7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background. Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was shown to be superior to enalapril in reducing the risk of death and hospitalization for HF. Our aim was to evaluate the cardiopulmonary effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF. Methods. We conducted an observational study. Ninety-nine ambulatory patients with HFrEF underwent serial cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in addition to recommended therapy. Results. At baseline, 37% of patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III. After a median follow-up of 6.2 months (range 3–14.9 months) systolic blood pressure decreased from 117 ± 14 to 101 ± 12 mmHg ( p < 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 27 ± 6 to 29.7 ± 7% ( p < 0.0001), peak oxygen consumption (VO 2) improved from 14.6 ± 3.3 (% of predicted = 53.8 ± 14.1) to 17.2 ± 4.7 mL/kg/min (% of predicted = 64.7 ± 17.8) ( p < 0.0001), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO 2 Slope) decreased from 34.1 ± 6.3 to 31.7 ± 6.1 ( p = 0.006), VO 2 at anaerobic threshold increased from 11.3 ± 2.6 to 12.6 ± 3.5 mL/kg/min ( p = 0.007), oxygen pulse increased from 11.5 ± 3.0 to 13.4 ± 4.3 mL/kg/min ( p < 0.0001), and ∆VO 2/∆Work increased from 9.2 ± 1.5 to 10.1 ± 1.8 mL/min/watt ( p = 0.0002). Conclusion. Sacubitril/valsartan improved exercise tolerance, LVEF, peak VO 2, and ventilatory efficiency at 6.2 months follow-up. Further studies are necessary to better clarify underlying mechanisms of this functional improvement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Value of peak exercise oxygen consumption for optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

            Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction is often difficult. To determine whether measurement of peak oxygen consumption (VO2) during maximal exercise testing can be used to identify patients in whom transplantation can be safely deferred, we prospectively performed exercise testing on all ambulatory patients referred for transplant between October 1986 and December 1989. Patients were assigned into one of three groups on the basis of exercise data: Group 1 (n = 35) comprised patients accepted for transplant (VO2 less than or equal to 14 ml/kg/min); group 2 (n = 52) comprised patients considered too well for transplant (VO2 greater than 14 ml/kg/min); and group 3 (n = 27) comprised patients with low VO2 rejected for transplant due to noncardiac problems. All three groups were comparable in New York Heart Association functional class, ejection fraction, and cardiac index (p = NS). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was significantly lower in group 2 than in either group 1 or 3 (p less than 0.05), although there was wide overlap. Patients with preserved exercise capacity (group 2) had cumulative 1- and 2-year survival rates of 94% and 84%, which are equal to survival levels after transplantation. In contrast, patients rejected for transplant (group 3) had survival rates of only 47% at 1 year and 32% at 2 years, whereas patients awaiting transplantation (group 1) had a survival rate of 70% at 1 year (both p less than 0.005 versus patients with VO2 greater than 14 ml/kg/min). All deaths in group 2 were sudden. By univariate and multivariate analyses, peak VO2 was the best predictor of survival, with only pulmonary capillary wedge pressure providing additional prognostic information. These data suggest that cardiac transplantation can be safely deferred in ambulatory patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and peak exercise VO2 of more than 14 ml/min/kg.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              2016 Focused Update: Clinical Recommendations for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Data Assessment in Specific Patient Populations.

              In the past several decades, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) has seen an exponential increase in its evidence base. The growing volume of evidence in support of CPX has precipitated the release of numerous scientific statements by societies and associations. In 2012, the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation and the American Heart Association developed a joint document with the primary intent of redefining CPX analysis and reporting in a way that would streamline test interpretation and increase clinical application. Specifically, the 2012 joint scientific statement on CPX conceptualized an easy-to-use, clinically meaningful analysis based on evidence-vetted variables in color-coded algorithms; single-page algorithms were successfully developed for each proposed test indication. Because of an abundance of new CPX research in recent years and a reassessment of the current algorithms in light of the body of evidence, a focused update to the 2012 scientific statement is now warranted. The purposes of this update are to confirm algorithms included in the initial scientific statement not requiring revision, to propose revisions to algorithms included in the initial scientific statement, to propose new algorithms based on emerging scientific evidence, to further clarify the application of oxygen consumption at ventilatory threshold, to describe CPX variables with an emerging scientific evidence base, to describe the synergistic value of combining CPX with other assessments, to discuss personnel considerations for CPX laboratories, and to provide recommendations for future CPX research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                20 February 2019
                February 2019
                : 8
                : 2
                : 262
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Buccheri La Ferla Fatebenefratelli Hospital, 90123 Palermo, Italy; giuseppevit@ 123456hotmail.com (G.V.); caccamo.giuseppa@ 123456libero.it (G.C.); cinzianugara@ 123456gmail.com (C.N.)
                [2 ]Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation IRCCS – ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy; gromano@ 123456ismett.edu (G.R.); lajello1305@ 123456libero.it (L.A.); vagnese@ 123456ismett.edu (V.A.); fclemenza@ 123456ismett.edu (F.C.)
                [3 ]Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; and2052@ 123456med.cornell.edu
                [4 ]Biomedical Department of Internal Medicine and Specialities (DIBIMIS), University of Palermo – IRCSS Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy
                [5 ]Cardiology Unit, University Hospital, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, 90127 Palermo, Italy; salvo.storniolo@ 123456gmail.com (S.S.); silvia.sarullo@ 123456libero.it (S.S.); giuseppina.novo@ 123456unipa.it (G.N.)
                [6 ]Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Metabolic and Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, Federico II University, 80138 Naples, Italy; francesco.giallauria@ 123456unina.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: fsarullo@ 123456neomedia.it ; Tel.: +39-091-479263
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9415-2360
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-0926
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-568X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-8316
                Article
                jcm-08-00262
                10.3390/jcm8020262
                6406731
                30791533
                77fd7015-0319-4482-8800-1f8aff30c767
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 January 2019
                : 18 February 2019
                Categories
                Article

                heart failure,sacubitril/valsartan,cardiopulmonary test,exercise tolerance

                Comments

                Comment on this article