21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of this study was to build a model of machine learning (ML) for the prediction of mortality in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

          Methods

          Hospitalized adult patients registered in the Trauma Registry System between January 2009 and December 2015 were enrolled in this study. Only patients with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥ 3 points related to head injuries were included in this study. A total of 1734 (1564 survival and 170 non-survival) and 325 (293 survival and 32 non-survival) patients were included in the training and test sets, respectively.

          Results

          Using demographics and injury characteristics, as well as patient laboratory data, predictive tools (e.g., logistic regression [LR], support vector machine [SVM], decision tree [DT], naive Bayes [NB], and artificial neural networks [ANN]) were used to determine the mortality of individual patients. The predictive performance was evaluated by accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, as well as by area under the curve (AUC) measures of receiver operator characteristic curves. In the training set, all five ML models had a specificity of more than 90% and all ML models (except the NB) achieved an accuracy of more than 90%. Among them, the ANN had the highest sensitivity (80.59%) in mortality prediction. Regarding performance, the ANN had the highest AUC (0.968), followed by the LR (0.942), SVM (0.935), NB (0.908), and DT (0.872). In the test set, the ANN had the highest sensitivity (84.38%) in mortality prediction, followed by the SVM (65.63%), LR (59.38%), NB (59.38%), and DT (43.75%).

          Conclusions

          The ANN model provided the best prediction of mortality for patients with isolated moderate and severe TBI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using Support Vector Machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review.

          Standard univariate analysis of neuroimaging data has revealed a host of neuroanatomical and functional differences between healthy individuals and patients suffering a wide range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Significant only at group level however these findings have had limited clinical translation, and recent attention has turned toward alternative forms of analysis, including Support-Vector-Machine (SVM). A type of machine learning, SVM allows categorisation of an individual's previously unseen data into a predefined group using a classification algorithm, developed on a training data set. In recent years, SVM has been successfully applied in the context of disease diagnosis, transition prediction and treatment prognosis, using both structural and functional neuroimaging data. Here we provide a brief overview of the method and review those studies that applied it to the investigation of Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, major depression, bipolar disorder, presymptomatic Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease and autistic spectrum disorder. We conclude by discussing the main theoretical and practical challenges associated with the implementation of this method into the clinic and possible future directions. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

            To develop and validate practical prognostic models for death at 14 days and for death or severe disability six months after traumatic brain injury. Multivariable logistic regression to select variables that were independently associated with two patient outcomes. Two models designed: "basic" model (demographic and clinical variables only) and "CT" model (basic model plus results of computed tomography). The models were subsequently developed for high and low-middle income countries separately. Medical Research Council (MRC) CRASH Trial. 10,008 patients with traumatic brain injury. Models externally validated in a cohort of 8509. The basic model included four predictors: age, Glasgow coma scale, pupil reactivity, and the presence of major extracranial injury. The CT model also included the presence of petechial haemorrhages, obliteration of the third ventricle or basal cisterns, subarachnoid bleeding, midline shift, and non-evacuated haematoma. In the derivation sample the models showed excellent discrimination (C statistic above 0.80). The models showed good calibration graphically. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test also indicated good calibration, except for the CT model in low-middle income countries. External validation for unfavourable outcome at six months in high income countries showed that basic and CT models had good discrimination (C statistic 0.77 for both models) but poorer calibration. Simple prognostic models can be used to obtain valid predictions of relevant outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression.

              Audience segmentation strategies are of increasing interest to public health professionals who wish to identify easily defined, mutually exclusive population subgroups whose members share similar characteristics that help determine participation in a health-related behavior as a basis for targeted interventions. Classification and regression tree (C&RT) analysis is a nonparametric decision tree methodology that has the ability to efficiently segment populations into meaningful subgroups. However, it is not commonly used in public health. This study provides a methodological overview of C&RT analysis for persons unfamiliar with the procedure. An example of a C&RT analysis is provided and interpretation of results is discussed. Results are validated with those obtained from a logistic regression model that was created to replicate the C&RT findings. Results obtained from the example C&RT analysis are also compared to those obtained from a common approach to logistic regression, the stepwise selection procedure. Issues to consider when deciding whether to use C&RT are discussed, and situations in which C&RT may and may not be beneficial are described. C&RT is a promising research tool for the identification of at-risk populations in public health research and outreach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Writing – original draft
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysis
                Role: Validation
                Role: Project administration
                Role: Conceptualization
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                9 November 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 11
                : e0207192
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan
                [2 ] Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan
                [3 ] Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan
                National Yang-Ming University, TAIWAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-2746
                Article
                PONE-D-18-10972
                10.1371/journal.pone.0207192
                6226171
                30412613
                77b2bed6-7f8b-4c32-9abb-54f2113d803a
                © 2018 Rau et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 April 2018
                : 28 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 12
                Funding
                This research was supported by a grant from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG8G0491. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Artificial Intelligence
                Artificial Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Computational Neuroscience
                Artificial Neural Networks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Computational Neuroscience
                Artificial Neural Networks
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Artificial Intelligence
                Machine Learning
                Support Vector Machines
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Traumatic Injury
                Neurotrauma
                Traumatic Brain Injury
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Compounds
                Organic Compounds
                Carbohydrates
                Monosaccharides
                Glucose
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Organic Chemistry
                Organic Compounds
                Carbohydrates
                Monosaccharides
                Glucose
                Engineering and Technology
                Management Engineering
                Decision Analysis
                Decision Trees
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Decision Analysis
                Decision Trees
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Forecasting
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Statistical Methods
                Forecasting
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Traumatic Injury
                Head Injury
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article