11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Secondary structure assignment that accurately reflects physical and evolutionary characteristics

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 4 ,
      BMC Bioinformatics
      BioMed Central
      Italian Society of Bioinformatics (BITS): Annual Meeting 2005
      17–19 March 2005

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Secondary structure is used in hierarchical classification of protein structures, identification of protein features, such as helix caps and loops, for fold recognition, and as a precursor to ab initio structure prediction. There are several methods available for assigning secondary structure if the three-dimensional structure of the protein is known. Unfortunately they differ in their definitions, particularly in the exact positions of the termini. Additionally, most existing methods rely on hydrogen bonding, which means that important secondary structural classes, such as isolated β-strands and poly-proline helices cannot be identified as they do not have characteristic hydrogen-bonding patterns. For this reason we have developed a more accurate method for assigning secondary structure based on main chain geometry, which also allows a more comprehensive assignment of secondary structure.

          Results

          We define secondary structure based on a number of geometric parameters. Helices are defined based on whether they fit inside an imaginary cylinder: residues must be within the correct radius of a central axis. Different types of helices (alpha, 3 10 or π) are assigned on the basis of the angle between successive peptide bonds. β-strands are assigned based on backbone dihedrals and with alternating peptide bonds. Thus hydrogen bonding is not required and β-strands can be within a parallel sheet, antiparallel sheet, or can be isolated. Poly-proline helices are defined similarly, although with three-fold symmetry.

          Conclusion

          We find that our method better assigns secondary structure than existing methods. Specifically, we find that comparing our methods with those of others, amino-acid trends at helix caps are stronger, secondary structural elements less likely to be concatenated together and secondary structure guided sequence alignment is improved. We conclude, therefore, that secondary structure assignments using our method better reflects physical and evolutionary characteristics of proteins.

          The program is available from http://www.bioinf.man.ac.uk/~lovell/segno.shtml

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

          Geometrical validation around the Calpha is described, with a new Cbeta measure and updated Ramachandran plot. Deviation of the observed Cbeta atom from ideal position provides a single measure encapsulating the major structure-validation information contained in bond angle distortions. Cbeta deviation is sensitive to incompatibilities between sidechain and backbone caused by misfit conformations or inappropriate refinement restraints. A new phi,psi plot using density-dependent smoothing for 81,234 non-Gly, non-Pro, and non-prePro residues with B < 30 from 500 high-resolution proteins shows sharp boundaries at critical edges and clear delineation between large empty areas and regions that are allowed but disfavored. One such region is the gamma-turn conformation near +75 degrees,-60 degrees, counted as forbidden by common structure-validation programs; however, it occurs in well-ordered parts of good structures, it is overrepresented near functional sites, and strain is partly compensated by the gamma-turn H-bond. Favored and allowed phi,psi regions are also defined for Pro, pre-Pro, and Gly (important because Gly phi,psi angles are more permissive but less accurately determined). Details of these accurate empirical distributions are poorly predicted by previous theoretical calculations, including a region left of alpha-helix, which rates as favorable in energy yet rarely occurs. A proposed factor explaining this discrepancy is that crowding of the two-peptide NHs permits donating only a single H-bond. New calculations by Hu et al. [Proteins 2002 (this issue)] for Ala and Gly dipeptides, using mixed quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics, fit our nonrepetitive data in excellent detail. To run our geometrical evaluations on a user-uploaded file, see MOLPROBITY (http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu) or RAMPAGE (http://www-cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/rampage). Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment.

            We have developed an automatic algorithm STRIDE for protein secondary structure assignment from atomic coordinates based on the combined use of hydrogen bond energy and statistically derived backbone torsional angle information. Parameters of the pattern recognition procedure were optimized using designations provided by the crystallographers as a standard-of-truth. Comparison to the currently most widely used technique DSSP by Kabsch and Sander (Biopolymers 22:2577-2637, 1983) shows that STRIDE and DSSP assign secondary structural states in 58 and 31% of 226 protein chains in our data sample, respectively, in greater agreement with the specific residue-by-residue definitions provided by the discoverers of the structures while in 11% of the chains, the assignments are the same. STRIDE delineates every 11th helix and every 32nd strand more in accord with published assignments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties.

              FUGUE, a program for recognizing distant homologues by sequence-structure comparison (http://www-cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/fugue/), has three key features. (1) Improved environment-specific substitution tables. Substitutions of an amino acid in a protein structure are constrained by its local structural environment, which can be defined in terms of secondary structure, solvent accessibility, and hydrogen bonding status. The environment-specific substitution tables have been derived from structural alignments in the HOMSTRAD database (http://www-cryst.bioc. cam.ac.uk/homstrad/). (2) Automatic selection of alignment algorithm with detailed structure-dependent gap penalties. FUGUE uses the global-local algorithm to align a sequence-structure pair when they greatly differ in length and uses the global algorithm in other cases. The gap penalty at each position of the structure is determined according to its solvent accessibility, its position relative to the secondary structure elements (SSEs) and the conservation of the SSEs. (3) Combined information from both multiple sequences and multiple structures. FUGUE is designed to align multiple sequences against multiple structures to enrich the conservation/variation information. We demonstrate that the combination of these three key features implemented in FUGUE improves both homology recognition performance and alignment accuracy. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Conference
                BMC Bioinformatics
                BMC Bioinformatics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2105
                2005
                1 December 2005
                : 6
                : Suppl 4
                : S8
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biochemistry Dept, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
                [2 ]Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale e Funzionale, Napoli, Italy
                [3 ]Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France
                [4 ]Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                Article
                1471-2105-6-S4-S8
                10.1186/1471-2105-6-S4-S8
                1866377
                16351757
                78f7a9a0-1279-4d30-a45b-a32f2756a138
                Copyright © 2005 Cubellis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Italian Society of Bioinformatics (BITS): Annual Meeting 2005
                Milan, Italy
                17–19 March 2005
                History
                Categories
                Research Article

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                Bioinformatics & Computational biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article