12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of Changing Health for the management of prediabetes: protocol for a pilot study of a digital behavioural intervention

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The prevalence of prediabetes is rapidly rising in the UK, largely associated with an increase in obesity. Lifestyle programmes that provide support to make and sustain dietary and physical activity behavioural changes are necessary to initiate and maintain weight loss. However, these programmes are often intensive and time consuming. Given the magnitude of the problem, there is a need for behavioural interventions that can be delivered at scale. Digital interventions can address some of the aforementioned issues. The primary aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a digital intervention called Changing Health that provides structured education and lifestyle behaviour change support to adults with prediabetes.

          Methods

          A single-group pilot study will be undertaken. We aim to recruit 40 participants with prediabetes defined by HbA1c or fasting plasma glucose (FPG), aged between 18 and 75 years with a BMI ≥ 25. Participants will receive the digital intervention (a mobile phone app incorporating structured education and behavioural tools to support lifestyle behaviour change) with the aim of losing and maintaining 5–6% of their baseline body weight. Each participant will receive 100 min of lifestyle coaching over the 9-month intervention period and will have continued access to the digital intervention. Clinical outcome measures will be collected during four visits to our clinical research facility: two visits at baseline, one visit at month 3, and one visit at month 9. These secondary outcome measures will include diet, physical activity, sleep, metabolic control, body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular function. To measure primary outcomes, an embedded qualitative study will be conducted to obtain data on feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.

          Discussion

          This pilot study will establish whether Changing Health is feasible and acceptable to adults with prediabetes. Clinical outcome measures will provide estimates of variability to inform sample size calculations, and qualitative data generated will inform any necessary refinements to the intervention. This will provide a platform for a larger evaluation to assess the effectiveness of Changing Health for changing diet and physical activity to initiate and maintain weight loss in adults with prediabetes.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN69270299.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies

          Objectives Designing studies with an internal pilot phase may optimise the use of pilot work to inform more efficient randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Careful selection of preagreed decision or ‘progression’ criteria at the juncture between the internal pilot and main trial phases provides a valuable opportunity to evaluate the likely success of the main trial and optimise its design or, if necessary, to make the decision not to proceed with the main trial. Guidance on the appropriate selection and application of progression criteria is, however, lacking. This paper outlines the key issues to consider in the optimal development and review of operational progression criteria for RCTs with an internal pilot phase. Design A structured literature review and exploration of stakeholders' opinions at a Medical Research Council (MRC) Hubs for Trials Methodology Research workshop. Key stakeholders included triallists, methodologists, statisticians and funders. Results There is considerable variation in the use of progression criteria for RCTs with an internal pilot phase, although 3 common issues predominate: trial recruitment, protocol adherence and outcome data. Detailed and systematic reporting around the decision-making process for stopping, amending or proceeding to a main trial is uncommon, which may hamper understanding in the research community about the appropriate and optimal use of RCTs with an internal pilot phase. 10 top tips for the development, use and reporting of progression criteria for internal pilot studies are presented. Conclusions Systematic and transparent reporting of the design, results and evaluation of internal pilot trials in the literature should be encouraged in order to facilitate understanding in the research community and to inform future trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Behavioral treatment of obesity in patients encountered in primary care settings: a systematic review.

            In 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) approved intensive behavioral weight loss counseling for approximately 14 face-to-face, 10- to 15-minute sessions over 6 months for obese beneficiaries in primary care settings, when delivered by physicians and other CMS-defined primary care practitioners.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Systematic review assessing the effectiveness of dietary intervention on gut microbiota in adults with type 2 diabetes

              Aims/hypothesis Despite improved understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus, explanations for individual variability in disease progression and response to treatment are incomplete. The gut microbiota has been linked to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and may account for this variability. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of dietary and physical activity/exercise interventions in modulating the gut microbiota and improving glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods A systematic search was conducted to identify studies reporting on the effect of dietary and physical activity/exercise interventions on the gut microbiota and glucose control in individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Study characteristics, methodological quality and details relating to interventions were captured using a data-extraction form. Meta-analyses were conducted where sufficient data were available, and other results were reported narratively. Results Eight studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review. No studies were found that reported on the effects of physical activity/exercise on the gut microbiota and glucose control. However, studies reporting on dietary interventions showed that such interventions were associated with modifications to the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota. There was a statistically significant improvement in HbA1c (standardised mean difference [SMD] −2.31 mmol/mol [95% CI −2.76, −1.85] [0.21%; 95% CI −0.26, −0.16]; I 2 = 0%, p   0.05), fasting insulin (SMD −1.82 pmol/l [95% CI −7.23, 3.60], I 2 = 54%, p > 0.05) or HOMA-IR (SMD −0.15 [95% CI −0.63, 0.32], I 2 = 69%, p > 0.05) when comparing dietary interventions with comparator groups. There were no significant changes in the relative abundance of bacteria in the genera Bifidobacterium (SMD 1.29% [95% CI −4.45, 7.03], I 2 = 33%, p > 0.05), Roseburia (SMD −0.85% [95% CI −2.91, 1.21], I 2 = 79%, p > 0.05) or Lactobacillus (SMD 0.04% [95% CI −0.01, 0.09], I 2 = 0%, p > 0.05) when comparing dietary interventions with comparator groups. There were, however, other significant changes in the gut microbiota, including changes at various taxonomic levels, including phylum, family, genus and species, Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratios and changes in diversity matrices (α and β). Dietary intervention had minimal or no effect on inflammation, short-chain fatty acids or anthropometrics. Conclusions/interpretation Dietary intervention was found to modulate the gut microbiota and improve glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Although the results of the included studies are encouraging, this review highlights the need for further well-conducted interventional studies to inform the clinical use of dietary interventions targeting the gut microbiota. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-018-4632-0) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sophie.cassidy@newcastle.ac.uk
                nduka.okwose@newcastle.ac.uk
                j.h.scragg@newcastle.ac.uk
                david.houghton@newcastle.ac.uk
                coachkirsten@changinghealth.com
                micahel.trenell@newcastle.ac.uk
                djordje.jakovljevic@newcastle.ac.uk
                kate.hallsworth@newcastle.ac.uk
                leah.avery@tees.ac.uk
                Journal
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot and Feasibility Studies
                BioMed Central (London )
                2055-5784
                26 November 2019
                26 November 2019
                2019
                : 5
                : 139
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, GRID grid.1006.7, Institute of Cellular Medicine, , Newcastle University, ; Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, GRID grid.1006.7, NIHR Innovation Observatory, , Newcastle University, ; Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 2244, GRID grid.420004.2, The Liver Unit, , Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2325 1783, GRID grid.26597.3f, Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sports Sciences, School of Health & Social Care, , Teesside University, ; Tees Valley, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0228-7274
                Article
                519
                10.1186/s40814-019-0519-1
                6878649
                31788325
                78dff699-6d09-46bd-93c2-e79a93bbd828
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 May 2019
                : 15 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Health Research
                Award ID: CAT CL-2013-04-010
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000690, Research Councils UK;
                Award ID: L016354
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                prediabetes,lifestyle behaviour change,digital intervention,diet,physical activity,weight loss

                Comments

                Comment on this article