19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      SAGIT ®: clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice—development and results from a pilot study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The SAGIT instrument is a comprehensive clinician-reported outcome instrument assessing key features of acromegaly: signs and symptoms, associated comorbidities; growth hormone levels; insulin-like growth factor-1 levels; and tumor profile. The SAGIT instrument has been designed to assist endocrinologists managing acromegaly in practice. Here, we report on pre-testing (to assess ease of understanding and acceptability) and a pilot study (to assess relevance, ease of use, and utility in real-life conditions) (NCT02231593).

          Methods

          For pre-testing, 11 endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument using patient medical records and were also interviewed. They subsequently completed a PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test ©) to report their experiences using SAGIT, and feedback was used to revise the instrument. In the pilot study, nine endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument in real-time with patients belonging to three different categories (stable/controlled, active/uncontrolled acromegaly, treatment-naïve), while four completed the instrument based on medical-record review. All participants then completed the PRAC-Test © and their feedback was used to update the instrument.

          Results

          The SAGIT instrument was well accepted by endocrinologists, with most indicating that it was concise, practical, easy to understand, useful for assessing treatment response, and valuable as a component of the patient’s medical record. The pilot study confirmed the instrument’s acceptability, utility, and ease of use, and indicated its potential for distinguishing acromegaly clinical stages.

          Conclusions

          The SAGIT instrument is promising as a tool for use by endocrinologists in everyday practice to assess the status and evolution of disease in patients with acromegaly and to guide treatment decision-making.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.

          The aim was to formulate clinical practice guidelines for acromegaly.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Medical progress: Acromegaly.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly.

              The Acromegaly Consensus Group met in April 2009 to revisit the guidelines on criteria for cure as defined in 2000. Participants included 74 neurosurgeons and endocrinologists with extensive experience of treating acromegaly. EVIDENCE/CONSENSUS PROCESS: Relevant assays, biochemical measures, clinical outcomes, and definition of disease control were discussed, based on the available published evidence, and the strength of consensus statements was rated. Criteria to define active acromegaly and disease control were agreed, and several significant changes were made to the 2000 guidelines. Appropriate methods of measuring and achieving disease control were summarized.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +39 0303 996520 , a.giustina@libero.it
                Journal
                Pituitary
                Pituitary
                Pituitary
                Springer US (New York )
                1386-341X
                1573-7403
                16 September 2015
                16 September 2015
                2016
                : 19
                : 39-49
                Affiliations
                [ ]Chair of Endocrinology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
                [ ]Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
                [ ]Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                [ ]Department of Medicine, Santiago de Compostela University - CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [ ]Hôpital Bicêtre, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
                [ ]ENDOC Centre for Endocrine Tumours, Hamburg, Germany
                [ ]Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex, France
                [ ]Mapi, Lyon, France
                [ ]Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA USA
                Article
                681
                10.1007/s11102-015-0681-2
                4710645
                26377024
                783140af-58a6-4e6a-ad59-947e908cafbe
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001254, Ipsen Fund (GB);
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

                Medicine
                acromegaly,clinician-reported outcomes,instrument,pilot study
                Medicine
                acromegaly, clinician-reported outcomes, instrument, pilot study

                Comments

                Comment on this article