20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of Index System for Assessing Parent’s Ability on Child Injury Prevention by Delphi consultation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To construct and determine the weight of Index System for Assessing Parent’s Ability on Child Injury Prevention, and to provide the basis for childhood injury intervention in family.

          Methods Twenty-four experts majored in related fields were invited to participate in Delphi consultation. The final index system was constructed according to the consulting results and the weight of primary and secondary indicators were calculated.

          Results The final index system consisted of 5 subscales corresponding to 5 age groups: 0, 1–2, 3–5, 6–11 and 12–17 years old. Each scale included 4 primary indicators and 11 secondary indicators. The weight of primary indicators obtained by analytic hierarchy process is 0.28 for “environment”, 0.16 for “product”, 0.31 for “behaviors and skills”, and 0.25 for “psychology”. The highest weight of secondary indicators for “environment”, “product” and “behaviors and skills” was “water area”, while the top secondary indicators for “psychology” included “parental style” “emotional control” “family atmosphere”, with all indicators weighted higher than 0.2.

          Conclusion The Index System for Assessing Parent’s Ability on Child Injury Prevention by Delphi consultation is comprehensive in content, and with the focus on parental behaviors and skills on injury prevention.

          Abstract

          【摘要】 目的 探索构建儿童伤害预防家庭监护评估能力指标并确定指标权重, 为针对家长进行儿童伤害干预提供依 据。 方法 邀请中国 24 位伤害预防、儿童保健等领域专家参与德尔菲专家咨询, 根据咨询结果筛选并确定最终指标体系, 采用层次分析法确定一、二级指标权重。 结果 最终构建的评估指标体系由 0, 1~2, 3~5, 6~11 和 12~17 岁 5 个分量表构 成, 每个分量表都包括 4 个一级指标和 11 个二级指标。层次分析法得到一级指标权重: “环境” 为 0.28, “产品” 为 0.16, “行为与技能” 为 0.31, “心理” 为 0.25。“环境” “产品” 和 “行为与技能” 对应二级指标中权重最髙的均是 “水域”; “心理” 对应的 5 个二级指标权重排前 3 位的是 “家庭氛围” “教养方式” 和 “情绪管理”, 权重都在 0.2 以上。 结论 经专家咨询构 建的儿童伤害预防家庭监护能力评估指标体系内容完整, 且家长的监护行为与技能是伤害预防监护的评估重点。

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CJSH
          Chinese Journal of School Health
          Chinese Journal of School Health (China )
          1000-9817
          01 July 2022
          01 July 2022
          : 43
          : 7
          : 1086-1089
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education/School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai (200032), China
          Author notes
          *Corresponding author: WANG Shumei, E-mail: smwang@ 123456fudan.edu.cn
          Article
          j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.030
          10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.07.030
          790d1691-408d-4704-bdec-7ace8d815dc3
          © 2022 Chinese Journal of School Health

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

          Product
          Self URI (journal-page): http://www.cjsh.org.cn
          Categories
          Journal Article

          Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pediatrics,Nutrition & Dietetics,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
          Wounds and injuries,Family,Custodial care,Delphi technique,Allied health personnel

          Comments

          Comment on this article