-resistant variants. A broad range of IC 50 values was obtained (0.5 to >100 μ M) in A2780 parental cells with two compounds (RM175 and HC29) equipotent to carboplatin (6 μ M), and the most active compound (HC11) equipotent to cisplatin (0.6 μ M). Stable bi-dentate chelating ligands (ethylenediamine), a more hydrophobic arene ligand (tetrahydroanthracene) and a single ligand exchange centre (chloride) were associated with increased activity. None of the six active ruthenium(II) compounds were cross-resistant in the A2780cis cell line, demonstrated to be 10-fold resistant to cisplatin/carboplatin by a mechanism involving, at least in part, silencing of MLH1 protein expression via methylation. Varying degrees of cross-resistance were observed in the P-170 glycoprotein overexpressing multi-drug-resistant cell line 2780 AD that could be reversed by co-treatment with verapamil. In vivo activity was established with RM175 in the A2780 xenograft together with non-cross-resistance in the A2780cis xenograft and a lack of activity in the 2780 AD xenograft. High activity coupled to non cross-resistance in cisplatin resistant models merit further development of this novel group of anticancer compounds.

          British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 1652–1657. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600290 www.bjcancer.com

          © 2002 Cancer Research UK

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Structure, Recognition, and Processing of Cisplatin-DNA Adducts.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The biochemistry of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Inhibition of cancer cell growth by ruthenium(II) arene complexes.

              Inhibition of the growth of the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 by organometallic ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [(eta(6)-arene)Ru(X)(Y)(Z)], where arene is benzene or substituted benzene, X, Y, and Z are halide, acetonitrile, or isonicotinamide, or X,Y is ethylenediamine (en) or N-ethylethylenediamine, has been investigated. The X-ray crystal structures of the complexes [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(en)Cl]PF(6) (5), [(eta(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(2)(isonicotinamide)] (7), and [(eta(6)-biphenyl)Ru(en)Cl]PF(6) (9) are reported. They have "piano stool" geometries with eta(6) coordination of the arene ligand. Complexes with X,Y as a chelated en ligand and Z as a monofunctional leaving group had the highest activity. Complexes 5, 6 (the iodo analogue of 5), 9, and 10 (ethylethylenediamine analogue of 9) were as active as carboplatin. Hydrolysis of the reactive Ru-Cl bond in complex 5 was detected by HPLC but was suppressed by the addition of chloride ions. Complex 5 binds strongly and selectively to G bases on DNA oligonucleotides to form monofunctional adducts. No inhibition of topoisomerase I or II by complexes 5, 6, or 9 was detected. These chelated Ru(II) arene complexes have potential as novel metal-based anticancer agents with a mechanism of action different from that of the Ru(III) complex currently on clinical trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                03 May 2002
                20 May 2002
                : 86
                : 10
                : 1652-1657
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cancer Research UK, Edinburgh Oncology Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
                [2 ]Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: jeffrey.cummings@ 123456cancer.org.uk
                Article
                6600290
                10.1038/sj.bjc.6600290
                2746580
                12085218
                77a2bb6a-6e30-43dd-8a85-04d999a22b30
                Copyright 2002, Cancer Research UK
                History
                : 07 December 2001
                : 07 February 2002
                : 04 March 2002
                Categories
                Experimental Therapeutics

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                drug resistance,ruthenium(ii),ovarian xenografts,structure activity relationships,organometallic arene complexes

                Comments

                Comment on this article