1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Simplicity of the Brachial Plexus: Common Nerve Roots for Synergistic Function

      discussion
      , MD, FACS 1 , , , MD, MMSc 1
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Wolters Kluwer Health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The upper extremity moves in coordinated motions to accomplish complex tasks. 1,2 This requires contraction of multiple muscles in unison for actions to occur in a natural, seamless fashion. 2 For example, as one brings one's hand to his or her mouth, the shoulder externally rotates, extends and adducts, while the hand supinates and the elbow flexes. The muscles required to perform this movement are innervated by various terminal nerve branches (eg, suprascapular, axillary, lateral pectoral nerve, musculocutaneous, radial nerve), but fibers all originate from the same C5-6 nerve roots. Less natural motions require more intentional action of the thorax, shoulder, and elbow. The purpose of this article is to examine the organization of the brachial plexus in one simple, unifying theme: muscles involved in synergistic function share a common nerve root, despite their terminal branch. The brachial plexus originates as 5 ventral roots from C5 to T1 and terminates as 5 motor branches that power the upper extremity. Between the roots and branches, the plexus becomes 3 trunks, 6 divisions, and 3 cords. Along this course, the plexus gives off 12 other terminal branches. The intervening convolution between the roots and branches, at first glance, would seem unnecessary. The crossing divisions and contributions from each cord provide complexity in anatomy that cannot be explained by redundancy, as loss of a single nerve can lead to devastating loss of function. The anatomical intricacies, however, can be explained as a highway system for nerve roots to arrive at target muscles, with multiple muscles working together to perform 1 coordinated motion. The intervening trunks, divisions, and cords can be thought of as simply a system to deliver axons from a similar nerve root to terminal branches that reach the end target muscle of interest. Each of these motions occurs as a result of various muscles contracting together and are all innervated by similar nerve roots, despite variations in branches. Cadaveric dissections demonstrate variations in innervation patterns. The triceps receives nerve fibers from the radial nerve, axillary nerve, and/or even branches off the ulnar nerve. 3,4 Anatomic discrepancies can also been seen for the extensor carpi radialis brevis between the superficial branch of the radial nerve (55%), posterior interosseous nerve (2nd most common), and radial nerve. 5 Despite the variability in terminal nerve branch, the derivative nerve root remains consistent. The more proximal and distal muscles are primarily innervated by the higher and lower nerve roots, respectively. However, this is not uniformly true. For example, the pectoralis major is the only muscle with 2 nerves directly off the brachial plexus and innervation from every nerve root (lateral pectoral nerve C5, C6, C7 and medial pectoral nerve C8, T1). The lack of innervation order can also be seen for the finger extensors. The brachial plexus is a complex network of structure and function whose layout can be simplified into axons going from point A (nerve root) to point B (synergistic muscle) with the intervening trunks, cords and divisions being a system to deliver these axons to synergistic muscles that co-contract in unison. As the philosophical principle, Occam's razor, states, the simplest solution tends to be correct. This may very well also be the case for the brachial plexus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cutting your nerve changes your brain.

          Following upper limb peripheral nerve transection and surgical repair, some patients regain good sensorimotor function while others do not. Understanding peripheral and central mechanisms that contribute to recovery may facilitate the development of new therapeutic interventions. Plasticity following peripheral nerve transection has been demonstrated throughout the neuroaxis in animal models of nerve injury. However, the brain changes that occur following peripheral nerve transection and surgical repair in humans have not been examined. Furthermore, the extent to which peripheral nerve regeneration influences functional and structural brain changes has not been characterized. Therefore, we asked whether functional changes are accompanied by grey and/or white matter structural changes and whether these changes relate to sensory recovery? To address these key issues we (i) assessed peripheral nerve regeneration; (ii) measured functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation (blood oxygen level dependent signal; BOLD) in response to a vibrotactile stimulus; (iii) examined grey and white matter structural brain plasticity; and (iv) correlated sensory recovery measures with grey matter changes in peripheral nerve transection and surgical repair patients. Compared to each patient's healthy contralesional nerve, transected nerves have impaired nerve conduction 1.5 years after transection and repair, conducting with decreased amplitude and increased latency. Compared to healthy controls, peripheral nerve transection and surgical repair patients had altered blood oxygen level dependent signal activity in the contralesional primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, and in a set of brain areas known as the 'task positive network'. In addition, grey matter reductions were identified in several brain areas, including the contralesional primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, in the same areas where blood oxygen level dependent signal reductions were identified. Furthermore, grey matter thinning in the post-central gyrus was negatively correlated with measures of sensory recovery (mechanical and vibration detection) demonstrating a clear link between function and structure. Finally, we identified reduced white matter fractional anisotropy in the right insula in a region that also demonstrated reduced grey matter. These results provide insight into brain plasticity and structure-function-behavioural relationships following nerve injury and have important therapeutic implications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The superficial branch of the radial nerve: an anatomic study with surgical implications.

            Twenty fresh cadaver extremities were dissected to delineate and quantify the course of the superficial branch of the radial nerve. This branch bifurcated from the radial nerve at the level of the lateral humeral epicondyle in eight specimens, and in all specimens the bifurcation was no more than 2.1 cm from the lateral epicondyle. It continued distally, deep to the brachioradialis and became subcutaneous a mean of 9.0 cm proximal to the radial styloid, traversing between the tendons of the brachioradialis and extensor carpi radialis longus. The superficial branch of the radial nerve branched a mean of 5.1 cm proximal to the radial styloid. Distally, at the level of the extensor retinaculum, the closest branches to the center of the first dorsal compartment and to Lister's tubercle were mean distances of 0.4 and 1.6 cm, respectively. In the hand, the superficial branch of the radial nerve most commonly supplied branches to the thumb, the index finger, and the dorsoradial aspect of the long finger. Knowledge of the course of the superficial branch of the radial nerve will help prevent injury during operative procedures on the radial side of the hand, wrist, and forearm and will aid in its localization in treatment of traumatic injuries or performance of nerve blocks in its distribution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Central adaptation following heterotopic hand replantation probed by fMRI and effective connectivity analysis.

              In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we examined changes--relative to healthy controls--in the cortical activation and connectivity patterns of two patients who had undergone unilateral heterotopic hand replantation. The study involved the patients and a group of control subjects performing visually paced hand movements with their left, right, or both hands. Changes of effective connectivity among a bilateral network of core motor regions comprising M1, lateral premotor cortex (PMC), and the supplementary motor area (SMA) were assessed using dynamic causal modelling. Both patients showed inhibition of ipsilateral PMC and SMA when moving the healthy hand, potentially indicating a suppression of inference with physiological motor execution by the hemisphere controlling the replanted hand. Moving the replanted hand, both patients showed increased activation of contralateral PMC, most likely reflecting the increased effort involved, and a pathological inhibition of the ipsilateral on the active contralateral M1 indicative of an unsuccessful modulation of the inhibitory M1-M1 balance. In one patient, M1 contralateral to the replanted hand experienced increased tonic (intrinsic connectivity) and phasic (replanted hand movement) facilitating input, whereas in the other, pathological suppression was present. These differences in effective connectivity correlated with decreased behavioural performance of the latter as assessed by kinematic analysis, and seemed to be related to earlier and more intense rehabilitative exercise commenced by the former. This study hence demonstrates the potential of functional neuroimaging to monitor plastic changes of cortical connectivity due to peripheral damage and recovery in individual patients, which may prove to be a valuable tool in understanding, evaluating and enhancing motor rehabilitation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2169-7574
                August 2019
                08 August 2019
                : 7
                : 8
                : e2364
                Affiliations
                [1]From the Department of Surgery, Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Ill.; and Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
                Author notes
                Brian Mailey, MD, Department of Surgery, Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, 747 N. Rutledge Street, Springfield, IL 62704, E-mail: bmailey48@ 123456siumed.edu
                Article
                00040
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000002364
                6756667
                78e8b755-4b47-41de-8f8d-ee9c7bc9b83e
                Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Viewpoint
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article