122
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term loss in extent and current protection of terrestrial ecosystem diversity in the temperate and tropical Americas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Documenting changes in ecosystem extent and protection is essential to understanding status of biodiversity and related ecosystem services and have direct applications to measuring Essential Biodiversity Variables, Targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. We developed both potential and current distribution maps of terrestrial ecosystem types for the temperate and tropical Americas; with “potential” estimating where a type would likely occur today had there not been prior land conversion for modern land uses. We utilized a hierarchical classification to describe and map natural ecosystem types at six levels of thematic detail, with lower thematic levels defining more units each with narrower floristic range than upper levels. Current land use/land cover was derived using available global data on human land use intensity and combined with the potential distribution maps to estimate long-term change in extent for each ecosystem type. We also assessed representation of ecosystem types within protected areas as defined by IUCN I-VI land status categories. Of the 749 ecosystem types assessed, represented at 5 th (n = 315) vs. 6 th (n = 433) levels of the classification hierarchy, 5 types (1.6%) and 31 types (7.1%), respectively, have lost >90% of their potential extent. Some 66 types (20.9%) and 141 types (32.5%), respectively, have lost >50% of their potential extent; thus, crossing thresholds of Vulnerable status under IUCN Red List criterion A3. For ecosystem type representation within IUCN protected area classes, with reference to potential extent of each type, 111 (45.3%) and 125 (28.8%) of types, respectively, have higher representation (>17%) than CBD 2020 targets. Twelve types (3.8%) and 23 (5.3%) of types, respectively, are represented with <1% within protected areas. We illustrate an option for visualizing and reporting on CBD targets (2020 and proposed post-2020) for ecosystem representativeness using both potential extent as a baseline.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: Software
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                30 June 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 6
                : e0234960
                Affiliations
                [1 ] NatureServe, Boulder, CO, United States of America
                [2 ] EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador
                [3 ] NatureServe, Arlington, VA, United States of America
                Indiana State University, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5869-2105
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-6671
                Article
                PONE-D-19-06449
                10.1371/journal.pone.0234960
                7326196
                32603348
                78854660-c68f-42ce-8372-0f1333da9e75
                © 2020 Comer et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 March 2019
                : 5 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 1, Pages: 23
                Funding
                All authors were supported in this effort in part by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) https://www.iucn.org/ (contract #P00497) with funds originating with the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation https://www.moore.org/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Plant Ecology
                Plant Communities
                Grasslands
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Plant Ecology
                Plant Communities
                Grasslands
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Ecology
                Plant Communities
                Grasslands
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Grasslands
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Temperate Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Temperate Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Forests
                Temperate Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Temperate Forests
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Land Use
                Social Sciences
                Human Geography
                Land Use
                Custom metadata
                Map products from this analysis are accessible for public viewing and download from DataBasin: https://databasin.org/datasets/db6bef1fcd3a46c881ee8322aa14854f Additional explanation and access to the Databasin site through the NatureServe website (Natureserve.org)

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article