24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Climate change, climatic variation and extreme biological responses

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Extreme climatic events could be major drivers of biodiversity change, but it is unclear whether extreme biological changes are (i) individualistic (species- or group-specific), (ii) commonly associated with unusual climatic events and/or (iii) important determinants of long-term population trends. Using population time series for 238 widespread species (207 Lepidoptera and 31 birds) in England since 1968, we found that population ‘crashes’ (outliers in terms of species' year-to-year population changes) were 46% more frequent than population ‘explosions’. (i) Every year, at least three species experienced extreme changes in population size, and in 41 of the 44 years considered, some species experienced population crashes while others simultaneously experienced population explosions. This suggests that, even within the same broad taxonomic groups, species are exhibiting individualistic dynamics, most probably driven by their responses to different, short-term events associated with climatic variability. (ii) Six out of 44 years showed a significant excess of species experiencing extreme population changes (5 years for Lepidoptera, 1 for birds). These ‘consensus years’ were associated with climatically extreme years, consistent with a link between extreme population responses and climatic variability, although not all climatically extreme years generated excess numbers of extreme population responses. (iii) Links between extreme population changes and long-term population trends were absent in Lepidoptera and modest (but significant) in birds. We conclude that extreme biological responses are individualistic, in the sense that the extreme population changes of most species are taking place in different years, and that long-term trends of widespread species have not, to date, been dominated by these extreme changes.

          This article is part of the themed issue ‘Behavioural, ecological and evolutionary responses to extreme climatic events’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change.

            Habitat degradation and climate change are thought to be altering the distributions and abundances of animals and plants throughout the world, but their combined impacts have not been assessed for any species assemblage. Here we evaluated changes in the distribution sizes and abundances of 46 species of butterflies that approach their northern climatic range margins in Britain-where changes in climate and habitat are opposing forces. These insects might be expected to have responded positively to climate warming over the past 30 years, yet three-quarters of them declined: negative responses to habitat loss have outweighed positive responses to climate warming. Half of the species that were mobile and habitat generalists increased their distribution sites over this period (consistent with a climate explanation), whereas the other generalists and 89% of the habitat specialists declined in distribution size (consistent with habitat limitation). Changes in population abundances closely matched changes in distributions. The dual forces of habitat modification and climate change are likely to cause specialists to decline, leaving biological communities with reduced numbers of species and dominated by mobile and widespread habitat generalists.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Declining coral calcification on the Great Barrier Reef.

              Reef-building corals are under increasing physiological stress from a changing climate and ocean absorption of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. We investigated 328 colonies of massive Porites corals from 69 reefs of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in Australia. Their skeletal records show that throughout the GBR, calcification has declined by 14.2% since 1990, predominantly because extension (linear growth) has declined by 13.3%. The data suggest that such a severe and sudden decline in calcification is unprecedented in at least the past 400 years. Calcification increases linearly with increasing large-scale sea surface temperature but responds nonlinearly to annual temperature anomalies. The causes of the decline remain unknown; however, this study suggests that increasing temperature stress and a declining saturation state of seawater aragonite may be diminishing the ability of GBR corals to deposit calcium carbonate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                19 June 2017
                8 May 2017
                8 May 2017
                : 372
                : 1723 , Theme issue ‘Behavioural, ecological and evolutionary responses to extreme climatic events’ compiled and edited by Martijn van de Pol, Stéphanie Jenouvrier and Marcel E. Visser
                : 20160144
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, University of York , Wentworth Way, York YO10 5DD, UK
                [2 ]Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth , Wareham BH20 5QP, UK
                [3 ]AgroEcology Department, Rothamsted Research , Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK
                [4 ]Centre for Ecology and Conservation, and Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter , Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK
                [5 ]British Trust for Ornithology , The Nunnery, Thetford IP24 2PU, UK
                [6 ]Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
                [7 ]Centre for Ecology and Hydrology , Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6185-7583
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0153-0121
                Article
                rstb20160144
                10.1098/rstb.2016.0144
                5434095
                28483874
                77d7e85b-62bc-4665-b2f7-bd67ca4c1042
                © 2017 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 December 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270;
                Award ID: NE/K00381X/1
                Award ID: NE/M013030/1
                Categories
                1001
                60
                Section III: Ecological Responses to Extreme Climatic Events
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                June 19, 2017

                Philosophy of science
                aves,butterfly,climatic risk,lepidoptera,moth,weather
                Philosophy of science
                aves, butterfly, climatic risk, lepidoptera, moth, weather

                Comments

                Comment on this article