There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
There has been a recent surge of interest in the evolutionary basis of depression.
One approach argues that the affective mechanisms that are dysregulated in depression
are adaptations, whilst a second approach argues that depression itself is an adaptation.
The evidence relating to whether depression could itself be an adaptation is reviewed.
Adaptations generally have four hallmarks; they lack heritable variation, show evidence
of good design, are evoked by appropriate triggers, and fitness is reduced where they
are absent. Depression shows none of these hallmarks. It is characterized by heritability,
recurrence, cognitive impairment, and poor social outcome. In an alternative evolutionary
formulation, I argue that evolution has produced a continuous population distribution
of affective reactivity that is subject to stabilizing selection. Individuals vulnerable
to depression are at the upper end of this distribution. This conceptualization, in
which depression itself is not selected for, is compatible with the known clinical
and epidemiological facts.