Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce

There is a lack of consistency among researchers and clinicians in the use of terminology that describes changes in motor ability following neurological injury. Specifically, the terms and definitions of motor compensation and motor recovery have been used in different ways, which is a potential barrier to interdisciplinary communication. This Point of View describes the problem and offers a solution in the form of definitions of compensation and recovery at the neuronal, motor performance, and functional levels within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning model.

Time course and degree of recovery of upper extremity (UE) function after stroke and the influence of initial UE paresis were studied prospectively in a community-based population of 421 consecutive stroke patients admitted acutely during a 1-year period. UE function was assessed weekly, using the Barthel Index subscores for feeding and grooming. UE paresis was assessed by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale subscores for hand and arm. The best possible UE function was achieved by 80% of the patients within 3 weeks after stroke onset and by 95% within 9 weeks; in patients with mild UE paresis, function was achieved within 3 and 6 weeks, respectively, and in patients with severe UE paresis within 6 and 11 weeks, respectively. Full UE function was achieved by 79% of patients with mild UE paresis and only by 18% of patients with severe UE paresis. A valid prognosis of UE function can be made within 3 and 6 weeks in patients with mild and severe UE paresis, respectively. Further recovery of UE function should not be expected after 6 and 11 weeks respectively, in these groups of patients.

Knowledge of the frequency and remission of aphasia is essential for the rehabilitation of stroke patients and provides insight into the brain organization of language. We studied prospectively and consecutively an unselected and community-based sample of 881 patients with acute stroke. Assessment of aphasia was done at admission, weekly during the hospital stay, and at a 6-month follow-up using the aphasia score of the Scandinavian Stroke Scale. Thirty-eight percent had aphasia at the time of admission; at discharge 18% had aphasia. Sex was not a determinant of aphasia in stroke, and no sex difference in the anterior-posterior distribution of lesions was found. The remission curve was steep: Stationary language function in 95% was reached within 2 weeks in those with initial mild aphasia, within 6 weeks in those with moderate, and within 10 weeks in those with severe aphasia. A valid prognosis of aphasia could be made within 1 to 4 weeks after the stroke depending on the initial severity of aphasia. Initial severity of aphasia was the only clinically relevant predictor of aphasia outcome. Sex, handedness, and side of stroke lesion were not independent outcome predictors, and the influence of age was minimal.