18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences in Simulated Doctor and Patient Medical Decision Making: A Construal Level Perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients are often confronted with diverse medical decisions. Often lacking relevant medical knowledge, patients fail to independently make medical decisions and instead generally rely on the advice of doctors.

          Objective

          This study investigated the characteristics of and differences in doctor–patient medical decision making on the basis of construal level theory.

          Methods

          A total of 420 undergraduates majoring in clinical medicine were randomly assigned to six groups. Their decisions to opt for radiotherapy and surgery were investigated, with the choices described in a positive/neutral/negative frame × decision making for self/others.

          Results

          Compared with participants giving medical advice to patients, participants deciding for themselves were more likely to select radiotherapy (F 1, 404 = 13.92, p = 011). Participants from positive or neutral frames exhibited a higher tendency to choose surgery than did those from negative frames (F 2, 404 = 22.53, p<.001). The effect of framing on independent decision making was nonsignificant (F 2, 404 = 1.07, p = 35); however the effect of framing on the provision of advice to patients was significant (F 2, 404 = 12.95, p<.001). The effect of construal level was significant in the positive frame (F 1, 404 = 8.06, p = 005) and marginally significant in the neutral frame (F 2, 404 = 3.31, p = 07) but nonsignificant in the negative frame (F 2, 404 = .29, p = 59).

          Conclusion

          Both social distance and framing depiction significantly affected medical decision making and exhibited a significant interaction. Differences in medical decision making between doctors and patients need further investigation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

          When choosing between delayed or uncertain outcomes, individuals discount the value of such outcomes on the basis of the expected time to or the likelihood of their occurrence. In an integrative review of the expanding experimental literature on discounting, the authors show that although the same form of hyperbola-like function describes discounting of both delayed and probabilistic outcomes, a variety of recent findings are inconsistent with a single-process account. The authors also review studies that compare discounting in different populations and discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings. The present effort illustrates the value of studying choice involving both delayed and probabilistic outcomes within a general discounting framework that uses similar experimental procedures and a common analytical approach. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

            The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways. Reversals of preference are demonstrated in choices regarding monetary outcomes, both hypothetical and real, and in questions pertaining to the loss of human lives. The effects of frames on preferences are compared to the effects of perspectives on perceptual appearance. The dependence of preferences on the formulation of decision problems is a significant concern for the theory of rational choice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior.

              Construal level theory (CLT) is an account of how psychological distance influences individuals' thoughts and behavior. CLT assumes that people mentally construe objects that are psychologically near in terms of low-level, detailed, and contextualized features, whereas at a distance they construe the same objects or events in terms of high-level, abstract, and stable characteristics. Research has shown that different dimensions of psychological distance (time, space, social distance, and hypotheticality) affect mental construal and that these construals, in turn, guide prediction, evaluation, and behavior. The present paper reviews this research and its implications for consumer psychology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                14 November 2013
                : 8
                : 11
                : e79181
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
                [2 ]School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi’an, China
                University of Leicester, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JXP FH DMM WX. Performed the experiments: FH DMM YZ. Analyzed the data: JXP QHL YZ WX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JXP FH DMM WX. Wrote the paper: JXP DMM WX. Drew the pictures: JXP.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-17723
                10.1371/journal.pone.0079181
                3828343
                77a5691d-f3a2-4489-a130-00f90d218154
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 1 May 2013
                : 21 September 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                This study was supported by Social Science foundation of the People’s Republic of China (13XRK004). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article