1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early-Life m 6A RNA Demethylation by Fat Mass and Obesity-Associated Protein (FTO) Influences Resilience or Vulnerability to Heat Stress Later in Life

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          Early life heat stress leads to either resilience or vulnerability to a similar stress later in life. We have previously shown that this tuning of the stress response depends on neural network organization in the preoptic anterior hypothalamus (PO/AH) thermal response center and is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. Here, we expand our understanding of stress response establishment describing a role for epitranscriptomic regulation of the epigenetic machinery. Specifically, we explore the role of N 6-methyladenosine (m 6A) RNA methylation in long-term response to heat stress. Heat conditioning of 3-d-old chicks diminished m 6A RNA methylation in the hypothalamus, simultaneously with an increase in the mRNA levels of the m 6A demethylase, fat mass and obesity-associated protein ( FTO). Moreover, a week later, methylation of two heat stress-related transcripts, histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) methyltransferase, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 ( EZH2) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF), were downregulated in harsh-heat-conditioned chicks. During heat challenge a week after conditioning, there was a reduction of m 6A levels in mild-heat-conditioned chicks and an elevation in harsh-heat-conditioned ones. This increase in m 6A modification was negatively correlated with the expression levels of both BDNF and EZH2. Antisense “knock-down” of FTO caused an elevation of global m 6A RNA methylation, reduction of EZH2 and BDNF mRNA levels, and decrease in global H3K27 dimethylation as well as dimethyl H3K27 level along BDNF coding region, and, finally, led to heat vulnerability. These findings emphasize the multilevel regulation of gene expression, including both epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulatory mechanisms, fine-tuning the neural network organization in a response to stress.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transcriptome-wide mapping of N(6)-methyladenosine by m(6)A-seq based on immunocapturing and massively parallel sequencing.

          N(6)-methyladenosine-sequencing (m(6)A-seq) is an immunocapturing approach for the unbiased transcriptome-wide localization of m(6)A in high resolution. To our knowledge, this is the first protocol to allow a global view of this ubiquitous RNA modification, and it is based on antibody-mediated enrichment of methylated RNA fragments followed by massively parallel sequencing. Building on principles of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), read densities of immunoprecipitated RNA relative to untreated input control are used to identify methylated sites. A consensus motif is deduced, and its distance to the point of maximal enrichment is assessed; these measures further corroborate the success of the protocol. Identified locations are intersected in turn with gene architecture to draw conclusions regarding the distribution of m(6)A between and within gene transcripts. When applied to human and mouse transcriptomes, m(6)A-seq generated comprehensive methylation profiles revealing, for the first time, tenets governing the nonrandom distribution of m(6)A. The protocol can be completed within ~9 d for four different sample pairs (each consists of an immunoprecipitation and corresponding input).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Messenger RNA modifications: Form, distribution, and function.

            RNA contains more than 100 distinct modifications that promote the functions of stable noncoding RNAs in translation and splicing. Recent technical advances have revealed widespread and sparse modification of messenger RNAs with N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A), 5-methylcytosine (m(5)C), and pseudouridine (Ψ). Here we discuss the rapidly evolving understanding of the location, regulation, and function of these dynamic mRNA marks, collectively termed the epitranscriptome. We highlight differences among modifications and between species that could instruct ongoing efforts to understand how specific mRNA target sites are selected and how their modification is regulated. Diverse molecular consequences of individual m(6)A modifications are beginning to be revealed, but the effects of m(5)C and Ψ remain largely unknown. Future work linking molecular effects to organismal phenotypes will broaden our understanding of mRNA modifications as cell and developmental regulators.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              m(6)A in mRNA: An Ancient Mechanism for Fine-Tuning Gene Expression.

              Modifications in mRNA constitute ancient mechanisms to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) is the most prominent mRNA modification, and is installed by a large methyltransferase complex (the m(6)A 'writer'), not only specifically bound by RNA-binding proteins (the m(6)A 'readers'), but also removed by demethylases (the m(6)A 'erasers'). m(6)A mRNA modifications have been linked to regulation at multiple steps in mRNA processing. In analogy to the regulation of gene expression by miRNAs, we propose that the main function of m(6)A is post-transcriptional fine-tuning of gene expression. In contrast to miRNA regulation, which mostly reduces gene expression, we argue that m(6)A provides a fast mean to post-transcriptionally maximize gene expression. Additionally, m(6)A appears to have a second function during developmental transitions by targeting m(6)A-marked transcripts for degradation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                17 June 2020
                26 June 2020
                May-Jun 2020
                : 7
                : 3
                : ENEURO.0549-19.2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center , Rishon LeZion, Israel 7505101
                [2 ]The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Rehovot, Israel 761001
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: T.K. and N.M. designed research; T.K., O.B.-N., and M.R. performed research; T.K. and T.R. analyzed data; T.K. and N.M. wrote the paper.

                This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation Grant 1646/15.

                Correspondence should be addressed to Noam Meiri at noam.meiri@ 123456mail.huji.ac.il .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-5665
                Article
                eN-NWR-0549-19
                10.1523/ENEURO.0549-19.2020
                7329298
                32554504
                78e2d532-676e-447a-905a-4dffb290aaa1
                Copyright © 2020 Kisliouk et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 26 December 2019
                : 7 May 2020
                : 10 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 48, Pages: 14, Words: 00
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/501100003977Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
                Award ID: 1646/15
                Categories
                2
                Research Article: New Research
                Development
                Custom metadata
                May/June 2020

                chick,epigenetics,epitranscriptomics,fto,hypothalamus,thermoregulation

                Comments

                Comment on this article