20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Slowdown of urology residents’ learning curve during the COVID‐19 emergency

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has rapidly been spreading worldwide, and Italy has been hit hard, forcing the Italian Healthcare System to change and adapt to these extreme conditions. The daily activities of the Urology Department have been drastically reduced and limited only to non‐deferrable procedures, and the entire organogram re‐organised following a rigorous flowchart [1]. It is evident that this unprecedent scenario will have an impact on resident training programmes, as it is very difficult to predict the duration of the COVID‐19 emergency. Urology residents do not have the opportunity to carry out clinical activities or to be tutored, as senior physicians are engaged in the emergency’s management. In particular, the Authorities have limited unnecessary access to urology departments for residents in order to contain the infection. Moreover, the procedures most affected by these restrictions are those in which the residents are mostly involved (benign pathologies, lower urinary tract surgery, and andrology); the surgical interventions, when performed, are carried out by expert surgeons, with the aim to standardise the procedures, reduce the operative time and the risk of complications. Very conflicting positions have emerged recently in Italy about the safety of laparoscopic and robot‐assisted surgical procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This is mainly related to the recently published claims on the potential risk of dissemination of the coronavirus infection through surgical gas [2]. Lastly, case discussions and departmental meetings have been cancelled, to avoid gathering. Attempts to systematically analyse and categorise the most affected activities during the 5‐year training programme (e.g. surgical training, research) are impossible, due to the absence of a homogeneous national training programme. Therefore, it is clear that urology resident training is affected transversally throughout the 5‐year residency, due to the involvement of ambulatory, outpatient surgery and major surgery (either open, minimally invasive surgery or endoscopic). A recently published survey gives a snapshot of residency training in Italy in 2018 [3], showing a high level of satisfaction amongst the residents, notwithstanding limitations concerning scientific activity and surgical training. In order to limit the impact of the COVID‐19 emergency on the residents’ learning curves, which can further affect surgical and scientific learning, new alternative teaching methods should be introduced (Table 1). Table 1 Summary of the different smart‐learning technologies and their respective fields of application. Smart‐learning technology Smart‐learning applications Pre‐recorded videos on‐demand Taught class Video library Fundamentals of surgery Surgical procedure’s commentary Expert’s ‘tips and tricks’ Webinar Interactive lessons Discussion of clinical cases Non‐technical skills Live debates Journal Club via social media Differed debates Critical analysis of the literature Resident’s editorials Shared working experiences Podcast Lectures Case reports Clinical staff and rounds Daily updates (single or multiple) ‘Virtual’ rounds Collegial discussions of surgical approach Administration’s directives Simulation Home simulators (experimental) John Wiley & Sons, Ltd This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency. So, thanks to new web‐based technologies, teaching activity can continue. Among the different technologies available, different types of smart‐learning can be implemented. The first one is represented by an online dedicated platform, where pre‐recorded videos of lessons or surgical procedures are uploaded; these files could be available on‐demand for the residents. In this setting, users greatly appreciate the ability to watch pre‐recorded surgical procedures commented upon by an expert, with focus on routinely performed urological manoeuvres or new techniques and technologies in urology or, furthermore, expert ‘tips and tricks’ for challenging cases. The Surgery in Motion School of the European Urology Association (https://surgeryinmotion-school.org) represents a well‐established video‐based educational tool for efficient mentorship in surgical training. The next facet of online teaching is represented by the webinar format. It has already been shown to be useful in this setting [4], giving to both professors and students the chance to interact and to enjoy multimedia content in real‐time. Classes, clinical cases discussion and interactive pre‐recorded video presentations can be held by an expert, and the residents have the ability to ask questions. Moreover, various non‐technical skills can be covered. Furthermore, exploiting web microblogging services, like Twitter online Journal Clubs can be done. By using social media, residents can engage in critical appraisal of evidence‐based medicine with dynamic worldwide shared discussion amongst themselves, having the chance to interact with opinion leaders in specific topics. This format has already proven to change clinical practice in 50% of young attendees [5]. Lastly, pre‐recorded audio files of expert opinion can be shared online, creating dedicated Podcast channels. This modality of e‐learning is not novel and every week >500 000 podcasts are active worldwide. Today, for urology there are a total of two podcasts experiences and only one of which was active (i.e. https://www.bjuinternational.com/podcasts). From this examination, it appears clear how the theoretical training of residents can continue with smart‐learning modalities. However, in reality the implementation of such clinical smart‐learning appears to be more challenging. The daily clinical staff meeting can be web‐based and planned by using dedicated webinar slots, opening an interactive discussion amongst the urologists and residents concerning the recovery of patients; a second daily update can be done in the afternoon. The procedures of the day can be discussed jointly: in this emergency period it is important to choose the best surgical approach and surgeon for the selected patient, in order to maximise the efficacy of the procedure and reduce the risk of adverse events. Moreover, planning strategies concerning the management of COVID‐19 and non‐COVID‐19 patients should be planned according to the hospital administration decrees. Furthermore, thanks to the advent of new telepresence robotic platforms like the Intouch Vita by Intouch Health, Goleta, CA, USA (https://intouchhealth.com/?gdprorigin=true), the morning rounds can be potentially shared with online attendees. Thanks to advanced features including auto‐drive capabilities, remote providers can control or automatically head to a patient care location, having the possibility to live‐broadcast images and audio to physicians in their homes. Finally, notwithstanding the well‐established usefulness of surgical simulation training programmes [6], in this particular historic moment, where the Authorities have limited unnecessary transfers, the access to simulation platforms usually located in hospitals or universities is difficult. Preliminary experiences with home‐made simulators have already been presented, but their real clinical utility is still under investigation. In conclusion, we think that the use of smart technology should be maximised and implemented, in order to guarantee continuity in the learning curve of residents. Now, during this extraordinary emergency in which it is very difficult to predict the duration of disruption, the current necessity should hopefully be translated into a future opportunity, in which smart‐learning can become a useful tool integrated routinely into residency training programmes and urology daily life. Conflict of interest None disclosed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

          The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and the disease it causes, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is generating a rapid and tragic health emergency in Italy due to the need to provide assistance to an overwhelming number of infected patients and, at the same time, treat all the non-deferrable oncological and benign conditions. A panel of Italian urologists has agreed on possible strategies for the reorganization of urological routine practice and on a set of recommendations that should facilitate the process of rescheduling both surgical and outpatient activities during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the subsequent phases. This document could be a valid tool to be used in routine clinical practice and, possibly, a cornerstone for further discussion on the topic also considering the further evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also may provide useful recommendations for national and international urological societies in a condition of emergency.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating the usefulness and utility of a webinar as a platform to educate students on a UK clinical academic programme.

            The Academic Foundation Programme (AFP) is the first step of the UK's national integrated clinical academic pathway; however, the application process can be unclear. We evaluated webinars as a teaching medium to enhance knowledge and confidence of prospective applicants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Journal Club: Experience from the International Urology Journal Club

              The International Urology Journal Club attracts global participation; however, its effectiveness as an educational resource is undetermined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                porpiglia@libero.it
                Journal
                BJU Int
                BJU Int
                10.1111/(ISSN)1464-410X
                BJU
                Bju International
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1464-4096
                1464-410X
                28 April 2020
                June 2020
                : 125
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/bju.v125.6 )
                : E15-E17
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Urology Department of Oncology ”San Luigi Gonzaga” Hospital University of Turin Orbassano (Turin) Italy
                [ 2 ] Uro‐technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Arnhem The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU) Arnhem the Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy
                [ 5 ] Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence Florence Italy
                [ 6 ] Urological Clinic Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences University of Trieste Trieste Italy
                [ 7 ] Department of Urology University of Rome Rome Italy
                [ 8 ] Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation University of Foggia Foggia Italy
                [ 9 ] Department of Human and Pediatric Pathology “Gaetano Barresi”, Urology Section University of Messina Messina Italy
                [ 10 ] King's College London Guy's Hospital London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Francesco Porpiglia, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano (Turin), Italy.

                e‐mail: porpiglia@ 123456libero.it

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-6795
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-0888
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2812-5553
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0108-1864
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-5196
                Article
                BJU15076
                10.1111/bju.15076
                7262049
                32274879
                77bb8b24-dcaa-4e36-9c93-fc561397ca0e
                © 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 3, Words: 1509
                Categories
                Comment
                Covid‐19 in Urology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.3 mode:remove_FC converted:01.06.2020

                Urology
                Urology

                Comments

                Comment on this article