17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers and Challenges to Treatment Alternatives for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in Lower-Resource Settings

      review-article
      , ,
      Journal of Global Oncology
      American Society of Clinical Oncology

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers among women worldwide, and approximately 85% of new diagnoses occur in less-developed regions of the world. Global efforts in cervical cancer to date have focused on primary and secondary prevention strategies of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening. Cervical cancer screening is effective to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer and can result in diagnosis at earlier stages, but it will take time to realize its full impact. With expansion of screening programs, there is now a greater imperative to increase access to treatment for women who have cervical cancer, particularly in earlier stages of disease, when it is still curable. Resources for multimodality treatment can be limited—or even absent—in many less-developed regions of the world and may be associated with geographic, social, and financial barriers for the patient. However, there is evidence that, in many cases, less-invasive and less–resource-intensive treatment options are still effective. To this end, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology have published guideline adaptations for specific resource constraints, and research about more conservative approaches to the treatment of cervical cancer continues. This review focuses on potential barriers and challenges to provision of safe and effective treatment of early-stage cervical cancer in lower-resource settings, and it suggests future directions for expansion of access to cervical cancer treatment around the world.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

          There were 732 evaluable patients with primary, previously untreated, histologically confirmed stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix with greater than or equal to 3-mm invasion. Of these, 645 had no gross disease beyond the cervix/uterus, had negative paraaortic lymph nodes, and had undergone a radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The 3-year disease-free interval (DFIs) for the 545 patients with negative pelvic nodes was 85.6%, and for the 100 with positive pelvic nodes, 74.4%. A large number of pelvic nodes involved with tumor was not correlated with a poorer prognosis; the DFIs were 72.1, 86.4, and 64.6% for one, two, and three or more positive pelvic nodes, respectively. DFI correlated strongly with depth of tumor invasion, both in absolute terms (mm) and infractional thirds. The DFI was 94.6% for less than or equal to 5 mm, 86.0% for 6-10 mm, 75.2% for 11-15 mm, 71.5% for 16-20 mm, and 59.5% greater than or equal to 21 mm. In fractional terms, the DFI was 94.1% for superficial third, 84.5% for middle third, and 73.6% for deep third invasion. With respect to clinical tumor size, the DFIs were 94.8, 88.1, and 67.6% for occult, less than or equal to 3 cm, and greater than 3 cm, respectively. The DFI was 77.0% for those with positive capillary-lymphatic spaces (CLS) and 88.9% for those with negative CLS. Tumor grade and parametrial status correlated with DFI. DFI was not significantly different for age, disease status of the surgical margins, tumor description (e.g., exophytic), quadrant involved with tumor, uterine extension, and keratinizing status of tumor cells. Clinical tumor size, CLS, and depth of tumor invasion were independent prognostic factors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic review of barriers to surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries.

            There is increasing evidence that lack of facilities, equipment, and expertise in district hospitals across many low- and middle-income countries constitutes a major barrier to accessing surgical care. However, what is less clear, is the extent to which people perceive barriers when trying to access surgical care. PubMed and EMBASE were searched using key words ("access" and "surgery," "barrier" and "surgery," "barrier" and "access"), MeSH headings ("health services availability," "developing countries," "rural population"), and the subject heading "health care access." Articles were included if they were qualitative and applied to illnesses where the treatment is primarily surgical. Key barriers included difficulty accessing surgical services due to distance, poor roads, and lack of suitable transport; lack of local resources and expertise; direct and indirect costs related to surgical care; and fear of undergoing surgery and anesthesia. The significance of cultural, financial, and structural barriers pertinent to surgery and their role in wider health care issues are discussed. Immediate action to improve financial and geographic accessibility along with investment in district hospitals is likely to make a significant impact on overcoming access and barrier issues. Further research is needed to identify issues that need to be addressed to close the gap between the care needed and that provided.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Global distribution of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Glob Oncol
                J Glob Oncol
                jgo
                jgo
                JGO
                Journal of Global Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                2378-9506
                October 2017
                11 May 2017
                : 3
                : 5
                : 572-582
                Affiliations
                [1] Emily S. Wu, University of Washington; Jose Jeronimo, PATH, Seattle, WA; and Sarah Feldman, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Emily S. Wu, MD, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356460, Seattle, WA 98195; e-mail: ewu10@ 123456uw.edu .
                Article
                007369
                10.1200/JGO.2016.007369
                5646895
                77ad885b-87e8-461c-abb4-6db0a7893cc4
                © 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 80, Pages: 11
                Categories
                GYNC1, Epidemiology
                GYNC2, Diagnosis & Staging
                GYNC6, Combined Modality
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article