3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Questioning the Value of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Children with Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) is a relatively common disorder. Current diagnostic protocol requires a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the hypothalamus and the hypophysis to determine the cause after establishment of the diagnosis. This study aimed to examine the yield of brain MRI in the evaluation of children with IGHD and to define clinical and laboratory parameters that justify its performance. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all children (<18 years) diagnosed with IGHD was conducted at 3 pediatric endocrinology units between 2008 and 2018. Results: The study included 192 children (107 boys) with confirmed IGHD. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) at diagnosis was 8.2 ± 3.7 years (median 8.5 years, range 0.8–15.9). The mean height SD score (SDS) at diagnosis was –2.25 ± 0.73. The mean height deficit SDS (defined as the difference between height SDS at diagnosis and mid-parental height SDS) was –1.7 ± 0.9. Fifteen children (7.8%) had pathological MRI findings. No space-occupying lesion was detected. Children with pathological MRIs had greater height deficit SDS and lower peak growth hormone levels on provocative tests compared to children with normal MRIs: –2.3 ± 1.2 vs. –1.6 ± 0.8 ( p = 0.02) and 4.4 ± 1.9 vs. 5.7 ± 1.3 ( p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: Our preliminary data indicate that most brain MRIs performed for routine evaluation of children with IGHD are not essential for determining cause. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed in order to validate this proposed revision of current protocols.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.

          This report provides detailed information on how the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts for the United States were developed, expanding upon the report that accompanied the initial release of the charts in 2000. The growth charts were developed with data from five national health examination surveys and limited supplemental data. Smoothed percentile curves were developed in two stages. In the first stage, selected empirical percentiles were smoothed with a variety of parametric and nonparametric procedures. In the second stage, parameters were created to obtain the final curves, additional percentiles and z-scores. The revised charts were evaluated using statistical and graphical measures. The 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth charts were revised for infants (birth to 36 months) and older children (2 to 20 years). New body mass index-for-age (BMI-for-age) charts were created. Use of national data improved the transition from the infant charts to those for older children. The evaluation of the charts found no large or systematic differences between the smoothed percentiles and the empirical data. The 2000 CDC growth charts were developed with improved data and statistical procedures. Health care providers now have an instrument for growth screening that better represents the racial-ethnic diversity and combination of breast- and formula-feeding in the United States. It is recommended that these charts replace the 1977 NCHS charts when assessing the size and growth patterns of infants, children, and adolescents.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary statement of the GH Research Society. GH Research Society.

              (2000)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Guidelines for Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Treatment in Children and Adolescents: Growth Hormone Deficiency, Idiopathic Short Stature, and Primary Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Deficiency

              Background/Aims: On behalf of the Drug and Therapeutics, and Ethics Committees of the Pediatric Endocrine Society, we sought to update the guidelines published in 2003 on the use of growth hormone (GH). Because idiopathic short stature (ISS) remains a controversial indication, and diagnostic challenges often blur the distinction between ISS, GH deficiency (GHD), and primary IGF-I deficiency (PIGFD), we focused on these three diagnoses, thereby adding recombinant IGF-I therapy to the GH guidelines for the first time. Methods: This guideline was developed following the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results: This guideline provides recommendations for the clinical management of children and adolescents with growth failure from GHD, ISS, or PIGFD using the best available evidence. Conclusion: The taskforce suggests that the recommendations be applied in clinical practice with consideration of the evolving literature and the risks and benefits to each individual patient. In many instances, careful review highlights areas that need further research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRP
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2020
                October 2020
                24 August 2020
                : 93
                : 4
                : 245-250
                Affiliations
                aPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Dana-Dwek Children’s Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
                bSackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
                cPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
                dPediatric Radiology Unit, Dana-Dwek Children’s Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
                ePediatric Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Edmond and Lily Safra Children’s Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
                Author notes
                *Asaf Oren, Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Dana-Dwek Children’s Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., IL–6423906 Tel Aviv (Israel), orenasaf@hotmail.com
                Article
                509366 Horm Res Paediatr 2020;93:245–250
                10.1159/000509366
                32836222
                © 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Tables: 2, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article