2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decreased modular segregation of the frontal–parietal network in major depressive disorder

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition associated with aberrant large-scale distributed brain networks. However, it is unclear how the network dysfunction in MDD patients is characterized by imbalance or derangement of network modular segregation. Fifty-one MDD patients and forty-three matched healthy controls (HC) were recruited in the present study. We analyzed intrinsic brain activity derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) and then examined brain network segregation by computing the participation coefficient (PC). Further intra- and inter-modular connections analysis were preformed to explain atypical PC. Besides, we explored the potential relationship between the above graph theory measures and symptom severity in MDD. Lower modular segregation of the frontal–parietal network (FPN) was found in MDD compared with the HC group. The MDD group exhibited increased inter-module connections between the FPN and cingulo-opercular network (CON), between the FPN and cerebellum (Cere), between the CON and Cere. At the nodal level, the PC of the anterior prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and intraparietal sulcus showed larger in MDD. Additionally, the inter-module connections between the FPN and CON and the PC values of the IPL were negatively correlated with depression symptom in the MDD group. These findings might give evidence about abnormal FPN in MDD from the perspective of modular segregation in brain networks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations.

          Brain connectivity datasets comprise networks of brain regions connected by anatomical tracts or by functional associations. Complex network analysis-a new multidisciplinary approach to the study of complex systems-aims to characterize these brain networks with a small number of neurobiologically meaningful and easily computable measures. In this article, we discuss construction of brain networks from connectivity data and describe the most commonly used network measures of structural and functional connectivity. We describe measures that variously detect functional integration and segregation, quantify centrality of individual brain regions or pathways, characterize patterns of local anatomical circuitry, and test resilience of networks to insult. We discuss the issues surrounding comparison of structural and functional network connectivity, as well as comparison of networks across subjects. Finally, we describe a Matlab toolbox (http://www.brain-connectivity-toolbox.net) accompanying this article and containing a collection of complex network measures and large-scale neuroanatomical connectivity datasets. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

            Non-fatal health outcomes from diseases and injuries are a crucial consideration in the promotion and monitoring of individual and population health. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) studies done in 1990 and 2000 have been the only studies to quantify non-fatal health outcomes across an exhaustive set of disorders at the global and regional level. Neither effort quantified uncertainty in prevalence or years lived with disability (YLDs). Of the 291 diseases and injuries in the GBD cause list, 289 cause disability. For 1160 sequelae of the 289 diseases and injuries, we undertook a systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, remission, duration, and excess mortality. Sources included published studies, case notification, population-based cancer registries, other disease registries, antenatal clinic serosurveillance, hospital discharge data, ambulatory care data, household surveys, other surveys, and cohort studies. For most sequelae, we used a Bayesian meta-regression method, DisMod-MR, designed to address key limitations in descriptive epidemiological data, including missing data, inconsistency, and large methodological variation between data sources. For some disorders, we used natural history models, geospatial models, back-calculation models (models calculating incidence from population mortality rates and case fatality), or registration completeness models (models adjusting for incomplete registration with health-system access and other covariates). Disability weights for 220 unique health states were used to capture the severity of health loss. YLDs by cause at age, sex, country, and year levels were adjusted for comorbidity with simulation methods. We included uncertainty estimates at all stages of the analysis. Global prevalence for all ages combined in 2010 across the 1160 sequelae ranged from fewer than one case per 1 million people to 350,000 cases per 1 million people. Prevalence and severity of health loss were weakly correlated (correlation coefficient -0·37). In 2010, there were 777 million YLDs from all causes, up from 583 million in 1990. The main contributors to global YLDs were mental and behavioural disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and diabetes or endocrine diseases. The leading specific causes of YLDs were much the same in 2010 as they were in 1990: low back pain, major depressive disorder, iron-deficiency anaemia, neck pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorders, migraine, diabetes, and falls. Age-specific prevalence of YLDs increased with age in all regions and has decreased slightly from 1990 to 2010. Regional patterns of the leading causes of YLDs were more similar compared with years of life lost due to premature mortality. Neglected tropical diseases, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and anaemia were important causes of YLDs in sub-Saharan Africa. Rates of YLDs per 100,000 people have remained largely constant over time but rise steadily with age. Population growth and ageing have increased YLD numbers and crude rates over the past two decades. Prevalences of the most common causes of YLDs, such as mental and behavioural disorders and musculoskeletal disorders, have not decreased. Health systems will need to address the needs of the rising numbers of individuals with a range of disorders that largely cause disability but not mortality. Quantification of the burden of non-fatal health outcomes will be crucial to understand how well health systems are responding to these challenges. Effective and affordable strategies to deal with this rising burden are an urgent priority for health systems in most parts of the world. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modularity and community structure in networks

              M. Newman (2006)
              Many networks of interest in the sciences, including social networks, computer networks, and metabolic and regulatory networks, are found to divide naturally into communities or modules. The problem of detecting and characterizing this community structure is one of the outstanding issues in the study of networked systems. One highly effective approach is the optimization of the quality function known as "modularity" over the possible divisions of a network. Here I show that the modularity can be expressed in terms of the eigenvectors of a characteristic matrix for the network, which I call the modularity matrix, and that this expression leads to a spectral algorithm for community detection that returns results of demonstrably higher quality than competing methods in shorter running times. I illustrate the method with applications to several published network data sets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                22 July 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 929812
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University , Hangzhou, China
                [2] 2Institute of Psychological Science, Hangzhou Normal University , Hangzhou, China
                [3] 3Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments , Hangzhou, China
                [4] 4Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University , Hangzhou, China
                [5] 5Affiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alessandra Anzolin, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

                Reviewed by: Afra Wohlschlaeger, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Kuanjun He, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, China

                *Correspondence: Donglin Wang, wangdl@ 123456hznu.edu.cn

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Mood Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2022.929812
                9353222
                784215b3-845e-46a1-9e99-178a5e5b78a1
                Copyright © 2022 Lan, Zhang, Wang, Tan, Wang, Pan, Xiao, Kuai and Xue.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 April 2022
                : 04 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 60, Pages: 10, Words: 6094
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, doi 10.13039/501100004731;
                Award ID: LQ19G030003
                Award ID: LY17H180007
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 81271503
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                frontal–parietal network,major depressive disorder,modular segregation,participation coefficient,fmri

                Comments

                Comment on this article